Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “ROBERT P. GARCIA and SHANNON A. GARCIA”
In re Garcia on Admissionpublic domain
CHIN, J., Concurring.—The majority opinion does not acknowledge it, but just over three years ago, in Martinez v. Regents of University of California (2010) 50 Cal.4th 1277 [117 Cal.Rptr.3d 359, 241 P.3d 855], this court specifically considered how to designate persons in Garcia’s position, and we unanimously rejected the term the majority uses, “undocumented immigrant,” in favor of a term we believed was mor
Garcia v. Statepublic domain
904 P.2d 144 (1995) Antonio De Jesus GARCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. F-93-695. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. September 29, 1995. John Herndon, Chickasha, for appellant at trial. Allen Smith, Asst. Appellate Indigent Defender, Norman, for appellant on appeal. Robert Beal & Martha Shannon, Asst. District Attorneys,
Garcia-Jarquin v. Statepublic domain
314 Ga. 555 FINAL COPY S22A0727. GARCIA-JARQUIN v. THE STATE. COLVIN, Justice. Following a jury trial, Appellant Ylarrio Garcia-Jarquin was convicted of malice murder, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony in connection with the shooting death of Edel Mendoza and the aggravated assault of Miguel Canil.1 Appellant claims that the evidence presented at trial 1 On October 10, 2016, a Cherokee County grand jury indic
Robert Shannon Smith v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Opinion filed July 14, 2022 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ____________ Nos. 11-20-00215-CR & 11-20-00216-CR ____________ ROBERT SHANNON SMITH, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 35th District Court Brown C
Perez v. Abbottpublic domain
ORDER ON PLAN H358 XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This Order addresses Plaintiffs’ statutory and constitutional claims against Plan H358, enacted by the 83rd Texas Legislature in 2013. The following Plaintiffs assert claims against Plan H358: The Texas Latino Redistricting Task Force1 (limited to HD90), MALC,2 th
Brown v. Kelloggpublic domain
OPINION GARCIA, Judge. Plaintiff, Deborah Brown, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor ofDefendants, Robert Kellogg, M.D., Robert Olsen, M.D., and Presbyterian Healthcare Services d/b/a Kaseman Presbyterian Hospital. Plaintiff contends the district court erred in failing to recognize that Defendants had a legal duty to order that
Garcia v. Penske Logistics, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Marina Garcia Marmolejo, United States District Judge On May 29, 2013, Plaintiff Yvette Garcia filed the instant action against her former *548employer Defendant Penske Logistics, LLC (“Penske”), alleging that Penske terminated her because of her sex (female) in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Garcia v. Gutierrezpublic domain
217 P.3d 591 (2009) 2009-NMSC-044 Angelina GARCIA, formerly known as Angelina Gutierrez, Petitioner-Petitioner, v. Matthew GUTIERREZ, Respondent-Respondent. No. 31,263. Supreme Court of New Mexico. August 26, 2009. *592 Atkinson & Kelsey, P.A., Thomas C. Montoya, Albuquerque, NM, for Petitioner.
Garcia v. E.J. Amusements of New Hampshire, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Jorge García1 brings this proposed class action against Fiesta Shows,2 a company that provides rides and attractions to fairs and carnivals throughout New England. Garcia alleges that Fiesta Shows violated minimum wage and overtime laws in Massachusetts and New Hampshire (Counts 1-2, 4-5);
Garcia v. Frog Island Seafood, Inc.public domain
644 F.Supp.2d 696 (2009) Mercedalia Hernandez GARCIA, Mirelda Garcia Dominguez, Mareli Cupil Zapata, Maria Zapata Arias, Yaimi Cupil Zapata and Juan Cupil Arias, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. FROG ISLAND SEAFOOD, INC., Robert D. White and Janice White Harris, Defendants. No. 2:06-CV-46-F. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Nor
United Neurology, P.A. v. Hartford Lloyd's Insurancepublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, removed from state court on diversity jurisdiction and arising out of damage to the roofs and interiors of Plaintiffs United Neurology, P.A. and Athari Real Estate Ltd.’s properties located at 2315 and 2321 Southwest Freeway, Harris County, Texas, purportedly during Hurricane Ike and Plaint
Dow Chemical Co. v. Garciapublic domain
909 S.W.2d 503 (1995) The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Relator, v. The Honorable Ricardo H. GARCIA, Judge, Respondent. The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Relator, v. The Honorable Gary SANDERSON, Judge, Respondent. Nos. 95-0505, 95-0633. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued October 10, 1995. Decided November 2, 1995. *504
Shannon Blane Sessums v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-14-00017-CR SHANNON BLANE SESSUMS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 6th District Court Red River County, Texas Trial Court No. CR02060 Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
United States v. Ruben Rocha, Thomas Padilla, Hector Garcia-Garcia, Johnny Robert Hinojosa, and Jose Santos Gallegospublic domain
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge: Defendants-appellants Ruben Rocha (“Rocha”), Thomas Padilla (“Padilla”), Hector Garcia-Garcia (“Garcia”), Johnny Robert Hinojosa (“Hinojosa”) and Jose Santos Gallegos (“Gallegos”) were convicted on various federal criminal charges arising from the kidnapping of Michael Baker. All of the defendants have appealed their convictions and sentences on numerous
Norris Shannon Baines v. Statepublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice MOSELEY. For the sake of clarity, we withdraw our opinion rendered in the matter September 1, 2010, and issue this opinion in replacement of it. Norris Shannon Baines appeals his Angelina County conviction for the state jail felony of evading detention and sentence of 180 days in the c
CHIEF JUSTICE RUBEN MORIN ROBERT D. BURNS, III CLERK OF THE COURT (214) 712-3400 JUSTICES theclerk@5th.txcourts.gov KEN MOLBERG ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS MYRNA GASC BILL PED
Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. Garciapublic domain
BIERY, Justice, concurring. I concur with the opinion of Chief Justice Reeves. As set forth by the majority in Section C of the opinion, the constitutionality of a statute must be viewed from the perspective of whether the means are appropriate and reasonably necessary to accomplish the objective and whether the statute operates in an arbitrary or unjust manner. Ultimately, such a decision is a judgment call
Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. Garciapublic domain
817 S.W.2d 60 (1991) TEXAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION, et al., Appellants, v. Hector GARCIA, Jr., et al., Appellees. No. D-1516. Supreme Court of Texas. October 16, 1991. *61 Joe Pitner, Shannon H. Ratliff, Dan Morales, Delmar L. Cain, Harry G. Potter, III, Frank Oliver and Scott Moore, Austin, for appellants. Robert
Norris Shannon Baines v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-10-00069-CR ______________________________ NORRIS SHANNON BAINES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 217th Judicial District Court Angelina County, Texas Trial Court No. 29,109 Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and
Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. Garciapublic domain
SPECTOR, Justice, joined by HIGHTOWER and GAMMAGE, Justices, concurring and dissenting. Texans have long recognized that the right of trial by jury is “the only safe guarantee for the life, liberty, and property of the citizen.” 1 Today’s decision undermines that guarantee by allowing the Legislature to a