Cases

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th of January 2016 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: *515"Denied by order of the Court in conference,

STROUD, Judge. *347 Ford Motor Company ("defendant") appeals from an order denying its motion to compel arbitration and dismiss. Defendant specifically argues that the trial court erred in concluding that (1) the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") did not apply to this dispute; (2) the parties

ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs motion for reconsideration (DE 471) of the court’s June 29, 2015, order (DE 455) excluding testimony of Dr. Eugene Mark (“Mark”). Also before the court is the motion to strike (DE 480) by defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), joined by defendant Honeywell International, Inc. (“Honeywell”). The issues raised have bee

ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This matter comes before the court on motion of defendant Honeywell International Inc. (“Honeywell”) to preclude evidence suggesting that brake dust causes pleural mesothelioma or that “every exposure counts,” (DE 380), together with motion of defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) to exclude testimony of plaintiffs’ experts Eugene Mark, M.D. (“Mark”) and Arnold Bro

ARROWOOD, Judge. *591 Kenneth L. McBride and Mary A. McBride ("defendants") appeal from an order granting Ford Motor Credit Company LLC's ("plaintiff") motion to dismiss defendants' counterclaims and motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated herein, we reverse the order of the tria

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of August 2010 by the National Association of Manufacturers, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Tort Reform Association, and Property Casualty Insurers Association of America to Admit Mark A. Behrens Pro Hac Vice: "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of March 2011."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of August 2010 by Product Liability Advisory Council for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief: "Motion Dismissed without prejudice to refile pursuant to 28(i). By order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of February 2011."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of August 2010 by N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys, etal. for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief: "Motion Dismissed without prejudice to refile pursuant to 28(i). By order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of February 2011."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 21st day of February 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2006."

Christopher R. Kiger, Raleigh. Sandra Giannone Ezell. Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh. Richard J. Keshian, Winston-Salem. Richard D. Dietz, Raleigh. Stephen J. Darmody, Miami, for National Association of Manufacturers, et al. Andrew H. Erteschik, Raleigh, for NC Assoc. of Defense Attorneys and NC Chamber. Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., Raleigh, for Produc

724 F.Supp.2d 575 (2010) John Douglas BUTLER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jon Trevor Butler, deceased, and William Michael Prince, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Continental General Tire Company, Continental Tire North America, Inc., and Snow Tire Company, Defendants. Civil Action No. 4:09-1875-TLW. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Florence Division.

664 F.Supp.2d 752 (2009) In re FORD MOTOR CO. SPEED COTROL DEACTIVATION SWITCH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGTION. MDL No. 1718. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 29, 2009. Order on Clarification and Reconsideration January 4, 2010. *754 Michael A. Caddell, Caddell & Chapman, Houston

PER CURIAM: Raleigh Bellamy appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bellamy v. Ford Motor Company, No. 3:07-cv-00287-FDW-DCK, 2008 WL 346412 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal cont

HUDSON, Judge, dissenting. Having carefully reviewed the affidavits submitted to the trial court, I do not agree that plaintiff has failed to forecast an issue of fact as to whether DEI was a Ford-authorized manufacturer. As the majority accurately notes, Mr. Rhyne's affidavit clearly states that "Mobil Environment installed the bypass device, which is a piece known as a 555F made by Directed Electronics, Inc., or DEI, also an auth

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2025 Term FILED March 11, 2025 _____________________ released at 3:00 p.m. C. CASEY FORB

724 S.E.2d 520 (2012) STARK, et al. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY. No. 313PA10-1. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 12, 2012. K. Edward Greene, Raleigh, for Stark, Cheyenne Saleena et al. Kirk G. Warner, Raleigh, for Ford Motor Company. Robert L. Wise, for Ford Motor Company. Adam Charnes, Winston-Salem, for Ford Motor Company. Stephen J. Da

724 S.E.2d 519 (2012) STARK, et al. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY. No. 313PA10-1. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 12, 2012. K. Edward Greene, Raleigh, for Stark, Cheyenne Saleena et al. Kirk G. Warner, Raleigh, for Ford Motor Company. Robert L. Wise, for Ford Motor Company. Adam Charnes, Winston-Salem, for Ford Motor Company. Stephen J. Da

706 S.E.2d 492 (2011) STARK, et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY. No. 313PA10-1. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 22, 2011. K. Edward Greene, Raleigh, for Stark, Cheyenne Saleena et al. Kirk G. Warner, Raleigh, for Ford Motor Company. Robert L. Wise, for Ford Motor Company. Adam Charnes, Winston-Salem, for Ford Motor Company. Stephen J. Dar

705 S.E.2d 741 (2011) Cheyenne Saleena STARK, a Minor, Cody Brandon Stark, a Minor, by their Guardian ad Litem, Nicole Jacobsen v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation. No. 313PA10. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 3, 2011. K. Edward Greene, Raleigh, for Stark, Cheyenne Saleena et al. Mr. Kirk G. Warner, Raleigh, for Ford Motor Company.

706 S.E.2d 247 (2011) STARK, et al. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY. No. 313PA10-1. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 10, 2011. K. Edward Greene, for Stark, Cheyenne Saleena et al. Kirk G. Warner, Raleigh, for Ford Motor Company. Robert L. Wise, for Ford Motor Company. Adam Charnes, Winston-Salem, for Ford Motor Company. Stephen J. Darmody, fo