Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Bradley Nichols v. Case No. 16-cv-443-PB Opinion No. 2018 DNH 047 US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Bradley Nichols challenges the denial of his claims for Social Security disability income (“SSDI”) benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C

Quimby v . SSA 12-cv-428-PB 11/8/13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Tracey Quimby v. Civil N o . 12-cv-428-PB Opinion N o . 2013 DNH 150 Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Tracey Quimby seeks judicial review of a ruling by the Commissioner o

Doe, J., dissenting. In the special plea, to which the plaintiff demurs, the defendant does not deny that he took the plaintiff’s property — Eaton v. B. C. & M. R. R. Co., 51 N. H. 504, 511-516, Thompson v. Androscoggin R. I. Co., 54 N. H. 545; but he alleges that, acting as an agent of the United States, under and by virtue of certain acts of congress, he took it for the

Liacos, C.J. (dissenting). While I agree with most of the court’s analysis of the various issues in this appeal, I cannot agree that a child’s right to an education, based on Part II, c. 5, § 2, of the Massachusetts Constitution is not a fundamental right. Thus, I cannot agree that the standard of review to be applied to the defendants’ actions need only have a rational basis to be deemed constitutionally valid. I write separately

218 F.Supp.2d 1300 (2002) NATIONAL FEDERATION OF REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLIES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 00-0759-RV-C. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. August 27, 2002. *1301 *1302 *1303<

MASSA, Justice. James Whitcomb Riley (1849-1916), our celebrated “Hoosier Poet,” is widely credited with the origination of the Duck Test; as he expressed it, “[w]hen I see a bird that walks like a duck and swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, I call that bird a duck.” 1 Brandy Walczak successfully applied for em

ACCEPTED 03-14-00774-CV 6707027 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

56 Cal.App.4th 310 (1997) E.W.A.P., INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. B102861. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two. July 9, 1997. *313 COUNSEL Albert D. Sanchez and Roger Jon Diamond for Plaintiff and Appellant. James K. Hah

412 A.2d 1160 (1979) In the Matter of Charles W. COLSON, a Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. No. S-24-74/D-27-78. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued April 14, 1978. Decided March 23, 1979. Opinions Filed July 3, 1979. *1161 John W. Douglas, Washington, D. C., appo

OPINION GOETTEL, District Judge: Familiarity with the facts underlying this case is presumed; they have been well publicized, and were described in the Second Circuit’s opinion in United States v. Friedman, 854 F.2d 535 (1988). As that description makes clear, the investigation which bared New York City’s maggoted Parking Violations Bureau1 (the “PVB”) revealed as

MAUGHMER, Commissioner. We have here a suit, based upon a written contract, to recover a money judgment for an alleged breach of the contract. There was a verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed. Many of the facts are not in dispute. On January 3, 1966, the defendant as Nancy T. O’Neal, nee Cox (now Nancy T. Luster by reason of a second marriage) was appointed a 0case worker in the Jack

WEIER, Commissioner. This is the second appeal of old age assistance claimant, Jeannette E. Wigand, to this court. The first appeal is reported in Wigand v. State Department of Public Health and Welfare of Missouri, Mo.App., 454 S.W.2d 951. There claimant was denied relief because she had resources in excess of the statutory standards and was not in need. A reading of this opinion will supply background for the understanding

994 F.2d 609 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert P. AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,v.Robert P. AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Nos. 90-10597, 91-10024. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 12, 1991.Decided May 12, 1993.A

806 F.Supp.2d 272 (2011) Bertha SIRACO, Plaintiff v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 2:09-CV-384-DBH. United States District Court, D. Maine. July 20, 2011. Francis Jackson, Jackson & MacNichol, Portland, ME, for Plaintiff. Jason W. Valencia, Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel, Boston, MA, for Defen

MEMORANDUM OPINION CHERYL A. EIFERT, United States Magistrate Judge. This action seeks a review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (hereinafter “Commissioner”) denying Claimant’s applications for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U

To His Excellency the Governor and the Honorable Council: As justices of the Supreme Court, we furnish this opinion upon your resolution of March 4. We understand your inquiry to relate only to relief for paupers which is not directly furnished by the State. Under certain legislation (Laws 1937, c. 202) appropriation of state funds is made for assisting certain classes of persons who may be paupers in addit

To the House of Representatives: The undersigned have received a copy of a resolution passed by your honorable body, requiring our opinions on the right of the state to purchase the property described in the resolution as "the Concord Railroad." That property is no exception to the rule that private property may be taken for public use on payment of its value to its owners, and the property in question cannot be purchased or taken by the state for less than its value without the owner'

McDonald, j. A health maintenance organization (“HMO”) provides a form of health care insurance in which a member of the HMO pays a periodic fee to the HMO and the HMO finances health care services for the member without further charge to the member except for certain fees specified in the HMO plan. To support this form of health care insurance, the Maryland Health Maintenance Organization Act establishes the ground rules fo

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 17-1223 PREP TOURS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN YOUTH SOCCER ORGANIZATION; DOWNEY AYSO REGION 24; ARMANDO RODRÍGUEZ, in his capacity as Director and/or Officer and/or member of the Board of Directors of Downey AYSO Region 24; RAMÓN AGUILAR, in his capacity as Director and/or Officer and/or member of the B

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Jacqueline Dussault v. Civil No. 15-cv-441-JL Opinion No. 2017 DNH 029 Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration ORDER ON APPEAL Jacqueline Dussault appeals the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA”) denial of her application for disability benefits. A