Cases

R. Brooke Jackson, United States District Judge Defendants Tyco Fire Products, Chemguard and 3M move to dismiss plaintiffs' medical monitoring claims, arguing that Colorado's appellate courts have not recognized such a cause of action. Tyco and Chemguard alternatively request that the issue be certified to the Colorado Supreme Court. Several other defendants ask to join one or both of the motions to dismiss. I decline to certify the

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0078p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ BRIAN ADAMS, et al., │ Plaintiffs-Ap

746 F.Supp.2d 1216 (2010) EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY, E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, Solutia, Inc., and Fire Ram International, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 3:09cv361/MCR/MD. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division. September 29, 2010. *1217 James Martin Corrigan, James M

SCHEDULE A MDL No. 2885 - IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Central District of California KENNEDY v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:19-00128 District of Minnesota CIACCIO v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:19-00179 PEEK v. 3M COMPANY, E

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1587 KOLON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00622-REP)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT HAROLD PENNINGTON AND NANCY : No. 59 EAL 2017 PENNINGTON : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from v. : the Order of the Superior Court : : UNITED STATES STEEL : CORPO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT HAROLD PENNINGTON AND NANCY : No. 60 EAL 2017 PENNINGTON : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from v. : the Order of the Superior Court : : UNITED STATES STEEL : CORPO

*1076ORDER AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. It is further ordered that the Application for Stay is DENIED.

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. It is further ordered that the Application for Stay is DENIED.

*1076ORDER AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. It is further ordered that the Application for Stay is DENIED.

*1076ORDER AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. It is further ordered that the Application for Stay is DENIED.

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. It is further ordered that the Application for Stay is DENIED.

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. It is further ordered that the Application for Stay is DENIED.

ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Home Design Services, Inc. (“Home Design”) filed this suit against Defendants for copyright infringement of an architectural home design titled “HDS-2089,” claiming that Defendants built 165 infringing homes as part of their “Lau*1205rent” and “Dakota” designs based on slightly modified

Opinion issued August 30, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00847-CV ——————————— ADAN G. ADAME, ROBERT H. ARISPE, HARVEY EDWARD ARNOLD, HERMON HARVEY ARNOLD, LUCIANO BARRIENTEZ, HOMER L. BATCHELOR, TOMAS BENITEZ, DELBERT RAY BLUNDELL, MELVIN BRION

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANN D. MONTGOMERY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On February 15, 2013, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral argument on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and on the parties’ motions to exclude expert testimony. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ summary judgment motion is denied. Plaintiffs summary judgment motio

MEMORANDÚM ORDER HON, LEONARD P. STARK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE . At Wilmington this 29th day of September, 2017: 1. Background. The parties'to this antitrust litigation are competitors in the market for telephone headsets sold to “enterprise” (also known ,as “contact center and office” or “CCO”) end-users. Plaintiff GN Netcom, Inc. (“GN”) filed this lawsuit on October 12, 20

The plaintiff appeals from a dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Ala.R.Civ.P., for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Marie Maro sued her former employer, Sizemore Security International, Inc., in August 1995, alleging that she had been wrongfully discharged from her employment in violation of §25-5-11.1, Ala. Code 1975. She alleged that she had been dismissed solely because she had filed a written notice of the violat

775 F.Supp.2d 613 (2011) ALL-STAR MARKETING GROUP, LLC, Merchant Media, LLC & Edison Nation, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. MEDIA BRANDS CO., LTD. & Saonjay Mirpur, Defendants. No. 10 Civ. 1764(RMB)(AJP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 3, 2011. *615 Adam M. Cohen, Jeffrey H. Daichman, Kane Kessler, P.C., Sarah

These appeals are from a summary judgment. In a previous appeal in this action, which appeal involved other defendants, our supreme court set forth some of the history of this case: "On July 3, 1989, an explosion at the 3M Corporation chemical plant in Decatur killed John Crawford, Jerry Wilkerson, and James Michael Martin and injured Joe Charles Rains. The four men were attempting to repair a leak in vessel 403-A-23, a 500-gallon chemical-blending tank, when the t