Cases

ROBIN L. ROSENBERG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant RM Broadcasting, LLC's ("RM Broadcasting") Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [DE 26] and Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff the United States Department of Justice's ("the Department") Cross-Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [DE 30]. The Court has carefully considered both Motions, the Responses and Replies thereto [DE 32, 35, and

ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPLETE THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION In this case, Plaintiffs challenge (1) the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service” or “FWS”) to withdraw the proposed listing of the Bi-State Sage-Grouse as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-1544, and (2) the new listing poli

Tax refund claim; Trial; Exchange of radio stations; Like-kind exchange — section 1031 of the Code; Goodwill — qualitative and quantitative aspects; Significant goodwill not transferred in exchange of radio stations; Class lives of depreciable property — sections 167 and 168 of the Code; Air conditioning equipment reclassified; Other assets received proper class lives; Refund process- established.

OPINION OF THE COURT JORDAN, Circuit Judge. For five days in September 2013, lane closures on the George Washington Bridge caused extraordinary traffic jams in Fort Lee, New Jersey. The closures were allegedly orchestrated as revenge against the Mayor of Fort Lee for his refusal to endorse New Jersey Governor Christopher J. Christie in the Governor’s bid

ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants Shah Rahman (“Rahman”) and Caribbean Crescent, Inc.’s (“CCI”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. 60] (the “Motion”). For the following reasons, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ Motion. I. Background This case arises

ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3

FILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/19/2025 4:35:10 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk FILED: 2/6/2025 10:26 AM David Trantham Denton County District Clerk

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES; No. 20-71765 LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES; CITY OF GLENDORA, FCC No. CALIFORNIA; CITY OF RANCHO 19-250 PALOS VERDES; CITY OF TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA, OPINION Petitioners, CITY OF COCONUT CREEK, FLORIDA; CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS, CALIFORNIA; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS OFFICERS AND ADVISORS; TOWN OF BRECKE

In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 13-402, 13-917, 13-935, 13-972, 14-47, 14-93, 14-174, 14-175, 17-997 (Filed: 8 July 2026) * *************************************** ALTA WIND I OWNER LESSOR C, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATE

Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di

ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

275 P.3d 438 (2012) 2012 WY 51 OPERATION SAVE AMERICA, Appellant (Defendant), v. The CITY OF JACKSON, a Wyoming municipal corporation, Appellee (Plaintiff). No. S-11-0149. Supreme Court of Wyoming. April 10, 2012. *442 Representing Appellant: Jack D. Edwards of Edwards Law Office, P.C., Etna, Wyoming.

ACCEPTED 01-15-00774-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/8/2015 6:53:36

Fourth Amendment Implications of Military Use of Forward Looking Infrared Radars Technology for Civilian Law Enforcement Forw ard L ooking In frared R adars (FL IR ) reconnaissance o f structures on private lan d s does not constitute a search w ithin the m eaning o f the Fourth A m endm ent. D epartm ent o f D efen se personnel engaged in such surveillance would not be su b ject to liability for dam ages in a constitutional tort action.

ACCEPTED 03-16-00521-CV 12435072 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 8, 2024 Decided August 1, 2025 No. 23-1261 IGAS HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT AIR-CONDITIONING, HEATING, AND REFRIGERATION INSTITUTE AND ALLIANCE FOR RESPONSIBLE ATMOSPHERIC POLICY,

742 F.Supp.2d 784 (2010) R.M.S. TITANIC, INC., successor-in-interest to Titanic Ventures, limited partnership, Plaintiff, v. The WRECKED AND ABANDONED VESSEL, Its Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Appurtenances, Cargo, etc., Located Within One (1) Nautical Mile of a Point Located at 41 43' 32" North Latitude and 49 56' 49" West Longitude, Believed to be the R.M.S. Titanic, In Rem, Defendant. No. 2:93cv902. Uni

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BENJAMIN P. ALLEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-cv-01650 (TSC) ) MARY P. ADDI, et al., )

383 F.Supp.2d 944 (2005) Kelly HARCOURT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 1:02-CV-283. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. August 18, 2005. *945 *946 *947 Randolph Harry Freking, Sheila M. Smith