⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “REBECCA ANDREA LYONS”

Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2021-04-14 · Published · cited 13× · 957 N.W.2d 261; 396 Wis. 2d 434; 2021 WI 33
2021 WI 33 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP1742 COMPLETE TITLE: Tavern League of Wisconsin, Inc., Sawyer County Tavern League, Inc. and Flambeau Forest Inn LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Andrea Palm and Wisconsin Department of Health Services,
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010-12-21 · Published · cited 4× · 759 F. Supp. 2d 975; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134912; 2010 WL 5495015
759 F.Supp.2d 975 (2010) George H. RYAN, Sr. Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 10 C 5512. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 21, 2010. *977 Dan K. Webb, Greg J. Miarecki, James R. Thompson, Matthew Robert Carter, Winston & Strawn LLP, Albert W. Alschuler, Attorney at L
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 566 S.W.3d 410
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
State v. Dyepublic domain
Washington Supreme Court · 2013-09-26 · Published · cited 173× · 178 Wash. 2d 541; 309 P.3d 1192
Wiggins, J. ¶1 This case requires us to determine whether a court may allow a witness to be accompanied by a comfort animal, here a dog, when testifying during trial. Generally, we give trial courts wide discretion to control trial proceedings, including the manner in which testimony will be presented. We recognize that some trial procedures, such as providing a child witness with a toy on the stand or shackling a defendant at t
United States Court of International Trade · 2006-12-22 · Published · cited 10× · 475 F. Supp. 2d 1370; 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 1995; 30 C.I.T. 1995; 29 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1129; 2006 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 194
475 F.Supp.2d 1370 (2006) ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORP. and AK Steel Corp., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Outokumpu Stainless, Ltd., et al., Defendant-Intervenors. Slip Op. 06-188, Court No. 05-00488. United States Court of International Trade. December 22, 2006. *1371 *1372 Kelley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-11-04 · Published · cited 4× · 188 A.D.3d 714; 131 N.Y.S.3d 896; 2020 NY Slip Op 06280
People ex rel. Tse v Barometre (2020 NY Slip Op 06280) People ex rel. Tse v Barometre 2020 NY Slip Op 06280 Decided on November 4, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026-07-07 · Published · cited 0×
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2024-3316 _____________________________ WILLIAM J. JERNIGAN, Appellant, v. RAYMOND G. REINKE and MARY LINN JERNIGAN, et al., Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Jan Shackelford, Judge. July 7, 2026 PER CURIAM.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2022-06-08 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT SOUTHPOINTE GOLF CLUB, INC., : No. 217 WAL 2021 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court :
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008-06-10 · Published · cited 0× · 281 F. App'x 980
Judgment PER CURIAM. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
District Court, C.D. California · 2008-01-10 · Published · cited 1× · 535 F. Supp. 2d 1020; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32809; 2008 WL 445839
535 F.Supp.2d 1020 (2008) MEDIMMUNE, INC., Plaintiff, v. GENENTECH, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CV03-2567 MRP (CTx). United States District Court, C.D. California. January 10, 2008. *1021 Aaron P. Maurer, David C. Kiernan, Jessamyn S. Berniker, Paul B. Gaffney, Philip A. Sechler, Rebecca S. Legrand, Richard S. Scott, Williams a
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2018-12-30 · Published · cited 1× · 352 F. Supp. 3d 665
Reed O'Connor, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *668On December 14, 2018, the Court entered its Order granting partial summary judgment on Count I of the Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. See ECF No. 211. On December 16, 2018, the Court ordered the Parties to meet and confer and, by January 4, 2019, to jointly propose a schedule for resolvi
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2018-12-14 · Published · cited 0× · 340 F. Supp. 3d 579
Reed O'Connor, United States District Judge *585The United States healthcare system touches millions of lives in a daily and deeply personal way. Health-insurance policy is therefore a politically charged affair-inflaming emotions and testing civility. But Article III courts, the Supreme Court has confirmed, are not tasked with, nor are they suited to, policymaking.
District Court, C.D. California · 2008-02-07 · Published · cited 4× · 535 F. Supp. 2d 1000; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12198; 2008 WL 370620
535 F.Supp.2d 1000 (2008) MEDIMMUNE, INC., Plaintiff, v. GENENTECH, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CV 03-2567 MRP (CTx). United States District Court, C.D. California. February 7, 2008. *1001 *1002 Aaron P. Maurer, David C. Kiernan, Gerson A. Zweifach, Jessamyn S. Berniker, Paul B. Gaffney, Phi
State v. Kleypaspublic domain
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001-12-28 · Published · cited 144× · 40 P.3d 139; 272 Kan. 894; 2001 Kan. LEXIS 953
272 Kan. 894 (2001) 40 P.3d 139 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. GARY W. KLEYPAS, Appellant. No. 80,920. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed December 28, 2001. *908 Jessica R. Kunen, chief appellate defender, and Steven R. Zinn, deputy appellate defender, argued the cause, and Rebecca E. W
Ohio Supreme Court · 2018-01-24 · Published · cited 0× · 89 N.E.3d 622; 2018 Ohio 248; 151 Ohio St. 3d 1488
This list is being published pursuant to Gov.Bar R. 1(15). The following persons have applied to take the February 2017 Ohio Bar Examination. Allen Taylor Gene Vance Lima Ashland Sarah Kathleen Lewis Austinburg Belmont Carson Lee Schambach St. Clairsville Butler Eric ScottBeutel Liberty Township Marc Edward Bras
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2023-11-15 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr
Thompson v. Spitzerpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2023-04-11 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 4/11/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE WILLIAM THOMPSON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, G060988 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2021-01184633) TODD SPITZER et al., OPINION D
Thompson v. Spitzerpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2023-05-05 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/5/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE WILLIAM THOMPSON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, G060988 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2021-01184633) TODD SPITZER et al.,
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022-02-25 · Published · cited 0×
Prince George’s County Department of Social Services v. Akeem Taharaka, No. 786, September Term 2020, filed February 25, 2022. Opinion by Friedman, J. HEADNOTE: INFANTS — CHILD PROTECTION — AGENCIES AND PROCEEDINGS — ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AND REVIEW THEREOF In evaluating the factors under CP § 11-304(e)(2) to determine whether a child’s statements are sufficiently reliable to be considered credible evidence of child sexual abuse, an ALJ may not use archaic stereotypes but should instead app