⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Purl, M.D. v. United States Department of Health and Human Services”

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-09-11 · Published · cited 0×
FILED IN NO. 13-212 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/11/15 11:24:40 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk TAMI L. WOLE'F, C.S.R. PHONE: (830) 331-8286 NO. 13-212 ROBERTSON ELECTRIC, INC. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) VS . ) 216TH JUD
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015-01-05 · Published · cited 0× · 82 F. Supp. 3d 637; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 478; 2015 WL 70914
MEMORANDUM SURRICK, District Judge. Presently before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 27) filed by Defendants, City of Philadelphia, Nefertiti Savoy, and Richard Ames, Esquire (collectively the “City Defendants”). For the following reasons, the City Defendants’ Motion will be granted. I. BACKGROUND This case presents a sordid tale of abus
District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984-01-31 · Published · cited 120× · 579 F. Supp. 823; 20 ERC 1401; 14 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20212; 20 ERC (BNA) 1401; 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19943
579 F.Supp. 823 (1984) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. NORTHEASTERN PHARMACEUTICAL AND CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 80-5066-CV-S-4. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, S.D. January 31, 1984. *824 *825 *826 Vernon Poschel,
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-10-00708-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 5:04:25 PM
Matter of TRpublic domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995-10-05 · Published · cited 6× · 665 A.2d 1260; 445 Pa. Super. 553; 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3172
445 Pa. Superior Ct. 553 (1995) 665 A.2d 1260 In the Matter of T.R., J.M., C.R. and C.R., Appellees. Appeal of A.W., Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted July 17, 1995. Filed October 5, 1995. *555 Edward Michael Flannery, Philadelphia, for appellant. Donella Shaffer, Public Defender, Phi
In re T.R.public domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995-10-05 · Published · cited 5× · 665 A.2d 1260; 445 Pa. Super. 553
KELLY, Judge: In this opinion, we are called on to determine whether the trial court, in the context of performing a juvenile dependency disposi-tional review, may order the mother of adjudicated dependents to undergo a psychological evaluation against her wishes and disclose the results of the evaluation to interested parties. We hold that such an order is consistent with the purposes of the Juvenile Act and does not viol
In Re TRpublic domain
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999-06-23 · Published · cited 25× · 731 A.2d 1276; 557 Pa. 99
557 Pa. 99 (1999) 731 A.2d 1276 In the Matter of T.R., J.M., C.R., and C.R. Appeal of A.W. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 30, 1997. Decided June 23, 1999. *100 Edward Michael Flannery, Philadelphia, for A.W. Amy Sinden, for Amicus Curiae, C.L.S. William E. Gibbson, for appellant.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1907-03-11 · Published · cited 0× · 152 F. 211; 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4274
MORRIS, District Judge. The defendant herein is a railroad company engaged in interstate commerce. The plaintiff at the time of the injury, to wit, on the 1st day of November, 1906, was an employe of the defendant, engaged in repairing its railroad track on which such commerce is carried on. The complaint rests upon two claims of negligence: The negligence of the defendant, and the negligence of its employes who were at the time
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2015-12-04 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 05-15-01480-CV 05-15-01480-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/4/2015 2:42:24 PM