Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Crim. Action No. 17-58 (EGS) DOMINIC RANDY QUEEN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. Introduction Defendant Dominic Randy Queen (“Mr. Queen”), proceeding pro se, is serving a sixty-month concurrent term of imprisonment at the Rivers Co

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Crim. Action No. 17-58 (EGS) DOMINIC RANDY QUEEN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant Dominic Randy Queen (“Mr. Queen”), who has served less than two years of his five-year sentence for the unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon

374 F.Supp.2d 219 (2005) Queen E. GLYMPH, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. No. CIV.A.01-1333(JMF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 27, 2005. *220 Richard L. Swick, Swick & Shapiro, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Tonya A. Robinson, Corporation Counsel, Washington, DC, for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) KATRINA QUEEN, KITT HASTON, and ) WILLIAM QUEEN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge The parties in this lawsuit first met in a hallway at an NBC television studio in January 2008, when the plaintiff, Michael Queen, approached Ed Schultz, the defendant. See May 13, 2015 Tr. at 13, ECF No. 169 (Testimony of Michael Queen). From all outward appea

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) KATRINA QUEEN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-2017 (PLF)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) KATRINA QUEEN et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-2017 (PLF)

180 F.Supp.2d 111 (2001) Queen E. GLYMPH, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. Civ.A. No. 01-1333(RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 26, 2001. *112 Richard L. Swick, Swick & Shapiro, P.C., Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Tonya A. Robinson, Ross M. Buchholz, Assistant Corporati

211 F.Supp.2d 152 (2002) Queen E. GLYMPH, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 01-1333(JMF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 22, 2002. Richard L. Swick, Swick & Shapiro, P.C., Washington, DC, for plaintiff. Tonya A. Robinson, Ross M. Buchholz, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, DC, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge. This case concerns the nature of the relationship between two parties involved in the formation of “The Ed Show” — a political news commentary television program hosted by the defendant, Ed Schultz, *149 on MSN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KATRINA QUEEN et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 10-2017 (RMU) : v. : Re Document No.: 36 : JANET SCHMIDT et al.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) KATRINA QUEEN, KITT HASTON, and ) WILLIAM QUEEN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-2017 (PLF)

2 A.3d 1063 (2010) Quentin C. PAIR, et al., Appellants, v. Thomas H. QUEEN, et al., Appellees. No. 08-CV-1646. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued April 13, 2010. Decided August 26, 2010. *1064 Roger A. Hayden, II, with whom Jeremy D. Rachlin, Bethesda, MD, was on the brief, for appellants. Johnn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NE’KOLE RAWLINGS, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 24- 2122 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION N.W. is a student diagnosed wi

FILED APR 02 2009 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk, u.s. District and FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bankruptcy Courts CHARLES M. BROWN, Plaintiff, v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHRISTOPHER LILLY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 15-738 (EGS) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction Plaintiff Christopher Lilly (“Mr. Lilly”) brings this action against Defendant District of Columbia (“the District”) for events arising from his employ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JAMES DORSEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 19-191 (RMC) ) RAYMON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE WHARF, INC. t/a THE WHARF, et al., Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, v. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Civil Action No. 15-1198 (CKK) Defendants, and WHARF HORIZONTAL REIT LEASEHOLDER LLC, et al., Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. MEMORANDUM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) TONIA L. JONES, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-215 (RMC) ) DISTRICT OF

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge This is one of a series of cases pending before this Court seeking damages from the Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) and individual officers for allegedly searching private homes without probable cause.1 The common thread in each case is an attack on the MPD’s practice of seeking search warrants ba