Cases

526 A.2d 945 (1987) STATE of Maine v. Patricia A. HOPKINS. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued March 10, 1987. Decided May 28, 1987. *946 James E. Tierney, Atty. Gen., Rae Ann French (orally), Asst. Atty. Gen., Augusta, for plaintiff. James C. Hunt (orally), Daniel G. Lilley, P.A. Law Offices, Portland, for defendant.<

[Cite as Hopkins v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth., 2024-Ohio-2265.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA DAVID HOPKINS, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 113088 v.

120 F.3d 991 38 Fed.R.Serv.3d 632, 27 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,506,47 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 757,Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 15,020,97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5803,97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9348 David SCHUDEL, et al., Plaintiffs,andDeborah Guaragna-Williams, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., a foreign corporation; KaiserAluminum And Chemical Corporation, a foreigncorporation, Defendants-App

OPINION AND ORDER PHILIP P. SIMON, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Christina Jones brought this action against her employer, defendant Alpha Rae Personnel, and Alpha Rae’s contractor, defendant Affiliated Computer Services, asserting retaliation claims under Title VII. Jones alleges that Alpha Rae and ACS removed her from ACS’s South Bend job site in retaliation for filing two formal concurrent complain

238 S.W.3d 743 (2007) Marsha HOPKINS, Employee/Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent. No. ED 89585. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. November 13, 2007. Jennifer Rae Chestnut, Attorney Generals Office, St. Louis, MO, for

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00906-CV David MAUK, Appellant v. PIPE CREEK WATER WELL, LLC and Robert Rae Powell, Appellees

ORDER LEONARD T. STRAND, United States Magistrate Judge. This case is before me on plaintiffs June 25, 2014, motion (Doc. No. 16) for leave to amend her complaint. The proposed amended complaint would, if allowed, add seven new defendants to this case while also adding additional allegations to Count IV. In addition to seeking leave to file the amended complaint, plaintiff seeks entry of an ord

690 So.2d 1341 (1997) Martha RAE a/k/a Mrs. Ian Nicholas Rae, Appellant, v. John F. FLYNN, M.D., Appellee. Nos. 96-1705, 96-1704. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 19, 1997. Lesperance & Lesperance, and Richard M. Gale, Miami, for appellant. Randolph W. Sadtler, Tavernier, for appellee. Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN, a

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER PICKERING, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Sever filed on behalf of Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc. The Court, having reviewed the motion, the briefs of the parties, the authorities cited, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds to-wit: The present lawsuit was filed on November 1, 1993, in the Circ

34 Mass. App. Ct. 498 (1993) 612 N.E.2d 1205 RAE F. GILL, P.C. vs. LOUIS F. DiGIOVANNI & another.[1] No. 92-P-868. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Middlesex. November 20, 1992. May 19, 1993. Present: ARMSTRONG, PERRETTA, & GILLERMAN, JJ. Laurence S. Fordham for the plaintiff. James F

401 Mass. 88 (1987) 514 N.E.2d 1079 MARVIN H. MARGOLIES vs. ROLAND G. HOPKINS.[1] Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. September 10, 1987. November 5, 1987. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., WILKINS, LIACOS, ABRAMS, & LYNCH, JJ. George M. Ford (Andrew P. Brown with him) for the defendant. Mar

934 S.W.2d 774 (1996) Helen B. WILS, Attorney Ad Litem, Appellant, v. George A. ROBINSON, individually; Charter National Bank, Houston, Henry J.N. Taub, II, and Anthony J.A. Bryan, Trustees; and George A. Robinson, IV, Appellees. No. 14-95-00909-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). September 26, 1996. Rehearing Overruled December 5, 1996.

158 Mich. App. 361 (1987) 404 N.W.2d 744 HOPKINS v. CITY OF MIDLAND Docket No. 86540. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March 3, 1987. Foster, Swift, Collins & Coey, P.C. (by Arthur R. Przybylowicz and William F. Young), for plaintiff. John J. Rae, for defendant. Before: DANHOF, C.J., and SHEPHER

In an action by a vendee’s assignees to recover damages for breach of a contract to sell real property, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 7,1971, in favor of plaintiffs, after a nonjury trial. Judg*709ment reversed, on the law and the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. In our opinion, reversible error was committed by barring

In an action to foreclose a real property mortgage, the defendant and third-party plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 17, 1969, which (1) denied his motion to restore the case to the calendar for trial and (2) granted the respective motions of the plaintiff and the third-party defendant to dismiss appellant’s counterclaims and third-party complaint for lack of prosecution. Order reversed, on the law and the facts,

In an action inter alia for real estate brokerage commissions, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 30, 1975, which (1) granted defendants’ motion to vacate a certain stipulation of settlement and (2) restored the action to the Trial Calendar. Order reversed, without costs, and motion remitted to Special Term for a hearing and new determination as to the following issues: (1) whether defendant Joseph Rae’s

In an action to foreclose a mortgage upon real property, in which the defendant Rae asserted certain counterclaims and instituted a third-party action, the said Rae, as a defendant and third-party plaintiff, appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered September 1, 1964 upon the court’s opinion-decision confirming the report of a Special Referee after a nonjury trial before him, which directed foreclosure and sale as demanded in the c

In a proceeding by defendant to vacate a judgment for $29,178.28 against him in favor of plaintiff, entered May 29, 1964, by confession upon an affidavit pursuant to CPLR 3218, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 24, 1964, which granted the application and vacated the judgment. Order affirmed, with caste. The defendant executed and delivered to the plaintiff a confession of judgment which provided that it might

In an action to reform a contract for the sale to plaintiffs of certain real property, so as to include a contiguous triangular gore, and for specific performance of the contract as reformed, the defendant Rae and the two corporate defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 15,1961, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint as against them on the ground that, within the meaning of section 210 of the Civil Practi

ALLEN, Chancellor. Pending is an appeal from a decision of the Public Employee Relations Board (“PERB”) dismissing an unfair labor practice complaint filed by employees of the Colonial School District against the Colonial Paraprofessional Association and Colonial Food Service Workers Association, each of which are employee bargaining representatives, and Colonial School District. The complaint alleged that a collective bargain