Cases

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge I. Introduction Plaintiff Robert J. Quinn, Jr. (“Plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) and seeks review of the final decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), denying Plaintiffs application for disability benefits. (Dkt. 1). Plai

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Diane Logan appeals the magistrate judge’s order* granting summary judgment for the Commissioner of Social Security in her action seeking review of the Commissioner’s denial of social security benefits. On appeal, we confine our review to

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KAREN E. SCHREIER, District Judge. Pending are motions for summary judgment by all defendants. Plaintiff, Daniel Reed Christensen, opposes each motion, and separately moves for summary judgment against defendants Humane Society of the United States, Wayne Pacelle, Scottlund Haisley, Dr. Dawn Dale, Dr. Adam Bauknecht, United Animal Nations, Ti

*1171ante, p. 835; ante, p. 845; ante, p. 848; ante, p. 849; ante, p. 850; ante, p. 850; ante, p. 851; ante, p. 851; ante, p. 852; ante, p. 853;

The Medical Board ruled out stress as the cause of petitioner’s cardiomyopathy, and concluded that there was no known association between exposure to toxins at the World Trade Center disaster recovery and clean up sites and the development of viral myocarditis. The Board of Trustees were entitled to rely on this finding to overcome the presumption of General Municipal Law § 207-k (see Matter of Lo Pinto v Ward, 124 AD2d 497 [1986]; Matter of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Gayle Palombo v. Civil No. 17-cv-284-LM Opinion No. 2018 DNH 132 Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security O R D E R Gayle Palombo seeks judicial review, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) & 1383(c)(3), of the decision of the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security A

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Jerry Comstock appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of his application for Social Security disability benefits. We affirm. I. Jerry Comstock was forty-one years old when he first applied for Social Security disability bene

KELLER, J. The plaintiff, Matthew C., appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his administrative appeal following a decision by the defendant, the Commissioner of Children and Families, denying him a hearing to challenge the defendant's decision to substantiate allegations that he neglected his two minor children. The plaintiff avers that the trial court erred by (1) dec

USCA11 Case: 22-13992 Document: 156-1 Date Filed: 07/07/2026 Page: 1 of 85 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13992 ____________________ LEROY PERNELL, SHARON WRIGHT AUSTIN, SHELLEY PARK, JENNIFE

53 F.Supp.2d 347 (1999) James M. QUINN, Plaintiff, v. NASSAU COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; Donald Kane; Phillip Rice; Joseph H. Allen; Edward Gonzalez; Daniel Lishansky; and John Ryan, Defendants. No. 97CV3310(ADS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 28, 1999. *348 *349

ZARELLA, J., dissenting. The majority concludes that the marriage laws,1 which define marriage as the union of one man and one woman,2 classify on the basis of sexual orientation, that this classification is subject to intermediate scrutiny under article first, §§ 1 and 20, of the Connecticut constitution, as amended by articl

681 F.Supp. 1422 (1988) Robert J. QUINN, Jr. and Patricia J. Kampsen, Plaintiffs, v. The STATE OF MISSOURI, et al., Defendants. No. 87-4492-CV-C-5. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, C.D. March 15, 1988. *1423 *1424 Kevin M. O'Keefe, St. Louis, Mo., and Jess W. Ullom, Clayton, Mo., f

909 A.2d 89 (2006) 49 Conn.Sup. 644 Elizabeth KERRIGAN et al. v. STATE of Connecticut et al. No. CV-04 4001813. Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of New Haven. July 12, 2006. *90 Maureen M. Murphy, New Haven, for the plaintiffs. Jane R. Rosenberg, assistant attorney general, with whom

838 F.Supp. 70 (1993) Margaret J. QUINN, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant. No. 92-CV-452A. United States District Court, W.D. New York. October 1, 1993. *71 Randall Kay, Buffalo, NY, for plaintiff. Dennis C. Vacco, U.S. Atty., (Shirley Troutman, Asst. U.S. Atty., of counsel), Buffalo, NY, fo

CRIPPEN, Judge (concurring specially). Although concurring with the decision to terminate appellant’s parental rights, I firmly hold the opinion that termination decisions must be reversed in the absence of positive proof that a child’s welfare is endangered by critical, chronic parenting failures. The facts here are sufficient for termination, but singularly because of the father’s ada

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Represented by counsel, Plaintiff Scott London ("Plaintiff") brings this action pursuant to Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (the "Act"), seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner," or "Defendant") denying his applications for disability insurance benefits ("DIB")

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Represented by counsel, Plaintiff Sharon K. Pulos ("Plaintiff") brings this action pursuant to Title II of the Social Security Act (the "Act"), seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner," or "Defendant") denying her application for disability insurance benefits ("DIB"). (Dkt.

Hunt, J. ¶1 Dwayne D. Lenca appeals the Employment Security Department commissioner’s (Commissioner) denial of unemployment benefits when the Commissioner affirmed the administrative law judge’s (ALJ) denial without allowing additional evidence. Lenca argues that (1) the ALJ denied him a fair hearing in failing to continue the telephonic hearing sua sponte when pro se Lenca announced that he had a job interview scheduled for the

Quinn-Brintnall, J. ¶1 Steven P. Graves appeals from a judgment of the Thurston County Superior Court, affirming the Employment Security Department’s (ESD) denial of his claim for unemployment benefits. An administrative law judge (ALJ) entered a default judgment in favor of ESD after Graves failed to appear for a hearing on his appeal. Because Graves’s only reason for failing to attend the hearing was that he had

OPINION OF THE COURT HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. These cross-appeals require us to decide whether mentally ill residents of New Jersey who have been committed to state custody are entitled to judicial process before they may be forcibly medicated in nonemergency situations. At issue is Administrative Bulletin 5:04B, a procedure regulating the forcible admin