Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Rafael Franco”
in the Estate of Rafael Franco, Sr.public domain
NUMBER 13-15-00376-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN THE ESTATE OF RAFAEL FRANCO, SR., DECEASED On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Nueces County, Texas. ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Longoria Order P
in the Estate of Rafael Franco, Sr.public domain
NUMBER 13-15-00376-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN THE ESTATE OF RAFAEL FRANCO, SR., DECEASED On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Nueces County, Texas ORDER Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Ord
Franco v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Rafael Contreras Franco and Maria S. Contreras, natives and citizens of Mexico, *455petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ dismissal of their appeal of an immigration judge’s denial of their applications for cancellation of removal. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dism
United States v. Francopublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Rafael Urena appeals from a sentence of 135 months imposed by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Daniels, J.) following a plea of guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 812, 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural background and issues pre
United States v. Jose Rafael Perez-Francopublic domain
BOWNES, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Jose Rafael Perez-Franco appeals the sentence he was given pursuant to the new Sentencing Guidelines. He claims that the district court incorrectly calculated his offense level by refusing to give him credit for acceptance of responsibility as provided for under the Guidelines. We hold that a defendant needs to accept responsibility onl
United States v. Francopublic domain
112 F.Supp.2d 204 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. [1] Lorenzo Muñoz FRANCO, [2] Francisco Sanchez Aran, [3] Ariel Gutierrez Rodriguez, [4] Wilfredo Umpierre Hernandez, [5] Enrique Gutierrez Rodriguez, [6] Rafael Dominguez Wolff, Defendants. No. CRIM. 95-0386(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 28, 2000.
United States v. Munoz Francopublic domain
124 F.Supp.2d 32 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. [1] Lorenzo MUÑOZ FRANCO, [2] Francisco Sanchez Aran, [3] Ariel Gutierrez Rodriguez, [4] Wilfredo Umpierre Hernandez, [5] Enrique Gutierrez Rodriguez, [6] Rafael Dominguez Wolff, Defendants. No. CRIM 95-0386(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 27, 2000.
United States v. Munoz-Francopublic domain
14 F.Supp.2d 167 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Lorenzo MUÑOZ-FRANCO, Francisco Sanchez-Aran, Ariel Gutierrez-Rodriguez, Wilfredo Umpierre-Hernandez, Enrique Gutierrez-Rodriguez, Rafael Dominguez-Wolff, Defendants. Criminal No. 95-0386CCC. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 28, 1998. *168 Guillerm
United States v. Munoz Francopublic domain
123 F.Supp.2d 45 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. [1] Lorenzo MUÑOZ FRANCO, [2] Francisco Sanchez Aran, [3] Ariel Gutierrez Rodriguez, [4] Wilfredo Umpierre Hernandez, [5] Enrique Gutierrez Rodriguez, [6] Rafael Dominguez Wolff, Defendants. No. CR. 95-0386(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 30, 2000. On Motions to Dismiss,
United States v. Muñoz-Francopublic domain
986 F.Supp. 70 (1997) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Lorenzo MUÑOZ-FRANCO, Francisco Sanchez-Aran, Ariel Gutierrez-Rodriguez, Wilfredo Umpierre-Hernandez, Enrique Gutierrez-Rodriguez, Rafael Dominguez-Wolff, Defendants. No. 95-0386CCC. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 6, 1997. Guillermo Gil, U.S. Atty., María A. Domínguez, Asst. U.S. A
United States v. Munoz Francopublic domain
113 F.Supp.2d 224 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Lorenzo MUÑOZ FRANCO, [2] Francisco Sanchez Aran, [3] Ariel Gutierrez Rodriguez, [4] Wilfredo Umpierre Hernandez, [5] Enrique Gutierrez Rodriguez, [6] Rafael Dominguez Wolff, Defendants. Criminal 95-0386(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 25, 2000.
PER CURIAM. On November 23, 1987, Jose Rafael Perez-Franco and Jose Luis Leon-Urena were charged, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(i) and 846, with possession of a kilogram or more of heroin with intent to distribute. These offenses carry maximum terms of ten or more years. A magistrate held a combination probable cause-detention hearing on November 25, 1987. The di
Martínez v. Colón Francopublic domain
El Juez Asociado Señor Ortiz emitió la opinión del Tribunal. La divergencia entre lo aparente y lo real en el campo contractual provoca la presente controversia. Veamos los he-chos. El 25 de marzo de 1980 el Sr. Wilfredo Colón Franco y su esposa, la Sra. Nivea Concepción, comparecieron, en calidad de compradores de un inmueble sito en el Municipio de Ca-guas, ante el notario Libertario Pérez Rod
Martino Diaz, Juan Rafael v. Medirec Incpublic domain
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL III JUAN RAFAEL MARTINO DÍAZ Apelación procedente del Apelante Tribunal de Primera v.
Graham v. Francopublic domain
488 S.W.2d 390 (1972) Bill GRAHAM et al., Petitioners, v. Rafael FRANCO et ux., Respondents. No. B-2997. Supreme Court of Texas. November 8, 1972. Rehearing Denied December 20, 1972. Kleberg, Mobley, Lockett & Weil, Lev Hunt, Corpus Christi, for petitioners. Allison, Maddin, White & Brin, Harry F. Maddin and James A. Smith, Corpus Chr
Reyes, Rafaelpublic domain
PD-1020-15 PD-1020-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 8/7/2015 11:15:01 AM Accepted 8/11/2015 1:42:52 PM
Rafael Reyes v. Statepublic domain
OPINION MIKE WILLSON, JUSTICE The jury found Rafael Reyes guilty of the offense of evading arrest or detention while using a vehicle. The jury assessed punishment at confinement for three years and a $3,000 fíne. The trial court sentenced Appellant accordingly. Appellant presents four issues on appeal. We affirm. I. The
Franco v. Grahampublic domain
470 S.W.2d 429 (1971) Rafael FRANCO et ux., Appellants, v. Bill GRAHAM et al., Appellees. No. 618. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. June 17, 1971. Rehearings Denied September 9, 1971. *432 Allison, Maddin, White & Brin, Harry F. Maddin, James H. Smith, Corpus Christi, for appellants. Kl
State v. Rafael Galvanpublic domain
GRATTON, Judge. Rafael Galvan appeals from his judgment of conviction and sentence for stalking in the first degree, Idaho Code § 18-7905, and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, I.C. §§ 18-905(a), 19-2520. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Galvan and the victim were married for twenty-three years
Rafael Margarida & Co. v. Audi of America, Inc.public domain
721 F.Supp. 394 (1989) RAFAEL MARGARIDA & COMPANY, INC., Guillermo Margarida and Manuela Veve de Margarida, pro se and as parents with patria potestad over her minor daughter, Sonia Margarida-Veve, Plaintiffs, v. AUDI OF AMERICA, INC., and Volkswagen of America, Inc., Defendants. Civ. No. 87-1413(RLA). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 11, 1989.