⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “RENEW Northeast v. United States Department of the Interior”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) SUSAN FREDERICKS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 20-cv-2458 (KBJ) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF )
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-05-27 · Published · cited 7× · 138 F.4th 1189
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TOHONO O’ODHAM NATION; No. 24-3659 SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE; D.C. No. ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST; 4:24-cv-00034- CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL JGZ DIVERSITY, Plaintiffs - Appellants, OPINION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTER
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-03-09 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SAVE LONG BEACH ISLAND et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 22-cv-55 (DLF) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Save Long Beach Island and its president, Robert Stern, bring this ch
District Court, D. Wyoming · 2015-09-30 · Published · cited 1× · 136 F. Supp. 3d 1317; 2015 WL 5845145
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Scott W. Skavdahl, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on the motions for preliminary injunction filed by the various Petitioners and Intervenor-Petitioners: Motion for Preliminary Injunction of Petitioners Independent Petroleum Association of America (“IPAÁ”) and Western Energy Alliance (“Alliance”) (hereinafte
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-09-25 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) OTAY MESA PROPERTY, L.P., et al., ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) v. ) No. 13-cv-0240 (KBJ) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) THE INTERIOR, et al., )
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-11-06 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) POWDER RIVER BASIN ) RESOURCE COUNCIL, et. al., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 22-cv-2696 (TSC) ) U.
District Court, D. Nevada · 2017-03-31 · Published · cited 2× · 250 F. Supp. 3d 718; 47 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20055; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49422
ORDER (Pife’ Motion for Summary Judgment— ECF No. 67; Plfs’ Motion to Supplement Record—ECF No. 68; Defs’ Motion for Summary Judgment— ECF No. 75; Intervenors’ Motion for Summary Judgment—ECF No. 77; Defs’ Motion to Strike—ECF No. 102) MIRANDA M. DU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. SUMMARY Plaintiffs bring this action against the Department of the Interior (“DOI”), Bure
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024-12-05 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit _____________________ No. 23-1853 No. 23-2051 SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC.; LONG ISLAND COMMERCIAL FISHING ASSOC., INC.; XIII NORTHEAST FISHERY SECTOR, INC.; HERITAGE FISHERIES, INC.; NAT. W., INC.; OLD SQUAW FISHERIES, INC., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; HONORABLE DEBRA HAALAND, in h
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-08-06 · Published · cited 4× · 36 F. Supp. 3d 384; 2014 WL 3871159; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108396
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge. This suit brought under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (“FOIA”), concerns a request by the Natural Resources Defense Council (“NRDC”) for *389records of coal-mining leases previously awarded by the U.S. Department of Interi- or (“DOI”) and Bureau of Land Management (
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-06-18 · Published · cited 76× · 608 F.3d 592; 40 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20165; 70 ERC (BNA) 1961; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16420; 2010 WL 2431001
608 F.3d 592 (2010) TE-MOAK TRIBE OF WESTERN SHOSHONE OF NEVADA; Western Shoshone Defense Project; Great Basin Mine Watch, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; Robert V. Abbey State Director; Gail G. Givens, Assistant Field Manager Battle Mountain *593 Field Office; Clinton R. Oke, Assistant Field Manager; United States Bureau of Land Management, Defendants-Appellees, Cortez
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-01-29 · Published · cited 30× · 919 F. Supp. 2d 51; 2013 WL 324035; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11592
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge. The plaintiffs bring this consolidated action, under the Indian Reorganization Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 461, et seq., the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551, et seq., the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701, et seq., and
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-09-23 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ASKAN HOLDINGS, LTD., Plaintiff V. Civil Case No. 20-1458 (RJL) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, et al. New Neue Nee Nee Ne Nee” ne” ee ee” ee” Defendants. Vd MEMORANDUM OPINION September Zag 2021 [Dkt. # 36] Plaintiff Askan Holdings, Ltd. (“Askan”) is challenging a decision by the United States Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control and several officials (colle
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-01-29 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL COUNCIL OF : AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYERS, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 22-3569 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.:
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-10-25 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAHLON KIRWA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 17-1793(ESH) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs are three non-citizens serving in the United States Army’s Selected Res
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-03-06 · Published · cited 78× · 239 F. Supp. 3d 100; 2017 WL 908179; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31260
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge This is the fourth in a series of opinions addressing the extent to which the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) requires the Federal Bureau of Investigations (“FBI”) to disclose records relating to the FBI’s review and response to prior FOIA requests. Plaintif
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-09-25 · Published · cited 4× · 344 F. Supp. 3d 355
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Otay Mesa Property, L.P., Rancho Vista Del Mar, and Otay International, LLC (collectively "Otay Mesa" or "Plaintiffs") own land in San Diego County, California, that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ("the FWS") has designated as a "critical habit" for the endangered Riverside fairy shrimp under the Endangered Species Act ("the ESA"), 16 U.S.C §§ 1531 - 1544. Otay Mesa
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-09-23 · Published · cited 5× · 68 F. Supp. 3d 218; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133776; 2014 WL 4723778
MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Lonnie J. Parker brings this action against defendant the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys (“EOUSA”) under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552 et seq. (2012). Compl. ¶ 1 [Dkt. # 1]. Plai
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996-06-27 · Published · cited 20× · 88 F.3d 981; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15430; 1996 WL 363418
EDWARD S. SMITH, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring and dissenting. I concur with the majority’s conclusion that the agency’s decision not to renew Mr. Schafer’s contract is not a “removal” under 5 U.S.C. § 7512. However, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s disposition of this case as a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. I conclude we have appellate jurisdiction to rev
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-12-19 · Published · cited 1× · 76 F. Supp. 3d 69
*74 MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND... 76 A. Statutory Framework: The Endangered Species Act Of 1973... 76 1. The 1973 Act.. .77
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-03-26 · Published · cited 15× · 97 F.4th 268
Case: 24-50149 Document: 163 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/26/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-50149 ____________ FILED