Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “REEDER v. 3M COMPANY”
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Larry Drake and Rosalie Drake, a married couple, each filed employment discrimination claims under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and race discrimination claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 against their former employer, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company (“3M”). The Drakes, both of whom are white, alleged that they were subjected to a hostile work environ
Faris v. AC AND S, INC.public domain
842 N.E.2d 870 (2006) Patricia FARIS, Individually and Personal Representative of the Estate of John Faris, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. AC AND S, INC., et al., Appellees-Defendants. No. 49A02-0506-CV-494. Court of Appeals of Indiana. February 21, 2006. Rehearing Denied May 1, 2006. *871 Linda George, W. Russell Sipes
Deleese Allen v. Walmart Stores, L.L.C.public domain
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: On Wednesday, April 13, 2016, Karalee Alaine Williams ("Williams") was found dead in her car in the parking lot of Wal-Mart Store #2439. Her death resulted from inhaling a large quantity of aerosol dust remover. Williams's mother, Plaintiff-Appellant Deleese Allen ("Allen"), brought negligence claims in her individual capacity, against Defendants-Appellees
Jumonville v. Kingpublic domain
I .WILLIAMS, Judge. The plaintiff, Jan Jumonville, appeals a judgment in favor of the defendant, W.B. Pete King (“King”). The district court granted King’s peremptory exception of prescription, dismissing Jumonville’s legal malpractice claim. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS In 1984, Jan Jumonville underwent breast implant surgery. In 1987, the right-side implant ruptured and
McCorkle v. AC & S, Inc.public domain
OPINION BAKER, Judge. Appellant-plaintiff Dianne McCorkle (McCorkle), individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Phillip McCorkle, appeals from the trial court's grant of the motion to dismiss and final Judgment in favor of appellees-defendants AC and S, Inc., et al. (Appellees), in her action regarding personal injuries to Phillip caused by asbestos. For more background, see our companion de
Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealthpublic domain
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION ORDER In a separate order filed concurrently with this order, we certified a question on Oregon price discrimination law to the Oregon Supreme Court. Accordingly, the opinion filed on September 4, 2007 is AMENDED as follows. First, the last paragraph before section “I,” originally, 502 F.3d at 901:
Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealthpublic domain
502 F.3d 895 (2007) CASCADE HEALTH SOLUTIONS fka McKenzie-Willamette Hospital, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEACEHEALTH, a Washington State nonprofit corporation, Defendant-Appellee, and PacificSource Health Plans, Defendant, *896 Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon; Providence Health Plan; McKenzie-Willamette Regional Medical Center Associates, LLC, Defendants-Interveno
GenoSource, LLC v. Inguran, LLCpublic domain
C.J. Williams, United States District Judge *1216TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 1216 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND... 1217 III. ANALYSIS... 1218 A. Arbitrability... 1218 B. Temporary Restraining Order Versus Preliminary Injunction... 1220 C. The Propriety of a
Cascade Health v. Peacehealthpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CASCADE HEALTH SOLUTIONS fka MCKENZIE-WILLAMETTE HOSPITAL, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEACEHEALTH, a Washington State nonprofit corporation, Defendant-Appellee, No. 05-35627 and D.C. No. PACIFICSOURCE HEALTH PLANS, CV-02-06032-ALH
OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: This case reads like an antitrust primer for aftermarket issues, with claims for exclusive dealing, tying, essential facilities, refusal to deal, price bundling, and price squeezing under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and, differential pricing/price discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act. „ Honeywell Internatio
Nirvana, Inc. v. Nestle Waters North America Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER MAE A. D’AGOSTINO, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On August 20, 2014, Plaintiff commenced this suit in New York State Supreme Court of Oneida County. See Dkt. No. 1-1. In the complaint, Plaintiff asserted violations of federal and state antitrust laws as well as claims for breach of contract, tortious interference, unfair competition, and trade d
England v. Advance Stores Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS B. RUSSELL, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff in this wage and hour lawsuit seeks compensation for his off-the-cloek work and for the denial of his meal and rest breaks pursuant to the Kentucky Wages and Hours Act, KRS Chapter 337. The named Plaintiff in the suit is Eric England, a former employee of the Defendant, Advance Stores Company, Inc., d/
BlueEarth Biofuels, LLC v. Hawaiian Electric Co.public domain
780 F.Supp.2d 1061 (2011) BLUEEARTH BIOFUELS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC COMPANY, Inc.; Maui Electric Company, Ltd.; Aloha Petroleum, Ltd.; and Karl E. Stahlkopf, Individually, Defendants. Civ. No. 09-00181 DAE-KSC. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. February 8, 2011. *1064 Jaime Olin, Michael K. Hurst, Tonya Par
Ricks v. BMEzine. Com, LLCpublic domain
727 F.Supp.2d 936 (2010) Gregory RICKS, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, v. BMEZINE.COM, LLC, Defendant/Counterclaimant. BMEzine.com, LLC, Third Party Plaintiff, v. Gee Whiz Domains Privacy Service, Third Party Defendant. No. 2:08-CV-01174-PMP-GWF. United States District Court, D. Nevada. July 26, 2010. *942 Mark R. Borghe
Broadcom Corp v. Qualcomm Incpublic domain
Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-4-2007 Broadcom Corp v. Qualcomm Inc Precedential or N
Funai v. Brownleepublic domain
369 F.Supp.2d 1222 (2004) Joyce R. FUNAI, Plaintiff, v. R.L. BROWNLEE, in his capacity as the Acting Secretary of the Army, Defendant. No. CIV.03-00160 ACK/BMK. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. November 23, 2004. *1223 *1224 Clayton C. Ikei, Jerry P.S. Chang, Honolulu, HI, for Joyce R
Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.public domain
501 F.3d 297 (2007) BROADCOM CORPORATION, Appellant v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED. No. 06-4292. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued: June 28, 2007. Filed: September 4, 2007. *298 *299 *300 *301
Moraine v. Social Security Administrationpublic domain
695 F.Supp.2d 925 (2010) Beverly Arlene MORAINE, Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil No. 08-5982 (JRT/RLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. March 8, 2010. *927 Beverly Arlene Moraine, St. Paul, MN, pro se. Lonnie Bryan, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Att
Coca-Cola Co. v. Harmar Bottling Co.public domain
218 S.W.3d 671 (2006) The COCA-COLA COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. HARMAR BOTTLING COMPANY et al., Respondents. No. 03-0737. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued November 9, 2004. Decided October 20, 2006. Rehearing Denied May 4, 2007. *674 Robert Harrison Pemberton, Austin, Orrin L. Harrison III, Dav
Grutter v. Bollingerpublic domain
539 U.S. 306 (2003) GRUTTER v. BOLLINGER et al. No. 02-241. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 1, 2003. Decided June 23, 2003. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT *307 *308 *309