Cases

JUSTICE COLEMAN delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff, Wasim Qureshi, appeals from an order of the circuit court of Cook County granting summary judgment to defendants, Junaid and Loretta Ahmed, in this negligence action for injuries his 10-year-old daughter Mehak sustained in a slip and fall on defendants’ treadmill at their home. On appeal, plaintiff claims that the

916 N.E.2d 1153 (2009) 334 Ill.Dec. 265 Wasim QURESHI, as Father and Next Friend of Mehak Qureshi, a Minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Junaid AHMED and Loretta Ahmed, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1-08-0795. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division. September 30, 2009. *1154 Clancy Law Office,

NUMBER 13-18-00053-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG RODOLFO ALVAREZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 377th District Court

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

Opinion by Judge GRAHAM. 1 1 Defendant, Antonio Aguilar, appearing pro se, appeals the district court's order denying his Crim. P. 85(c) motion for postcon-viction relief alleging ineffective assistance of *1257counsel. We affirm. As a matter of first impression, we conclude that the implied acquittal rule does not bar retrial of a greater offense

OPINION Evelyn V. Keyes, Justice A jury convicted appellant, Elmer Nunez-Marquez, of the first-degree felony offense of aggravated robbery and assessed his punishment at fifty-five years’ confinement. 1 In two issues, appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motions to suppress

Paul W. Grimm, United States District Judge Pedro Jose Ordoñez is facing trial for illegal reentry into the United States after prior removal,1 in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2). Indictment, ECF No. 1. If convicted, he faces imprisonment of up to twenty years. He has f

1 P.3d 192 (1999) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harry A. MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 98CA0879. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II. May 27, 1999. Certiorari Denied May 22, 2000. Ken Salazar, Attorney General, Barbara McDonnell, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Michael E. McLachlan, Solicitor General, A. William Bonn

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

MEMORANDUM & ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: I. Introduction..............................................................254 II. Facts....................................................................254 A. Parties..............................................................254 B. New York State No-Fault Law.........................

ORDER TEILBORG, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motorola, Inc. and Royal Indemnity Company’s Motion for Reconsideration Re: October 3, 2002 Discovery Order (Doc. # 84). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the Motion. Background At an October 3, 2002 hearing regarding, discovery disputes, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to produc

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker,* Judge Malveaux and Senior Judge Haley Argued at Fredericksburg, Virginia PUBLISHED BRAULIO MARCELO CASTILLO, S/K/A BRAULIO MARCELLO CASTILLO OPINION BY v. Record No. 0140-17-4 JUDGE MARY BENNETT MALVEAUX