Cases

243 F.Supp.2d 19 (2003) UNITED FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK; Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of the City of New York; and Raymond Kelly, Commissioner of the New York City Police Department, Defendants. No. 03 CIV. 810(BSJ). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 10, 2003. *20 Christopher Dunn,

ORDER THOMAS S. ZILLY, District Judge. Since 1943, the U.S. Department of the Navy (“Navy”) has used Outlying Landing Field (“OLF”) Coupeville to train its pilots and simulate the conditions and procedures of landing on an aircraft carrier *1072while at sea. In 2005, the Navy analyzed the projected impact of replacing the aging EA-6B Prowler wi

145 B.R. 119 (1992) In re Rachel W. HUTCHINS, Debtor. Rachel W. HUTCHINS, Plaintiff, v. COMPREHENSIVE INVESTMENT FUNDING CORPORATION, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for University Bank, National Association, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 90-11056, Adv. No. 90-1137. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island. September 25, 1992.

OPINION ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice. The question presented here is whether a Minnesota statute that prohibits knowingly false reports of police misconduct violates the First Amendment because it allows the State to punish some people, but not others, depending on the viewpoint expressed about the police. A jury found Melissa Jean Crawley guilty of violating the challenged law, Minn.Stat. § 609.505, subd.

PER CURIAM: *1021 This case arises under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, Oct. 25, 1980, T.I.A.S. No. 11670, 1343 U.N.T.S. 89, also publ'd at https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/fulltext/?cid=24 (la

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. Plaintiffs bring this lawsuit against defendants Monsanto Company and Monsanto Technology LLC (together “defendants” or “Monsanto”), seeking declaratory judgments that plaintiffs are not infringing various of defendants’ patents, that those patents are invalid and unenforceable, and that, regardless, defendants would be entitled to no remedies aga

PER CURIAM. The Texas Tort Claims Act generally limits a governmental unit’s potential liability for premise-liability damages by classifying the user of the government’s real property as a licensee rather than an invitee. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code § 101.022(a). This limitation does not apply, however, when the government’s duty to warn involves a special defect such as an

L.R. JONES, J.S.C. This case presents a legal issue regarding same-sex rights and statutory interpretation of N.J.S.A. 2A:34-2.1, which sets forth a *188list of statutory grounds for dissolution of a civil union. Absent from this list is the no-fault ground of irreconcilable differences. Notwithstanding same, and for the reasons set forth in this opinion, the

[Cite as State v. Metters, 2024-Ohio-1338.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 21AP-692 v. : (C.P.C. No. 19CR-5008) Grant A. Metters,

PRICE, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which WOMACK, J., joined. Rachel Lopez was not a physician, chemist, registered professional nurse, or licensed vocational nurse. If she was authorized to draw the appellant’s blood under the statute, it could only be by virtue of her status as a “qualified technician.”1 The statute does not define this term, but it does expressly provide th

KAFKER, J. **656 The primary issue presented in this case is how to establish the fair market value of a repossessed automobile pursuant to G. L. c. 255B, § 20B. Under § 20B, a creditor who repossesses and sells a vehicle is entitled to recover from the debtor the deficiency, if any, that

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON RECONSIDERATION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Abraham and Rachelle Fraenkel lost their son, Naftali, when Hamas . terrorists kidnapped and murdered him and two other young men. The Fraenkels and. their remaining six children sued the Syrian Arab Republic, Islamic Republic of Iran, and Iranian Ministry of Information

By Judge Robert P. Doherty, Jr. Plaintiffs, Lucas and Rachel Walker and Defendant, John T. Harrison, entered into a contract for the purchase of a used vehicle. Plaintiffs claim that promises and misrepresentations made by Defendant induced them to buy the vehicle. During the drive home following the purchase, the vehicle’s four-wheel drive failed to work and the automobile eventually ceased to operate. The Walkers attempted

CHANDLER, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. On October 27, 2006, Rachel Nelson was involved in an automobile collision. The City of Richland charged her with driving under the influence (DUI), first offense. On November 15, 2006, Nelson pleaded nolo contendere in the Municipal Court of Richland. The court found Nelson guilty and imposed a sentence of forty-eight hours in jail, suspended, along with a $

VICTOR C. HOWARD, JUDGE Kristopher Anderson appeals his conviction following a bench trial for enticement of a child, section 566.151, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013, and sentence of five years imprisonment. In his sole point on appeal, he contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction because the State failed to prove lack of entrapment beyond a reasonable doubt. T

Reese, Judge. *168 The State of Georgia appeals from the trial court's grant of the motion for new trial 1 filed by Christopher Walker, who had been convicted of burglary, criminal trespass, and two counts of armed robbery following

NO. 12-20-00112-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS GARY WAYNE PRITCHETT, JR., § APPEAL FROM THE 173RD APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

OPINION WILLIAM J. BOYCE, Justice. Appellant Robert Randall Krause pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated after the trial court denied his motion to suppress blood test results. Appellant argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress because the person who obtained his blood specimen was licensed as an “emergency medical techni

Matter of Rodriguez (2021 NY Slip Op 04716) Matter of Rodriguez 2021 NY Slip Op 04716 Decided on August 18, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Per Curiam. Published by New Y

Appeal dismissed; petition for writ of mandamus denied; motion to strike denied as moot by published opinion. Judge DUNCAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge SHEDD and Judge JONES joined. DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: This appeal and petition for writ of mandamus require us to consider the extent to which we can review a district court order remanding a case to sta