⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Rachel Hall”

Hall v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2018-11-01 · Published · cited 16× · 558 S.W.3d 867
ROBIN F. WYNNE, Associate Justice Appellant Dra'Kease D. Hall appeals from the denial by the trial court of a pro se petition for a writ of error coram nobis. In January 2012, Hall pled guilty to first-degree murder and criminal attempt to commit first-degree murder and was sentenced to an aggregate term of 600 months' imprisonment. In his petition for coram nobis relief filed in the trial court, Hall alleged that th
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2023-07-07 · Published · cited 0×
07/07/2023 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 3, 2023 Session TRAVIS G. BUMBALOUGH v. RACHEL M. HALL Appeal from the Putnam County Juvenile Court No. 2021-PAT-12 Steven D. Qualls, Judge ________________
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015-01-14 · Published · cited 11× · 124 A.D.3d 657; 1 N.Y.S.3d 347
Appeals from two orders of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Richard Hoffman, J.), both dated July 29, 2013. The orders, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, found that Rachel R. permanently neglected the subject children, Angel M.R.J. and Teyana N.W, found that Obadiah J. permanently neglected Angel M.R.J., terminated Rachel R.’s parental rights with respect to the subjec
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012-12-04 · Published · cited 2× · 295 P.3d 30; 2013 OK CIV APP 4; 182 Oil & Gas Rep. 423; 2012 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 104; 2012 WL 6964751
JOHN F. FISCHER, Chief Judge. T1 Mark and Rachel Hall appeal three rulings of the district court, a January 3, 2011 order granting their motion for attorney fees, a January 31, 2011 order denying their motion for treble damages and a July 6, 2011 order denying their motion for additional attorney fees. We dismiss this appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction because the orders appealed lack the finality required for appellate r
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014-12-12 · Published · cited 1× · 342 P.3d 1007; 2015 OK CIV APP 1; 182 Oil & Gas Rep. 433; 2014 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 88; 2014 WL 7641524
JOHN F. FISCHER, Presiding Judge. T1 Mark and Rachel Hall filed this appeal challenging two attorney fee orders and two orders denying their request for treble damages in this surface damage case. Calyx also appealed the first of the attorney fee orders challenged by the Halls, The parties have failed to demonstrate any error by the district court. We modify
Davis v. Hallpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012-10-16 · Published · cited 0× · 223 N.C. App. 109; 733 S.E.2d 878; 2012 WL 4867704; 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 1193
BEASLEY, Judge. Angela W. Hall (Defendant) appeals from an order denying her Motion to Change Venue entered 7 December 2011. For the following reasons, we affirm. Gary L. Davis, CPA, P.A. (Plaintiff) is a North Carolina corporation organized to provide accounting services. Its principal place of business is located in Rowan County, North Carolina. Defendant was previously employed by Plaintiff and is also a
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014-09-24 · Published · cited 0×
THIRD DIVISION BARNES, P. J., BOGGS and BRANCH, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ September 24,
Hall v. Floridapublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-05-27 · Published · cited 645× · 188 L. Ed. 2d 1007; 134 S. Ct. 1986; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3615; 82 U.S.L.W. 4373; 572 U.S. 701; 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 779; 2014 WL 2178332
Justice KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court. *704 This Court has held that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution forbid the execution of persons with intellectual disability. Atkins v. Virginia,
State v. Hallpublic domain
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011-08-12 · Published · cited 112× · 257 P.3d 272; 292 Kan. 841
257 P.3d 272 (2011) STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Sterling Ray HALL, III, Appellant. No. 102,070. Supreme Court of Kansas. August 12, 2011. *277 Rachel L. Pickering, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant. Natalie A. Chalmers, assistant district attorney, argued the cause,
State v. Hallpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2007-09-21 · Published · cited 1× · 167 P.3d 382; 38 Kan. App. 2d 465; 2007 Kan. App. LEXIS 978
167 P.3d 382 (2007) STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Eric Eugene HALL, Appellant. No. 95,896. Court of Appeals of Kansas. September 21, 2007. *383 Rachel Pickering and Jay Witt, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, for appellant. Ty Kaufman, county attorney, and Paul J. Morrison, attorney general, for appellee. Before
State v. Hallpublic domain
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008-10-31 · Published · cited 50× · 195 P.3d 220; 287 Kan. 139; 2008 Kan. LEXIS 594
195 P.3d 220 (2008) STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Eric Eugene HALL, Appellant. No. 95,896. Supreme Court of Kansas. October 31, 2008. *221 Rachel L. Pickering, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, argued the cause, and Jay Witt, of the same office, was with her on the briefs for appellant. Ty Kaufman, county attorney, argu
Matte v. Hallpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005-07-01 · Published · cited 18× · 20 A.D.3d 898; 798 N.Y.S.2d 829; 2005 NY Slip Op 5648; 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7449
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J), entered December 3, 2004. The order denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted plaintiffs cross motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of negligence. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court
Hall v. Moorepublic domain
Delaware Family Court · 2003-09-22 · Published · cited 0× · 832 A.2d 1264; 2003 WL 22427831
HENRIKSEN, J. This is the Court’s decision on a Rule 59 Request for Reconsideration and/or Rear-gument filed by Gordon L. Hall (“father”) on August 27, 2003. Also decided is a Motion that father has filed to extend the time in which to file his Motion for Reconsideration. By way of background, a Commissioner’s Order was entered from this Court on May 14, 2003, which increased father’s obligation of chi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-07-01 · Published · cited 3× · 610 F.3d 541; 10 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8364
610 F.3d 541 (2010) Hilda L. SOLIS, Secretary of Labor,[*] United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JASMINE HALL CARE HOMES, INC., Hall Care Homes, Inc., George K. Hall, Estela Hall, Defendants-Appellants. No. 08-15223. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted September 3, 2009. Filed July 1, 2010.
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012-02-24 · Published · cited 21× · 856 F. Supp. 2d 929; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23526; 2012 WL 619651
Memorandum Opinion and Order GARY FEINERMAN, District Judge. Section 8b of the Illinois Collection Agency Act (“ICAA”), 225 ILCS 425/8b, provides that a debt collection agency may file suit in its own name against a debtor only if it has been assigned the debtor’s account, and only if the assignment has been documented in a written agreement that states the effective date of and consideration pa
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
BARBARA ANN HALL and husband, ) DAVID A. HALL, ) Davidson Circuit ) No. 96C-1898 Plaintiffs/Appellants, ) ) VS. ) ) ST. THOMAS HOSPITAL, RACHEL ) Appeal No. KAISER, M.D., and DANIEL L. ) 01A01-9709-CV-00504 STARNES, M.D., ) ) Def
Rachel v. Trouttpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016-04-26 · Published · cited 297× · 820 F.3d 390; 94 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 816; 100 Fed. R. Serv. 346; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7515; 2016 WL 1638066
BÁCBARACH, Circuit Judge. The Federal Rules, of Civil Procedure permit a party to request an extension of time based on good cause. The plaintiff, Mr, Archie Rachel, is a state prisoner who was given 21 days to seek discovery, obtain and review responses that were not even due within the 21-day period, and respond to the-defendants* motion for dismissal or summary judgment. All
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2021-10-29 · Published · cited 0×
10/29/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 9, 2021 Session RACHEL VICTORY ET AL. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Tennessee Claims Commission (Middle Division) No. T20191169 James A. Haltom, Commissioner ________________________________
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2023-06-05 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 TN WC 43
FILED Jun 05, 2023 07:00 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2024-01-19 · Published · cited 4× · 541 P.3d 1092; 2024 WY 7
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2024 WY 7 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2023 January 19, 2024 RACHEL E. BENNETT, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-23-0115 MATTHEW J. BENNETT, Appellee (Plaintiff). Appe