Cases

Lewin Powell III v. State of Maryland, No. 0721, Sept. Term 2022. Opinion by Arthur, J. UNIFORM POSTCONVICTION PROCEDURE ACT—EXTRAORDINARY CAUSE Under section 7-103(b) of the Criminal Procedure Article (“CP”) of the Maryland Code (2001, 2018 Repl. Vol.), a petition for post-conviction relief “may not be filed more than ten years after the sentence was imposed” “[u]nless extraordinary cause is shown[.]” Extraordinary cause is not defined by statute, but it has been interpreted by the Maryland a

Lewin Powell III v. State of Maryland, No. 0721, Sept. Term 2022. Opinion by Arthur, J. UNIFORM POSTCONVICTION PROCEDURE ACT—EXTRAORDINARY CAUSE Under section 7-103(b) of the Criminal Procedure Article (“CP”) of the Maryland Code (2001, 2018 Repl. Vol.), a petition for post-conviction relief “may not be filed more than ten years after the sentence was imposed” “[u]nless extraordinary cause is shown[.]” Extraordinary cause is not defined by statute, but it has been interpreted by the Maryland a

642 F.Supp.2d 493 (2009) SHELL TRADEMARK MANAGEMENT BV & MOTIVA ENTERPRISES, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. RAY THOMAS PETROLEUM COMPANY, INC. & L. Ray Thomas, Defendants. No. 3:07cv163-RJC. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. June 15, 2009. *496 Laurie Ann Sullivan, Paul D. Sanson, Vaughan Finn, S

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion.

320 Ga. 221 FINAL COPY S24A0591. WILLIAMS et al. v. POWELL et al. ELLINGTON, Justice. After being arrested and charged with violating OCGA § 16-11- 34.1, which criminalizes conduct that is likely to disrupt meetings and other official business of the General Assembly and its members and employees, the appellants in this case brought suit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief that would prevent any enforcement of that Code section.1 The a

847 F.Supp. 444 (1993) Ernest POWELL, et al. v. B.P. CHEMICALS, INC. et al. Civ. A. No. 93-447-B. United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana. November 15, 1993. *445 Charles R. Moore, Edward J. Walters, Jr., John Chandler Loupe, Moore, Walters & Shoenfelt, Baton Rouge, LA, for Ernest Powell, Cheryl Powell Criss, Ernest Wayn

Banke, Judge. In this appeal from his conviction for selling cocaine in violation of the Controlled Substances Act, the appellant contends that he was found guilty solely on the basis of the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice. The appellant was jointly indicted for the offense along with two other persons, Bradford Lee Cofield and Quinton Emanuel Maddox. Testifying against the appellant and Maddox

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEVEN POWELL, § § Claimant-Below, § No. 151, 2019 Appellant, § § Court Below: v. § Superior Court § of the State of Delaware OTAC, INC., d/b/a HARDEE’S, §

PER CURIAM. Capstone Bank challenges the trial court’s order finding that an Alabama divorce judgment obtained by former wife Christy Richards constitutes a charging order that has priority over the charging order issued to Capstone Bank in this proceeding, each regarding the former husband’s membership interest in Perry-Clifton Enterprises, LLC, a Florida limited liability company.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEVEN POWELL, K18A-06-001 WLW Claimant Below- Appellant, v. OTAC, INC., d/b/a HARDEE’S, Employer BelOW- Appellee. Submitted: January 2, 20 l 9 Decided: March 5, 2019 ORDER Upon an Appeal from the Decision of the Industrial Accident Board. Ajj‘irmed. Walt F. Schmittinger, Esquire and Candace E. Holmes, Esquire of Schmittinger and Rodriguez, P.A., Dover, Delaware; attorneys for Appellant. Andrew M. Lukashunas, Esquire of Tybout Redfearn & Pell

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: Marvin W. Powell was convicted of federal drug and firearms offenses and sentenced to 300 months’ imprisonment, and his conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct review. Powell then filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his conviction and sentence on numerous grounds, most of which were based on his claim that his trial counsel provided h

MYERS, P.J., for the Court. ¶ 1. At issue in this appeal is whether the Chancery Court of Sunflower County erred in denying Dorothy Ray and Richard Gregory Ray’s1 petition for redetermination of heirs of the decedent, Jennifer Marie Ray. Robert Dean Ray, individually and on behalf of Floyd Malcolm Ray, II and David Glen Ray2, argues that he is entitled to

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  No. 11-6152 TROY NAMAN POWELL, a/k/a Troy Norman Powell, Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. R

237 Ga. 490 (1976) 228 S.E.2d 875 POWELL v. THE STATE. 31273. Supreme Court of Georgia. Submitted June 25, 1976. Decided September 8, 1976. Robert C. Ray, for appellant. *493 Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Richard E. Hicks, Assistant District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolto

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0300p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plain

220 Kan. 168 (1976) 551 P.2d 902 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ROY NELSON POWELL a/k/a RAY NELSON POWELL, Appellant. No. 48,197 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed June 12, 1976. Richard T. Merker, of Wallace, Saunders, Austin, Brown & Enochs, of Overland Park, argued the cause and was on the brief for the appellant. D

FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., MERCIER and COLVIN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,378 BRENT RAY BREWER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON DIRECT APPEAL FROM CAUSE NO. 6997-A IN THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT RANDALL COUNTY K ELLER, P.J., delivered the opi

EBEL, Circuit Judge. Appellant Richard Ray Lacey (“Lacey”) appeals from his convictions and sentence on various drug-related offenses. On appeal, Lacey complains that: (1) the district court erred in not granting a downward departure from the Sentencing Guidelines based on the government’s alleged “sentencing factor manipulation”;

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,378