Cases

468 F.Supp.2d 51 (2006) Benjamin RAMEY Plaintiff, v. POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 04-2088(RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 31, 2006. *52 *53 Maria Carlotta Mendoza, Khadijah R. Ali, Law Offices of Khadijah R. Ali, Washington, DC,

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge. Plaintiff Benjamin Ramey filed two pro se complaints against his former employer, the Potomac Electric Power Company (“PEPCO”). Because the claims are barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion, sometimes known as res judicata, they will be dismissed pursuant to the Court’s authority sua sponte to screen pro se complaints, 2

580 F.Supp.2d 40 (2008) Benjamin RAMEY, Plaintiff, v. POTOMAC ELEC. POWER CO., Defendant. Benjamin Ramey, Plaintiff, v. Potomac Elec. Power Co., Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-2132(RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 25, 2008. *41 Benjamin Ramey, Washington, DC, pro se. Connie No

950 A.2d 33 (2008) Benjamin RAMEY, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, Respondent. Potomac Electric Power Company, Intervenor. No. 06-AA-743. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted June 1, 2007. Decided June 5, 2008. Benjamin Ramey, pro se. Kevin J. O'Connell was on the brief for intervenor.

997 A.2d 694 (2010) Benjamin RAMEY, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, Respondent, PEPCO, Intervenor. No. 08-AA-1369. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted December 2, 2009. Decided July 1, 2010. *695 Benjamin Ramey, pro se. Robert J. Spagnoletti, Attorney

PER CURIAM: This ease is before this Court upon appeal of a final order of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia (hereinafter “Commission”)1 entered on November 22, 2011, ruling upon a Joint Petition for Declaratory Order filed by the respondents herein, Monongahela Power Company and the Potomac Edison Company, both doing business as Allegheny Power (hereinafter referred to separately as

FISHER, Associate Judge: The District of Columbia Department of Employment Services denied workers’ compensation benefits to Jamil Muhammad, holding that his psychological injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. Because the Compensation Review Board’s decision and the underlying compensation order were based on an error of law, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. I. Fac

KETCHUM, Justice: This deliberate intent action is before this Court upon the appeal of the plaintiff / petitioner David McComas (“McComas”) from the order of the Circuit Court of Cabell County granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant / respondent ACF Industries, LLC (“ACF”). McComas, a welder employed by ACF, sustained severe burns from an are blast emanating from a 480-volt electrical box. The blast occurred as McCo

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September Term 2013 FILED _______________ October 17, 2013 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 12-0548 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK

730 F.Supp.2d 25 (2010) James K. BRYANT, Plaintiff, v. PEPCO, Defendant. Civil Action No. 09-cv-1063 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 9, 2010. *26 Nathaniel D. Johnson, Laplata, MD, for Plaintiff. Susanne Harris Carnell, Lorenger & Carnell PLC, Alexandria, VA, for Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES K. BRYANT, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action No. 09-cv-1063 (GK) : : PEPCO, : Defendant : MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff James K. Bryant, an Af

MEMORANDUM OPINION (March 19, 2014) COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiff Keith Battle filed suit against Defendant Truland Systems Corporation (“Truland”) claiming a hostile work environment, retaliation, and disparate treatment in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Plaintiffs claims arise out of a series of rac

778 F.Supp.2d 85 (2011) Rodney CARSON, Plaintiff, v. William SIM et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 04-1641 (RWR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 22, 2011. *89 E. Scott Frison, Jr., The Law Firm of E. Scott Frison, Jr., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Connie Nora Bertram, Cooley, LLP, Washington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) RODNEY CARSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 04-1641 (RWR) ) WILLIAM SIM et al., ) ) Defendants. )

677 F.Supp.2d 206 (2010) Kevin R. KELLY, Plaintiff, v. Karen G. MILLS, Administrator, United States Small Business Administration, Defendant.[1] Civil Action No. 05-900 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 6, 2010. *210 Alan Lescht, Susan Laiken Kruger, Alan Lescht & Associates, P.C.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) KEVIN R. KELLY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-900 (PLF)

MEMORANDUM OPINION EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge. Plaintiff Phuc Nguyen (“Nguyen”), proceeding pro se, brings this action against the Secretary of the Navy, alleging discrimination on the basis of race, national origin, and retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiff Mohammad Javad Hajjar-Ne-jad brings this action pro se against the George Washington University, principally challenging his dismissal as a medical student from GWs School of Medicine and Health Sciences in July 2007. Presently before the Court is Defendant

RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge, dissenting. As the majority correctly states, this case presents the sole issue of whether a child of a miner, whose widow was receiving benefits under Part B of the Black Lung Benefits Act (Act), 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-960, need independently establish the miner’s total disability due to pneumoconiosis under the criteria in Part C of the Act to establish entitlement under 20 C.F.R.

298 S.W.2d 492 (1957) Everett HOGUE, Claimant, Respondent, v. Hugo WURDACK, Alleged Employer, and Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd., Insurer, Appellants. No. 7569. Springfield Court of Appeals, Missouri. January 28, 1957. *493 *494 Sherwood R. Volkman, St. Louis, for appellants.