Cases

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT QUICKEN LOANS INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 15) MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge In this case, the Government alleges that Defendant Quicken Loans Inc. underwrote, approved, and endorsed certain mortgage loans for Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) insurance between September 1, 2007 and December 31, 2011, and that thos

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 15) MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge : I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer this case to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Dkt. 15). For the reasons explained fully below, the Court grants Defendants’ motion to

CORRECTED MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 Reggie B. Walton, United States District Judge The government initiated this action against Quicken Loans Inc. (“Quicken”) pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733 (2012), Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶ 1, alleging that, between September 1, 2007, and December 31

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted. *255Same case below, 626 F.3d 799.

Thomas P. Agresti, Judge In each of the above three cases Quicken Loans, Inc. ("Quicken") has filed a Notice of Withdrawal of Notices of Postpetition Mortgage Fees, Expenses and Charges ("Withdrawal") by which it seeks to withdraw a Notice of Postpetition Mortgage Fees, Expenses, and Charges ("Notice") filed previously in the case pursuant to Fed.R.Bankr.P. 3002.1(c) . Because all three

Sup. Ct. Ark. Cer-­tiorari granted.

Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court. A provision of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), codified at 12 U. S. C. § 2607(b), prohibits giving and accepting “any portion, split, or percentage of any charge made or received for the rendering of a real estate settlement service . . . other than for services actually performed.” We consider

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

C. A. 5th Cir.; C. A. 11th Cir.; and C. A. 6th Cir. The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file briefs in these cases expressing the views of the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied. *141Same case below, 626 F.3d 1187.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

376 B.R. 747 (2007) In re Danny Ross SPLAWN and Mary Alice Splawn, Debtors. Quicken Loans, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Danny R. Splawn and M. Alice Splawn, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 7-05-19019 MA, Adversary No. 06-1010 M. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico. September 17, 2007. *748 *749

322 B.R. 302 (2005) In re Baird Richard WOHLFEIL and Lisa Ann Wohlfeil, Debtors. Gene R. Kohut, Plaintiff, v. Quicken Loans, Inc. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 04-57339-R. Adversary No. 04-4701. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. February 25, 2005. *303<

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _______________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-613 (RBW) ) QUICKEN LOANS INC.,

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge FLOYD wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge WYNN joined. FLOYD, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, Defendant-Appellant challenges the district court’s granting of Plaintiffs-Appellees’ motion to remand this case to state court. After Defendant-Appellant removed the case to federal court pursuant

[Cite as Voss v. Quicken Loans, L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-12.] `IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO SAMUEL VOSS, : APPEAL NO. C-230065 TRIAL NO. A-2002899 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. :

STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE *1276ORDER At 6:06 a.m. on December 7, 2012, Eileen Nece submitted a form on Quicken Loans' website. The form (Doc. 117-1 at 9) requires a prospective mortgagor to provide her name and a phone number and asks the prospective mortgagor several questions

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1059 PHILLIP ALIG; SARA J. ALIG; ROXANNE SHEA; DANIEL V. SHEA, Individually and on behalf of a class of persons, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. QUICKEN LOANS INC.; AMROCK INC., f/k/a Title Source, Inc., d/b/a Title Source Inc. of West Virginia, Incorporated,