Cases

188 Wis.2d 25 (1994) 523 N.W.2d 578 Phillip W. OLSON, and Randal F. Konichek, Plaintiffs-Appellants,[†] v. 3M COMPANY, Maynard Schultz, City of Prairie Du Chien, Prairie Du Chien Police Department, Gary R. Knickerbocker, Terry J. Zinkle, and Hartford Insurance Group (ITT Hartford), Defendants-Respondents. No. 93-2418. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1587 KOLON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00622-REP)

392 F.3d 758 Anthony ROGERS; et al., Plaintiffs,Anthony Rogers; Richard Morales; Ventura Calderon, Jr.; Andrew L. Almazan; Robert J. De Leon; Rolando Cesar Garza; Robert A. Gearhart; Isidro Medina, Jr.; Timothy L. Menchaca; Emilio M. Montes; Bruce R. Moore; Nathaniel Oakman; Antonio Rivas; Jeffery J. Zavala; and George W. Randall, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 03-50588.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RADER. Dissenting opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge ARCHER. RADER, Circuit Judge. The Gillette Company (Gillette) owns U.S. Patent No. 6,212,777 (issued April 10, 2001) (the ’777 patent) for wet-shave safety razors with multiple blades. Gillette sued Energizer Holdings, Inc. (Energizer) in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusett

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-1220 THE GILLETTE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. John E. Nathan, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, of New York,

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. The defendants designated a corporation to serve as their expert witness. The plaintiffs objected, arguing that an expert witness must be a biological person. According to the plaintiffs, the distinction matters because a corporate expert witness could claim to rely on the

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00518-CV Rosemarie Satterfield, as Representative of the Estate of Jerrold Braley, Deceased, Appellant v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., Individually and as Successor to Mundet Cork Corporation, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNT

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00518-CV Rosemarie Satterfield, as Representative of the Estate of Jerrold Braley, Deceased, Ap

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 211 ON REHEARING On original submission the appeal in this case was dismissed, and the author of that opinion was Supernumerary Judge T. Werth Thagard. After rehearing was applied for but before a decision could be made, Judge Thagard died. The case was reassigned to the author of the opinion o

707 F.Supp. 793 (1989) MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO., Plaintiff, v. DACAR CHEMICAL PRODUCTS CO., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 88-374. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. March 4, 1989. David Hanson, Pittsburgh, Pa., John D. Gould, Randall A. Hillson, Minneapolis, *794 Minn., for plaintiff 3M. Lawrence G.

521 F.Supp.2d 879 (2007) Randal E. McCULLOUGH, Plaintiff, v. AEGON USA, INC., Aegon Usa, Inc. Board of Directors, Patrick S. Baird, James A. Beardsworth, Kirk W. Buese, Tom A. Schlossberg, Arthur C. Schneider, Mary Taiber, James R. Trefz, Transamerica Life Insurance Company, Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company, Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, Transamerica Investment Management LLC, Diversified Investment Advisors, Inc. a

[Cite as Carter v. Univ. Park Dev. Corp., 2022-Ohio-3462.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) ROGER W. CARTER C.A. Nos. 30035 30180 Appellant v.

564 N.W.2d 575 (1997) Donald E. DIEZ, Appellant, v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING, Respondent. No. C5-97-83. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. June 17, 1997. Review Denied August 21, 1997. *577 Richard T. Wylie, Dee Rowe, Minneapolis, for Appellant. Thomas P. Kane, Kathleen M. Mahoney, David M. Wilk, O

DECISION This an asbestos-related product liability case brought against a number of corporate defendants. In the instant matter, Defendant Caterpillar Inc. ("Caterpillar") moves for summary judgment pursuant to Super. R. Civ. P. 56. Angela Clayton, as surviving spouse of Randall Clayton ("Mr. Clayton") as well as in her capacity as executrix of his estate, and her children (collectively "Plaintiffs") object to the motio

144 F.Supp.2d 958 (2000) Mary Grace McCONKEY and husband, Don McConkey, Plaintiffs, v. McGHAN MEDICAL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. 3:98-CV-003. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Knoxville Division. July 6, 2000. *959 *960 Lisa June Cox, Jackson, Tenn.; Michael R. Hugo, Samu

630 F.Supp.2d 1044 (2008) IMATION CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V., a foreign corporation; U.S. Philips Corporation, a New York corporation; and Philips Electronics North America Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Defendants; Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., a foreign corporation; U.S. Philips Corporation, a New York corporation; and Philips Electronics North America Corporation, a

642 N.W.2d 80 (2002) CARGILL, INCORPORATED, Appellant, v. EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. No. C1-01-1589. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. April 16, 2002. *82 Thomas C. Mielenhausen, Christopher L. Lynch, Lindquist & Vennum, P.L.L.P., St. Paul, for appellant. Richard P. Mahoney, Victor E. Lund, Mahoney, Dougherty

[Cite as Bunta v. Mast, 2020-Ohio-5500.] COURT OF APPEALS HOLMES COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT VASILE BUNTA : JUDGES: : : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J.

586 F.3d 980 (2009) IMATION CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V., U.S. Philips Corporation, and Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Moser Baer India Limited, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, and Global Data Media FZ-LLC, MBI International FZ-LLC, MBI International Services Private Limited, MBI India Marketing Private Limited, Glyphics Media, Inc.

525 N.W.2d 568 (1994) Juanita FAHEY, Respondent, v. AVNET, INC., Relator. No. CX-94-856. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. December 20, 1994. Review Denied February 14, 1995. *570 Eric R. Miller, Lisa M. Bankey, Oppenheimer, Wolff & Donnelly, St. Paul, for relator. George L. May, Hastings, for respondent.