Cases

666 F.3d 1081 (2012) Sharon K. PALMER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. ILLINOIS FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. Sandra Kluessendorf, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. Progressive Preferred Insurance Company, Appellee. Michael Hara, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company, Appellee.

SHORT, J. Marc Palmer appeals his convictions for murder and possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime. He argues the trial court erred in: (1) granting the State’s Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), motion; (2) denying his motion for a mistrial and a motion for a new trial; (3) denying his motion for a speedy trial; (4) admitting his statement to law enforceme

*1085MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARK W. BENNETT, U.S. DISTRICT COURT, JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.. .1085 A. Procedural History ... 1085 B. Factual Findings... 1087

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA JIGLIOTTI FAMILY TRUST, ) ) Supreme Cou

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 25, 2014 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LEE C. PALMER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 97080 Steven W. Sword, Judge No. E2013-01516-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 6, 2014 Lee C. Palmer (“the Defendant”) was convicted by a jury of one count of felony reckless endangerment

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DEBORAH HARKER, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-1097-SEM ) KWANZA GRIMES and ) ASHLEY VOGEL, individually and ) as attorney in fact for ) BETTY B. HARKER )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-KA-00811-COA DYLAN CHASE DAVIS A/K/A DYLAN DAVIS APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/01/2023 COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: DESOTO COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER

833 F.2d 253 Clayton PALMER, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Richard L. DUGGER, Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General,Respondents- Appellees. No. 86-5394. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Dec. 1, 1987. Theodore J. Sakowitz, Federal Public Defender, Lisa A. Rosenthal, Asst. Federal Public Defender,

DAVIS, Justice: Deborah Kay Hams, administratrix of the Estate of Ronald K. Harris (“Petitioner”), appeals an order of the Circuit Court of Marshall County granting summary judgment in favor of CSX Transportation, Inc. (“CSX”). The circuit court granted summary judgment after ruling that Petitioner was precluded from calling her three expert witnesses at trial. The dispositive issue presented by the Petitioner in this appeal

575 F.Supp. 1259 (1984) William EILERS, Plaintiff, v. Mark Kingston PALMER, Deborah Ann Coy, Thomas Leroy Quick, Daniel Charles Graham, Joanne Mary Hansen, Thomas Shader, Steve Morin, Charlene Morin, Lloyd A. Morin, Jesse Eilers, Norman J. Eilers, Vance M. Smith, Kathryn G. Smith, Beth A. Haas, Henry J. Kaping, and Marilyn A. Kaping, Linda Morin, John Leif, Robert Lewis Brandyberry, Christopher Carlson, Larry Bizan, Vincent Jennings, and Academy

400 F.3d 1052 George HARPER and Robert Padilla, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Lieutenant ALBERT, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-2758. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued June 5, 2003. Decided March 17, 2005. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Alan S. Mills (argued), Uptown People's Law Center,

09/23/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 26, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE. v. RODGER DALE PRINCE AND AMANDA BEATY Appeal from the Criminal Court for Morgan County Nos. 2014-CR-43A Jeffery H. Wicks, Judge and 2014-CR-43B

278 Kan. 584 (2004) 102 P.3d 396 ROBERT BOOTH ROE, a Minor Child By and Through his Adoptive Parents, RICHARD ROE and JANET ROE, and JENNIFER BRUNETTI, Conservator, Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND REHABILITATION SERVICES FOR THE STATE OF KANSAS, THE STATE OF KANSAS, WAYNE SRAMEK, HERBERT HICKMAN, and MARY KEADY, Appellees. No. 89,462. Supreme Court of Kansas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case is before the court on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendants, Montgomery County Board of Education, Montgomery Public Schools, Dr. Clinton Carter,1 Jimmy Barker, Tina Minott, Michael Gibbs, and Myra Hardy (Doc. # 25).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 16-0110 Filed February 8, 2017 IN RE ESTATE OF MILTON A. BOMAN, deceased WESLEY BOMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CYNTHIA CRAMER, Individually and as Executor, and TRUDY BURFORD, Defendants-Appellants. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Hancock County, Gregg R. Rosenbladt, Judge.

472 F.Supp.2d 172 (2007) Albert L. GRAY, Administrator, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jeffrey DERDERIAN, et al., Defendants. Estate of Jude B. Henault, et al., Plaintiffs, v. American Foam Corporation, et al., Defendants. In re Motions to Dismiss of Defendants Polar Industries, Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. C.A. Nos. 04-312L, 03-483L. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island.</

PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE, Judge. Janet Chochorowski filed a class-action lawsuit against Home Depot, claiming that Home Depot violated the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MMPA), section 407.010 et seq.,1 by automatically including a damage waiver fee in its tool rental agreement that Ms. Chochorowski signed when she rented a garden tiller. She also claimed the tool ren

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING SAWAYA, J. Appellee has filed a motion for rehearing stating that he “does not contest the *1166court’s analysis with respect to the canal.” He does contend, however, that summary judgment in Bischoffs favor regarding the land underlying the pertinent part of the lake bordering her property is inappropriate becaus

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants on two claims and judgment as a matter of law (JAML) on the remaining claims following opening statements, in this diversity action. We reverse and remand for trial. *385 I

OPINION BY President Judge LEADBETTER. This case, on remand from our Supreme Court, involves a challenge to the constitutionality of the Private Road Act (PRA).1 *294This case began when Timothy P. O’Reilly filed a Petition for the Appointment of a Board of Viewers pursuant to the PRA, for the purpose of creating a private