Cases

Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER GRANTING EMPLOYER AND PLAN DEFENDANTS’ OMNIBUS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6), AS WELL AS 12(B)(2), (4), AND (5), 20(A) AND 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A) [1062] [1070] [1071] [1072] [1075] [1077] [1078] [1080] [1081] [1082] [1083] [1084] [1085] [1086] [1088] [1089] [1090] [1091] [1092]. [1093] [1094] [1095] [1096] [1097] [1098] [1100] [1101] [1105] [1106] [1107] [1108] [1109] [1110]

601 F.3d 505 (2010) RIVERVIEW HEALTH INSTITUTE LLC; Middletown Surgical Associates Inc., dba Surgical Weight Loss Center; Oak Leaf Health Group LLC, dba St. Elizabeth's Laboratories, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MEDICAL MUTUAL OF OHIO; Kent W. Clapp; David G. Quiring; Kathy Schneeberger, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-4431. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: Octo

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO COMPEL (Docs. 59 and 63) TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge. This civil action is before the Court on Defendants’ and Plaintiffs motions to compel (Docs. 59 and 63) non-party subpoena recipient Community Insurance Company d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield (“Anthem”) to produce documents. Anthem has

MELLOY, Circuit Judge. Air Evac EMS, Inc. ("Air Evac") asserts numerous claims against USAble Mutual Insurance Company, d/b/a Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield ("Arkansas Blue"), regarding Arkansas Blue's allegedly inadequate reimbursement for air ambulance services that Air Evac provided to Arkansas Blue plan members. The district court

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Lori Woida and Carolyn Viera are former employees of Genesys Regional Medical Center. They are suing their former employer and their former supervisor, Jennifer Roth, for alleged violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act. This matter is present

*229MEMORANDUM O’NEILL, District Judge. Plaintiff DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. initiated the present action seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages against defendants Globus Medical, Inc., Michael Foley, Jeremy Leary and Michael Valeri in connection with Globus Medical’s alleged poaching of DePuy Synthes’ employees, customer relationships and good

OPINION AND ORDER Ramos, District Judge. Four Chiropractors, Timothy Merrick, D.C, (“Merrick”), Joshua Kantor D.C. (“Kantor”), Jason Piken, D.C. (“Piken”), and Craig Fishel D.C. (“Fishel,” and collectively “Plaintiffs”), assert a class action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, against UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, UnitedHealthcare, Inc., Uni-tedHealthcare Services, Inc., Opt

763 F.Supp.2d 956 (2011) Rhonda MOLING, Plaintiff, v. O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC., Defendant. No. 09-1100. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division. January 13, 2011. *958 Teresa A. Luna, Spragins Barnett & Cobb, Jackson, TN, for Plaintiff. Melissa A. Maravich, Mary C. Hamm, Burch Porter & Johns

LINARES, Chief District Judge. This matter comes before the Court by way of cross-motions for partial summary judgment by Plaintiff Relator Laurie Simpson, (ECF No. 324), and Defendants Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare *397Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Bayer Healthcare, LLC (collectively, "Bayer"), (ECF No. 323). Bayer has opposed Relator's m

*348 OPINION AND ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge: In these three coordinated actions, neurosurgeons associated with the plaintiff Neuroaxis Neurosurgical Associates, PC (“Neuroaxis”) seek payment from welfare benefit plans for close to 200 surgical procedures performed on plan members. Neuroaxis has sued Sprint Nextel Corporation (“Sprint

OPINION THE HONORABLE DONALD H. STECKROTH, BANKRUPTCY JUDGE The Court is presented with a motion (“Motion”) filed by the Debtors that seeks an order pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 502(b) and Rules 2019, 8001, and 3007 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure granting the Debtors’ omnibus objection to the claims filed by the New England Health Care Employees Union, District 1119, SEIU (the “Union”)

[Cite as Handy v. Patriot Mgt. & Invest. Co., 2026-Ohio-1627.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAWRENCE COUNTY BEULAH M. HANDY, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 24CA11 v. : PATRIOT MANAGEMENT & : INV

BIANCO, J.T.C. This constitutes the court’s formal opinion following trial, with regard to the profit test stage of a property tax exemption determination pursuant to N.J.S.A. 54:4-3.6, concerning property owned by plaintiff, AHS Hospital Corp., d/b/a Morristown Memorial Hospital1 (the “Hospital”), located within defendant, Town of Morristown, a Municipal Corporation of the State