Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “ROBERT F GOTT”
State v. Gottpublic domain
JEFFREY W. BATES, P.J. After a jury trial, Howard Gott (Defendant) was convicted of second-degree assault and armed criminal action. Athough Defendant presents ten points on appeal, the- alleged errors' fall into two- groups: challenges to the admission of 'various statements pursuant to the excited-utterance exception to the hearsay rule (Points 1 through 4); and challenges to the admission of evidence relating to Defendant
Gott v. Norbergpublic domain
417 A.2d 1352 (1980) Fred A. GOTT, Jr. and Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co., Executors of the Estate of Rathbun Willard v. John H. NORBERG, Tax Administrator. No. 77-436-M.P. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. July 8, 1980. Reargument Denied August 28, 1980. *1355 Armstrong, Gibbons, Lodge & Kinder, Walter F. Gibb
Gott v. Robert E. Anderson, Inc.public domain
Banks, J. This is an action for breach of contract to survey an undeveloped parcel of land in North Reading, Massachusetts owned by the plaintiff. The reported evidence indicates that in October, 1985, the plaintiff orally engaged defendant Robert E. Anderson, Inc., a land surveying firm, to survey and mark the realty in question and to prepare a plot plan. The defendant firm quoted a price for its services “be
People v. Gottpublic domain
26 Cal.App.4th 881 (1994) 31 Cal. Rptr.2d 840 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GWENDOLYN RAE GOTT, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. C012093. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. July 8, 1994. *883 COUNSEL James H. Dippery, Jr., for Defendant and Appellant. Daniel E. Lung
Robert Gacho v. Anthony Willspublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-3343 ROBERT GACHO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ANTHONY WILLS, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Di
Jsc Transmashholding v. Millerpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge JSC Transmashholding (“Transmash-holding”), the plaintiff in this civil matter, has alleged that the defendants, James F. Miller (“Miller”) and Chris Taylor (“Taylor”), are liable for conversion and unjust enrichment under District of Columbia law. See Complaint (the “C
United States v. Taylorpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KARON OWEN BOWDRE, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendant John Robert Taylor has a history of schizophrenia, severe alcohol abuse, and numerous felony convictions. He lives in a van outside of Pickensville, Alabama without power or running water and is known to hear voices and speak to those voices. After an altercation in which Mr. Taylor attempted to fire a loaded g
State v. Gottpublic domain
BRYANT, J. This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Auglaize County. This case originated in the Juvenile Division of the Auglaize County Court of Common Pleas with the filing of a complaint charging James David Gott (David) with delinquency. The charges alleged the commission of Aggravated Murder, Rape, and Breaking and Entering. The Auglaize County Prosecutor
Collinson v. Gottpublic domain
PER CURIAM: This case presents novel and important constitutional issues growing out of a citizen’s claim that his first amendment rights were violated when the president of a board of county commissioners ruled him out of order while he was addressing a called public meeting and then had him evicted. In Joseph Collinson’s action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against John M. Gott, President of the Board of Co
Gott v. Walterspublic domain
WALD, Circuit Judge, dissenting: In 1979, the Veterans’ Administration (“VA”) issued three documents concerning the standards and procedures for determining when veterans exposed to radiation by the United States Government are entitled to VA disability benefits. In 1981, the plaintiffs sought a judicial ruling that these *208documents were agency “rules”
Brown, Robert Ford IIIpublic domain
Abel 4cos4 c~ MOTION DENIED DATE: U-1UMC BY: (>0 CCHWTOFCRIMINAL APPEALS APR 23 2015 AtettoStt.Gterk Can v^o flease f;if -Ws 6^5^e^ /l^io^ fox ^cc-ess -Vo'CooHs' 3^ p^s-^ >i; ^° 4l€ ^e0^ Sc, ^^ Ca^ fi/*- "^ ©^ -tL-e. dooke-4 *Set Ate^rl^. J/ie^r-ely^ i
NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of Argentinapublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS P. GRIESA, District Judge. Plaintiffs in these forty-nine actions hold defaulted bonds issued by defendant, the Republic of Argentina. Plaintiffs have already obtained partial summary judgment *517that the Republic violated, and continues to violate, the pari passu clause of the underlying bond agreement
State Of Washington, V. Robert M. Fleeks, Jr.public domain
NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur
New York v. Shinnecock Indian Nationpublic domain
523 F.Supp.2d 185 (2007) State of NEW YORK, New York State Racing and Wagering Board, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and Town of Southampton, Plaintiffs, v. The SHINNECOCK INDIAN NATION, Frederick C. Bess, Lance A. Gumbs, Randall King, and Karen Hunter, Defendants. Town of Southampton, Plaintiff, v. The Shinnecock Tribe a/k/a the Shinnecock Indian Nation, Frederick C. Bess, Lance A. Gumbs, and Randall King, D
New York v. Shinnecock Indian Nationpublic domain
(2008) State of NEW YORK, New York State Racing and Wagering Board, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and Town of Southampton, Plaintiffs, v. The SHINNECOCK INDIAN NATION, Frederick C. Bess, Lance A. Gumbs, Randall King, and Karen Hunter, Defendants. Town of Southampton, Plaintiff, v. The Shinnecock Tribe a/k/a The Shinnecock Indian Nation, Frederick C. Bess, Lance A. Gumbs, and Randall King, Defendants.
313 B.R. 189 (2004) In re HAYES LEMMERZ INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Debtors. HLI Creditor Trust, Plaintiff, v. Export Corp., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 01-11490MFW. Adversary No. 03-57443. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. July 27, 2004. *190 Michael W. Yurkewicz, Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg & Ellers, Phila
United States v. Robert Harry Gouldpublic domain
PER CURIAM: This is an appeal by Robert Harry Gould from his conviction on two counts of (1) knowingly smuggling and clandestinely introducing marihuana into the United States and (2) knowingly concealing and facilitating the transportation and concealment of marihuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a. We affirm.
Mitchell v. City of LaFayettepublic domain
PER CURIAM: Appellants Freddie Mitchell and Johnet-ta McSears appeal the district court’s grant of defendant City of LaFayette’s (“City”) motion for summary judgment in their employment discrimination suit under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)(1). On appeal, Mitchell and McSears argue that plaintiffs may establish a prima facie case of age discrimination in a reduction-i
HLI Creditor Trust v. Keller Rigging Construction, Inc. (In Re Hayes Lemmerz International Inc.)public domain
312 B.R. 44 (2004) In re HAYES LEMMERZ INTERNATIONAL INC., et al., Debtors. HLI Creditor Trust, Plaintiff, v. Keller Rigging Construction, Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 01-11490MFW, Adversary No. 03-56981. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. July 20, 2004. James S. Yoder, White and Williams, LLP, Brian A. Sullivan, Werb & Sullivan, Robert K. Beste
756 F.2d 902 244 U.S.App.D.C. 193, 53 USLW 2476 Chris L. GOTT, et al.v.Harry N. WALTERS, Administrator of Veterans' Affairs,Veterans' Administration, et al., Appellants.Chris L. GOTT, et al.v.Harry N. WALTERS, et al., Appellants.Chris L. GOTT, et al.v.Harry N. WALTERS, et al., Appellants. Nos. 82-1159, 82-1448 and 82-1454. United Stat