Cases

Order entered April 30, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01055-CR RAFAEL ORTIZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed April 30, 2014. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01055-CR RAFAEL ORTIZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Cour

Order entered January 8, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01055-CR RAFAEL ORTIZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal Distri

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VI CERTIORARI procedente del BRENDA GELABERT ORTIZ Tribunal de Primera Recurrida Instancia, Sal

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL V MELERY ORTIZ Apelación acogida BELTRÁN como CERTIORARI Procedente del Tribunal Recurrida de Primera Instancia,

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VI BRENDA GELABERT Certiorari ORTIZ procedente del Tribunal de Primera Recurrente Instancia, Sala Superior de Carolina

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XI RAFAEL ÁNGEL RONDÓN CERTIORARI NIEVES Procedente del Tribunal Superior Recurrido de Caguas v. KLCE202400587 Civil Núm.:

JAMES EDWARD WELSH, Judge. Paul Varsalona appeals, the circuit court’s judgment after a jury verdict in favor of Rafael Jimenez Ortiz in his automobile negligence case against Ortiz. Var-salona’s claims on appeal are based on his contention that Ortiz was required to plead as an affirmative defense that Varsalona backed into him. We affirm. Background

Opinion McDONALD, J. Defendants Rafael Ortiz, Raymundo Quezada, and Gustavo Martinez, Jr. (together Defendants), appeal judgments following their jury convictions of two counts of kidnapping during a carjacking (counts 1 and 2; Pen. Code, § 209.5, subd. (a))1 and one count of evading a police officer with reckless driving (count 3; Veh. Code, § 2800.2, subd. (a)). The jury also f

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL FIRSTBANK Apelación PUERTO RICO procedente del Tribunal de Primera Apelado Instancia, Sala Superior de Caguas

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT Production Lift Companies, Inc. * From the County Court at and Wireline Services, Inc., Law No. 2 of Midland County, Trial Court No. CC19833. Vs. No. 11-17-00331-CV * May 31, 2019 Rafael Valdez and Kenny Ortiz, * Memorandum Opinion by

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL II BRENDA GELABERT ORTIZ Apelación Y OTROS procedente del Tribunal de Parte Peticionaria Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de

Opinion filed May 31, 2019 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-17-00331-CV __________ PRODUCTION LIFT COMPANIES, INC. AND WIRELINE SERVICES, INC., Appellants V. RAFAEL VALDEZ AND KENNY ORTIZ, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Lauriat, J. Rafael Ortiz (“Ortiz”) stands indicted on charges of distribution of cocaine (001) and distribution of cocaine in a school zone (002). These charges arise from a search of an apartment following his arrest there by Lowell police officers executing an arrest warrant on March 1, 2001. Ortiz has now moved to suppress from evidence at trial the fruits of that search, contending that there was no valid

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. Defendant-appellant Rafael Ortiz appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to distribute, and to possess with intent to distribute, cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846. Ortiz first contends that the district court erred in denying

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00012-CV Rafael Francisco Narvaez, Appellant v.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00012-CV Rafael Francisco Narvaez, Appellant v. Rita Ortiz Maldonado, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. FM007491, HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESIDING OPINION

MEMORANDUM ** Appellants contest the district court’s refusal to take judicial notice of the finding of a California Superior Court, issued during a probation revocation hearing, that the State of California had not proved that Andrew Smith resisted arrest. We affirm. A court may notice only those adjudicative facts not subject to reasonable dispute. Fed.R.Evid. 201(b). “[W]hen a court

EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge: Defendants Francisco Sanchez-Martinez, Miguel Martinez-Rios, Ismael Ramirez-Fa-jardo, Manuel Castaneda-Marin, and Domin *461 go Ortiz-Cotoa appeal their convictions and sentences for conspiracy to possess and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute while on board a

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Appellant Angel Ortiz-Vega (“Ortiz”) was charged with several counts related to a drug distribution conspiracy in Puerto Rico. Ortiz was originally represented by court-appointed counsel, Francisco M. Dolz-Sanchez (“Dolz”), but after seven months retained private counsel, Luis R. Rivera-Rodriguez (“Rivera”), because, according to Ortiz, Dolz failed to provid