Cases

573 P.2d 1381 (1978) Leland Keith O'DELL, Appellant, v. MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, Appellee. No. 3191. Supreme Court of Alaska. February 3, 1978. Wayne Anthony Ross, Anchorage, for appellant. *1382 Allen M. Bailey, Municipal Prosecutor, and Richard W. Garnett, III, Municipal Atty., Anchorage, for appellee. Before BO

576 P.2d 104 (1978) Leland Keith O'DELL, Appellant, v. MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, Appellee. No. 3763. Supreme Court of Alaska. March 24, 1978. *105 Wayne Anthony Ross, Anchorage, for appellant. Allen M. Bailey, Municipal Pros. and Richard W. Garnett, III, Municipal Atty., Anchorage, for appellee. Before BOOCHEVER, C

601 F.3d 833 (2010) Regina K. DIPPLE, Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Appellee. No. 09-1717. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 13, 2010. Filed: April 14, 2010. *834 John August Bowman, argued, (Michael DePree, Davenport, IA, on the brief), for App

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and Remand for Rehearing with Supporting Memorandum, filed January 24, 2018 (Doc. 24)("Motion"). The Motion is fully briefed. See Brief in Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and Remand the Agency's Administrative Decision, filed March 23, 2018 (Doc. 26)("Response"); Reply in Support

BENJAMIN, Acting C.J., concurring: (Filed July 28, 2008) Roseoe Pound offered the following pertinent comments as to a judge’s responsibility when setting forth an opinion: The opinions of the judge of a highest court of a state are no place for intemperate denunciation of the judge’s colleagues, violent invective, attributings of bad motives to the majority of the

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice, joined by RABINOWITZ, Justice, dissenting. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the Clearys’ cause of action is not ripe for adjudication. As explained below, there was evidence that the Clearys suffered irremedial damage as a result of Thomas’ negligence in liquidating their corporation. Therefore, I would affirm the jury's damage award. One theory which

719 So.2d 967 (1998) CENTRO NAUTICO REPRESENTACOES NAUTICAS, LDA., a Portuguese Limited Partnership; and Caravelle Boats, Inc., a Georgia corporation, Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL MARINE CO-OP, LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership, Appellee. Nos. 97-0548, 96-3885. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. October 14, 1998. Rehearing and Clarification

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice, dissenting. I dissent from the court’s conclusion that Williams made a knowing waiver of his right to the assistance of counsel. For, in my view, the inquiry by the superior court as to the benefits of counsel was inadequate *884and thus cannot sustain a finding of knowing waiver. In Swensen v. Municipality

OPINION Before MATTHEWS, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, BURKE, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ. MOORE, Justice. This case presents the question of whether the initial binder for an insurance policy providing coverage against uninsured motorists may be construed to provide coverage against underinsured motorists. I. Mr. and Mrs. Chung, having recently arriv

587 N.E.2d 66 (1992) 224 Ill. App.3d 999 167 Ill.Dec. 184 Ruth McCRAY, Indiv. and as Special Adm'r of the Estate of Avery McCray, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SALAH UDDIN SHAMS, M.D., S.C., and Kaukab M. Shams, Ex'r of the Estate of Salah Uddin Shams, Deceased, Defendants-Appellees. No. 2-91-0423. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District.

602 P.2d 448 (1979) George F. GOTTSCHALK, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee. No. 3721. Supreme Court of Alaska. November 9, 1979. *449 Charles G. Evans, Smith & Taylor, Anchorage, for appellant. Paul E. Olson, Asst. Dist. Atty., Joseph D. Balfe, Dist. Atty., Anchorage, Avrum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for

288 N.J. Super. 69 (1996) 671 A.2d 1080 LEONARD B. GREER AND L.C. WEGARD & CO., INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS/CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES AND A. JARED SILVERMAN, CHIEF, BUREAU OF SECURITIES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS/CROSS-RESPONDENTS. LEONARD B. GREER AND L.C. WEGARD & CO., INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES AND A. JARED SILVERMAN, CHIEF, BUREAU OF SECURITI

595 P.2d 648 (1979) William P. COOPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee. No. 3588. Supreme Court of Alaska. May 25, 1979. Dana Fabe, Steven G. Marks, Asst. Public Defenders, Brian C. Shortell, Public Defender, Anchorage, for appellant. Charles W. Cohen, Asst. Dist. Atty., Anchorage, Stephen H. Hutchings, Dist. Atty., Bethel, Joseph D. Balfe, Dist. Atty

581 P.2d 1129 (1978) Lewis C. LEDBETTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee. No. 3500. Supreme Court of Alaska. August 4, 1978. Phillip P. Weidner of Drathman, Weidner & Bryson, Anchorage, for appellant. Thomas B. Turnbull, Asst. Dist. Atty., Thomas M. Wardell, Dist. Atty., Kenai, and Avrum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee. Before BO

The opinion of the court was delivered by CARCHMAN, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned). J.N. is a thirteen-year-old profoundly disabled child suffering from neurological impairment, blindness and incontinence. He requires twenty-four hour care. Without question, because of his disabilities, he is entitled to a free education under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C.A. §§ 140

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge: Defendant Carol Publishing Group appeals from a February 13, 1990 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Louis L. Stanton, J., permanently enjoining it from publishing a biography in its present form, on grounds of copyright infringement. In an opinion reported at 729 F.Supp. 992, the district court held that

ELDRIDGE, Judge. We issued a writ of certiorari in this case to review the rulings by the courts below concerning the torts of malicious prosecution and false imprisonment, as well as the requirements for the allowability of punitive damages in malicious prosecution and false imprisonment actions. I. Frances Wilson filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County against M

616 P.2d 874 (1980) Michael A. SWENSEN, Appellant, v. MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, Appellee. No. 4675. Supreme Court of Alaska. September 26, 1980. *876 C. Walter Ebell, Cole, Hartig, Rhodes, Norman & Mahoney, Kodiak, for appellant. Karen L. Russell, Municipal Prosecutor, Anchorage, for appellee. Before RABINOWITZ

624 P.2d 790 (1981) CATERPILLAR TRACTOR COMPANY, Petitioner & Cross-Respondent, v. Paula BECK, Administratrix of the Estate of Derald Allen Beck, Respondent & Cross-Petitioner. Nos. 5350, 5351. Supreme Court of Alaska. February 27, 1981. *791 Lloyd I. Hoppner, Rice, Hoppner, Ingraham & Brown, Fairbanks, for petitioner

OPINION In this adoption appeal, B.K., who seeks to adopt his two step-children, challenges the superior court's determination that the children's natural father, D.C., retains his right to withhold consent to the adoption pursuant to AS 25.23.050.1 I. Facts and Proceedings Tanya and Dell were married in 1977. Their son J.B.K. was born in 1978 and their dau