Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “RICHARD HUERTA-CRUZ”
MacHado Ortiz, Richard v. Ex-Partepublic domain
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL III-ESPECIAL Apelación procedente del RICHARD MACHADO Tribunal de ORTIZ Primera Instancia, Sala de Relaciones
United States v. Perezpublic domain
328 F.3d 96 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Julio C. PEREZ, Jamie Ortiz, Jose Lopez, Jose Alejandro, Jose Richards, Luis Antonio Huertas, Elvin Burgos, Johnny Hernandez, Juan Sosa, Fernando Sanchez, Antonio Lopez, Pedro Cruz, Carmen Quinones, Damien Hurlburt, Patrick Rosenweig, Mario Larrondo, Angel Garcia, a.k.a. "Erick," Defendants,Luis Diaz, a.k.a. "Wiche," a.k.a. "Cheche," Defendant-Appellant. Docket N
United States v. Perezpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. Defendant-Appellant Mario Larrondo, convicted of possession with intent to distribute of 50 grams or more of a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B), appeals from the district court’s (Siragusa, J.) sentencing decision. I
United States v. Perezpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held a
United States v. Perezpublic domain
PER CURIAM. This sentencing appeal presents two questions that remain undecided in the Second Circuit, but which are subject to no current dispute among the other circuits. (1) Is U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(a) (which mandates that certain sentences run consecutively) in conflict with, and hence trumped by, 18 U.S.C. § 3584 (which directs the sentencing court to weigh various factors in deciding whether to impose a concurrent or consecut
Acevedo-Garcia v. Vera-Monroigpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 02-1139, 02-1340, 02-1465 LUIS A. ACEVEDO-GARCIA, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. ROBERTO VERA MONROIG, Individually and as Mayor of Adjuntas; MUNICIPALITY OF ADJUNTAS; IRMA M. GONZALEZ DELGADO, Individually and as Personnel Director of Adjuntas, Defendants, Appellants/Cross-Appellees.
Alvarez-Reynaga v. Holderpublic domain
596 F.3d 534 (2010) Armando ALVAREZ-REYNAGA, a.k.a. Armando Alvarez, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 08-70253. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 17, 2009.[*] Filed February 19, 2010. *535 Bernadette W. Connolly, San Jose, CA, for the peti
Alvarez-Reynaga v. Holderpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ARMANDO ALVAREZ-REYNAGA, a.k.a. Armando Alvarez, No. 08-70253 Petitioner, v. Agency No. A036-733-439 ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney OPINION General,
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1739 JANET VAZQUEZ-VELAZQUEZ; RAMON A. DEL VALLE-LOPEZ; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP DEL VALLE-VAZQUEZ; CARLOS R. CESPEDES-GOMEZ; JOCELYN CALO-BIRRIEL; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP CESPEDES-CALO; SAUL O. ALMEDA-CRUZ; JUDITH NIEVES-RIVERA; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP ALMEDA- NIEVES; FRANCISCO M. ALVARADO-BARRIOS; MARILYN ALVAREZ-RIVERA; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP ALVARADO-ALVAREZ; JUAN C. ARROYO-RAMIREZ; DAMARIS VELEZ-RIOS;
Rosselló-González v. Calderón-Serrapublic domain
HOWARD, Circuit Judge (in additional concurrence). I have joined in the cpurt’s disposition of these cases. I am less sure about our resolution of certain, discrete issues raised by the Rosselló appeal, and I identify those concerns here. 1. The district court did not categorize the order preventing the Commission from adjudicating the ballots. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(d);
Ouellette v. Millspublic domain
*39ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS NANCY TORRESEN, District Judge. In this case, the Plaintiffs challenge the validity of certain 2013 amendments to the Maine Pharmacy Act (the “MPA”), 32 M.R.S. §§ 13701-13810. Before the Court is a motion brought by Defendants Janet Mills and H. Sawin Millett, Jr. (together, the “State”) to dismiss the complaint (ECF No. 17)
United States v. Juan Rivera-Constantinopublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-10314 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:13-cr-01510- CKJ-BGM-1 JUAN MANUEL RIVERA- CONSTANTINO, AKA Juan Rivera- Constantino, OPINION De
Golden v. Statepublic domain
OPINION C. JOHNSON, Judge. ¶ 1 Appellant, Ryan Golden, was convicted by a jury in Pottawatomie County District Court, Case No. CF 2003-199, of First Degree Murder, in violation of 21 O.S.2001, § 701.1(A). Jury trial was held on March 9th — 11th, 2001, before the Honorable John Gardner, Associate District Judge. The jury set punishment at life imprisonment without the possibility of parole and J
United States v. Wooldridgepublic domain
SELYA, Circuit Judge. In cases in which defendants are accused of trafficking in narcotics, drug quantity is often both an-element of the offense and a critical integer in the sentencing calculus. These appeals illustrate that duality and, at the same time, serve to explicate the shifting standards of proof *95
In re Lopezpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA In re RICO RICARDO LOPEZ on Habeas Corpus. S258912 First Appellate District, Division One A152748 Sonoma County Superior Court SCR32760 April 3, 2023 Chief Justice Guerrero authored the opinion of the Court, in which Justices Corrigan, Liu, Kruger, Groban, Jenkins, an
In Re Tyco International, Ltd.public domain
322 F.Supp.2d 116 (2004) In re TYCO INTERNATIONAL, LTD. Multidistrict Litigation (MDL 1335) Nos. MDL 02-1335-PB, 03-1336-PB, 03-1338-PB, 03-1344-PB, 03-1345-PB, 03-1346-PB, 03-1347-PB, 03-1349-PB. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. June 21, 2004. William Chapman, Orr & Reno, Concord, NH, for Securities Action. Kenneth Bouchard, Bouchard & Kleinma
United States v. Ramirezpublic domain
652 F.3d 751 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio Sandoval RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco Ocampo-Pineda, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis A. Mandujano-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 09-3932, 10-2190, 10-2689. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh C
Ashraf Mahmoud v. De Moss Owners Assn, Inc.public domain
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the 2013 foreclosure sale of appellants Ashraf Mahmoud and Valerie Jackson’s condominium unit in Houston, Texas. In 2013, Mahmoud and Jackson filed suit against the condo owners association, the company that manages the day-to-day affairs of the complex, the law firm hired to collect on delinquent homeowner accounts, and the attorney responsible for their account. Appell
United States v. Ramirezpublic domain
675 F.3d 634 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio Sandoval RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco Ocampo-Pineda, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis A. Mandujano-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 09-3932, 10-2190, 10-2689. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh C
United States v. Flechspublic domain
Appellate Case: 22-5088 Document: 010111034849 Date Filed: 04/19/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 19, 2024