Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “RMR Operating, LLC”
Filed 6/11/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT RMR EQUIPMENT RENTAL, B302772 INC., (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. PC056872) v. RESIDENTIAL FUND 1347, LLC, et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from a judgm
Perkins v. RMR Building Grouppublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 01/29/2026 11:06 PM CST - 707 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 320 Nebraska Reports PERKINS V. RMR BUILDING GROUP Cite as 320 Neb. 707 Perkins, L.L.C., a Nebraska limited liability
Perkins v. RMR Building Grouppublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 01/23/2026 08:09 AM CST - 707 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 320 Nebraska Reports PERKINS V. RMR BUILDING GROUP Cite as 320 Neb. 707 Perkins, L.L.C., a Nebraska limited liability
Good v. RMR Investments, Inc.public domain
428 B.R. 249 (2010) Kenneth Marston GOOD, et. al., Appellant, v. RMR INVESTMENTS, INC., Appellee. No. 4:09-cv-319. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division. March 31, 2010. *250 Paul B. Geilich of Wright Ginsberg Brusilow, PC, Catherine Ashley Ellis and Frank Jennings Wright of Hance Scarborough Wright Ginsberg
NUMBER 13-23-00135-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 3HM TRUCKING, LLC, MICHAEL JEROME WRIGHT, PRESTIGE GUNITE, INC., JESUS MARIA ROSALES, III, TRI-NATIONAL, INC., AND RMR DRIVER SERVICES, INC., Appellants, v. JOANN CARR ELIZONDO, ET AL., Appellees.
H&B Realty, LLC v. JJ Cars, LLCpublic domain
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2021 ME 14 Docket: BCD-20-82 Submitted On Briefs: September 29, 2020 Decided: March 23, 2021 Panel: MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HUMPHREY, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ. Majority: MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, and HUMPHREY, JJ. Dissent: CONNORS and HORTON, JJ. H&B REALTY, LLC v.
Filed 3/30/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT FOXCROFT PRODUCTIONS, B303161 INC., et al., Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. BC683206 v. UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS LLC, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Sup
Vitali v. Reit Management & Research, LLCpublic domain
Kaplan, Mitchell H., J. The plaintiff, Donna Vitali, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, filed this action against the defendant, Reit Management & Research LLC (RMR), asserting claims for violation of G.L.c. 151, §1A, the statute governing overtime compensation (Count I), breach of contract (Count II), and unjust enrichment/quantum meruit (Count III). Thereafter, Vitali voluntarily elected not to pursue
ACCEPTED 15-25-00003-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/6/2025 4:50 PM
Coastal Ventures v. Alsham Plaza, LLCpublic domain
1 A.3d 416 (2010) 2010 ME 63 COASTAL VENTURES et al. v. ALSHAM PLAZA, LLC, et al. Docket: BCD-09-362. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued: May 19, 2010. Decided: July 20, 2010. *417 Charles E. Gilbert, III, Esq. (orally), Julie D. Farr, Esq., Gilbert & Greif, P.A., Bangor, ME, for
564 F.Supp.2d 70 (2008) CULEBRA II, LLC, Plaintiff v. RIVER CRUISES AND ANTICIPATION YACHTS, LLC, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 07-13-P-H. United States District Court, D. Maine. July 9, 2008. *72 Richard P. Olson, Perkins Olson, Portland, ME, for Plaintiff. Bruce B. Hochman, Lambert Coffin, Portland, ME, for Defendants.</
In re Texas Star Refreshments, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT L. JONES, Bankruptcy Judge. On October 17, and October 29, 2012, hearing was held on the chapter 11 plans, as amended, of related debtors Texas Star Refreshments, LLC and Rodney Wayne and Donna Lynn Wilson [Docket No. 113, Case No. 11-50867; Docket No. 88, Case No. 11-50396]. Creditor Custom Food Group, LP objects to confirmation of both plans. For purposes of this Memora
ACCEPTED 15-25-00019-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/21/2025 10:35 AM NO. 15-25-00019-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRI
314 B.R. 436 (2004) In re PROALERT, LLC, Debtor. Security Leasing Partners, LP, Appellant, v. ProAlert, LLC, Appellee. BAP No. AZ-03-1601-PBD. Bankruptcy No. 03-17193-CGC. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted on June 24, 2004. Filed September 1, 2004. *437 Thomas
PPL EnergyPlus, LLC v. Hannapublic domain
MEMORANDUM SHERIDAN, District Judge. This non-jury case was tried before the Court over thirteen separate days in April and May, 2013. After trial, the parties submitted proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law as well as briefs, and thereafter, summations were heard. The Court, having considered the parties’ submissions and having deliberated over the facts and the law, submits this memorandum as
White Lion Holdings, LLC v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-14-00104-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/26/2015 8:21:49 PM
DIALOGO, LLC v. Bauzapublic domain
467 F.Supp.2d 115 (2006) DIALOGO, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs v. Lillian Santiago BAUZÁ, et al., Defendants. No. 05-30076-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 18, 2006. *116 *117 George P. Field, Verrill Dana, LLP, Boston, MA, Seth W. Brewster, Verrill Dana, LLP, Portland,
FENN, District Judge. [¶1] Appellants, QEP Energy Company (“QEP”) and Wexpro Company (“Wexpro”) appeal the district court’s decision on cross summary judgment motions, the verdict and final judgment that found them liable for more than thirty million dollars in unpaid royalties, and the district court's denial of their motion for a new trial. We reverse and remand.
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND. GARLAND, Circuit Judge. This case raises the question of whether FERC’s rejection of a PPL-ISO-NE RMR agreement covering CTs in a NE-POOL DCA violates the APA because FERC ignored PPL’s objections to FERC’s PUSH and LMP assumptions. 1 We conc
ACCEPTED 05-15-01002-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/10/2015 12:29:40 PM