Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge. Appellants Robert F. Rood, IV, and Charles Timothy Jewell appeal from a November 4, 2011, judgment against them in a bankruptcy adversary proceeding in accordance with a memorandum of decision issued September 26, 2011.1 The issues are fully briefed and the court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 105.6, no hearing being de

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Frederick J. Jennis filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging civil rights violations against several police officers from the City of Syracuse (“Syracuse defendants”), several John Doe jail deputies from Onondaga County Sheriffs Department (“Onondaga County defendants”), and the Onondaga County Sheriffs Department (“Department”). Jennis appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to amend

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Frederick J. Jennis filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging civil rights violations against several police officers from the City of Syracuse (“Syracuse defendants”), several John Doe jail deputies from Onondaga County Sheriffs Department (“Onondaga County defendants”), and the Onondaga County Sheriffs Department (“Department”). Jennis appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to amend

488 F.Supp.2d 172 (2007) Frederick Joseph JENNIS, Plaintiff, v. Duane ROOD, et al., Defendants. No. 5:03-CV-0772 (LEK/GHL). United States District Court, N.D. New York. January 16, 2007. *173 *174 Frederick Joseph Jennis, Syracuse, NY, Pro Se. Jeffrey P. Reisner, City of Syracuse Law De

755 N.W.2d 146 (2008) In re Ayden ROOD, Minor. Department of Human Services, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Darroll Donald Rood, Respondent-Appellee. Docket No. 136849. COA No. 280597. Supreme Court of Michigan. July 30, 2008. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED.

545 N.W.2d 138 (1996) 4 Neb.App. 455 Bonita Gail ROOD, Appellee, State of Nebraska, Intervenor-Appellee, v. Harry Burriel ROOD, Appellant. No. A-94-960. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. March 26, 1996. *139 David L. Kimble, Seward, for appellant. C. Jo Petersen, Seward County Attorney, for interven

CORRIGAN, J. The Department of Human Services (DHS) challenges reversal by the Court of Appeals of a circuit court order terminating the respondent father’s parental rights to his daughter. In re Rood, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued June 12, 2008 (Docket No. 280597). We affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals. As that court opined, respondent behaved as a “less-than-ideal parent” and “s

246 P.3d 69 (2010) 240 Or. App. 68 Frank ROOD and Mavis Rood, by and through Janet A. RICHARDS, Guardian ad litem; Frank B. Rood and Mavis E. Rood Trust, Frank Rood, Mavis Rood, and Janet A. Richards, Co-Trustees; James Smejkal; Jerald Humbert; and East Bay View Estates, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COOS COUNTY and State of Oregon, by and through the Department of Administrative Services and Department of Land Conservati

¶1 The parties before us agreed to resolve their underlying dispute in binding arbitration. Fluor Daniel, Inc., prevailed and moved to reduce the arbitration award to judgment. Concluding that the arbitration award liquidated previously nonliquidated damages, the trial court reduced that award to judgment and added prejudgment interest from the date the arbitrator rendered the award to the time it was entered into judgment. We conclude that an arbitration aw

Appellate Docket Number: 01-15-00355-CV Appellate Case Style: B & Sons Construction LLC v. United Rentals (North America) Vs. FILED IN Companion Case No.: none st

JUDGMENT CARMAN, Judge: This Court, having received and reviewed the United States Department of Agriculture’s Corrected Reconsideration upon the Application of Robert Rood, whereby Plaintiff was found to be eligible to receive benefits pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 2401e(b)(l) (Supp. II 2002), hereby ORDERS that the United States Department of Agriculture’s corrected reconsideration is affirm

MEMORANDUM ** Larry N. Rood appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees on Rood’s petition for review of the decision of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (“BCNR”). Rood contends that the district court erred in determining that he was discharged pursuant to a valid Naval regulation and that his claims of entitlement to pension benefits are non-justiciabl

JOHN F. FISCHER, Presiding Judge. T1 Petitioner/Appellant Jeanne French appeals a decision of the district court of Coal County. - The district court dismissed French's petition seeking judicial review of a Merit Protection Commission (MPC) decision on the grounds that the district court lacked Jurisdiction to hear her appeal, pursuant to 75 0.8.2001 § 318. The decision of the district court is affirmed.

790 So.2d 1192 (2001) Charles E. ROOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 1D01-794. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. July 30, 2001. Appellant pro se. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Karen Armstrong, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. *1193 PER CURIAM. <

OPINION DAMICH, Chief Judge. On August 4, 2003, Plaintiffs filed their complaint (hereinafter “Compl.”), which alleges, inter alia, that the United States Navy improperly discharged Mr. Rood from reserve duty. Compl. 116, at 3. Plaintiffs seek retirement pay, allowances, and benefits from May 1999 to the present; a determination that Mr. Rood is entitled to retirement pay henceforth; and a Survivor

Slip Op. 06-31 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE _________________________________________ : ROBERT ROOD, : : Plaintiff, : : Before: Carman, Judge v. :

936 A.2d 488 (2007) Richard G. ROOD, Appellant v. COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued July 11, 2007. Filed October 18, 2007. Reargument Denied December 21, 2007. *489 Joseph A. O'Keefe, Kutztown, for appellant. Edward J. Hayes, Philadelphia, for appel

6 Cal.Rptr.3d 746 (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 549 Richard van't ROOD, Plaintiff and Appellant; John PEREIRA et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, Defendant and Respondent. No. H023716 Court of Appeal, Sixth District November 20, 2003 *751 Law Offices of Craig J. Bassett, Craig J. Bas

246 P.3d 69 (2010) 240 Or. App. 68 Frank ROOD and Mavis Rood, by and through Janet A. RICHARDS, Guardian ad litem; Frank B. Rood and Mavis E. Rood Trust, Frank Rood, Mavis Rood, and Janet A. Richards, Co-Trustees; James Smejkal; Jerald Humbert; and East Bay View Estates, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COOS COUNTY and State of Oregon, by and through the Department of Administrative Services and Department of Land Conservati

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, District Judge. Plaintiff Don Campbell brings this claim against the Illinois Department of Corrections, Michael O’Leary, Howard Peters, Charles Williams, John Groves, Michael Lane and Carol Mills, alleging that defendants kept him imprisoned beyond his legal release date in violation of the Eighth Amendment and the due process clause of the Fourt