Cases

Agnes, Peter W., J. I.INTRODUCTION 1. The defendant, Alissa Pugh, is charged by an indictment in two counts with Manslaughter (G.L.c. 265, §13) and unlawfully conveying away a dead body (G.L.c. 272, §71).1 These criminal charges stem from the gruesome discovery of the mangled body of an infant boy in the “hopper” of a rubbish disposal truck on January 6, 2007. One of the truck perso

Memorandum Opinion and Order Elaine E. Bucldo, United States District Judge In this action, a group of registered voters in the City of Chicago, several of whom are parents or grandparents of Chicago Public Schools students and/or have served on Local School Councils (“LSCs”), challenge Section 34-3 of the Illinois School Code, 105 ILCS 5/34-3, also known as the Chicago School Reform Amendatory Act of 1995.

717 F.Supp.2d 271 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Archie J. PUGH, Jr. and Theodore Pugh, each individually and d/b/a Archie's Tax & Accounting Service, Defendants. No. 07-cv-02456 (KAM)(VVP). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 1, 2010. *274 Daniel Applegate, Russell S. Clarke, Washington, DC, for

627 F.Supp.2d 832 (2009) William and Aldine GASPERS, Plaintiffs, v. OHIO DEPT. OF YOUTH SERVICES, et al., Defendants. Case No. C-1-06-832. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. June 8, 2009. *835 David Gerard Torchia, Cincinnati, OH, for Plaintiffs. Jack Wilson Decker, James Allan Hogan, Ohio Attorney

271 Kan. 1 (2001) 20 P.3d 39 DAVID PRAGER, III, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE; KARLA PIERCE, Secretary of the Kansas Department of Revenue, In Her Official Capacity; and JOHN D. LAFAVER, former Secretary of Kansas Department of Revenue, In His Personal Capacity, Defendants/Appellees. No. 83,714. Supreme Court of Kansas. O

264 Kan. 212 (1998) 955 P.2d 1266 JUNCTION CITY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 475, GEARY COUNTY, KANSAS, Appellee. No. 78,126. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed March 6, 1998. *213 David M. Schauner, of Topeka, argued the cause, and Greg

674 So.2d 1277 (1996) Ex parte FRANKLIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES. (Re Alan Rorer v. State of Alabama ex rel. Sandra Hillman). 1940662. Supreme Court of Alabama. January 12, 1996. *1278 William Prendergast, Sharon E. Ficquette and Mary E. Pons, Asst. Attys. Gen., Department of Human Resources, for Petitioner. John P

898 A.2d 1145 (2006) A. G. CULLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC., Petitioner v. STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, Respondent. State System of Higher Education, Petitioner v. A. G. Cullen Construction, Inc., Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs November 18, 2005. Decided March 15, 2006. *1151 Alice B

968 F.Supp. 1486 (1997) Humphrey L. SHUFORD, Plaintiff, Connie Johnson, Karen A. Newton, Myra P. Davis, and Sheryl B. Threatt, individually and on behalf of a class and subclass of persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Intervenors, Kenneth A. Brackins, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. ALABAMA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 89-T-196-N. United States District Court, M.D.

951 F.Supp. 1484 (1996) OFFICE OF HAWAI`IAN AFFAIRS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 96-00030 ACK. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. October 23, 1996. *1485 *1486 *1487 Sherry P. Broder, Honolulu, for pla

I concur in the judgment directing the circuit court to dismiss Rorer's counterclaim against the Franklin County Department of Human Resources. I must respectfully dissent from the majority's refusal to adopt the collateral order doctrine. As the majority states, the Franklin County Department of Human Resources, along with the attorney general, has asked this Court to treat its petition as an interlocutory appeal and has urged the Court to adopt the collateral order doctrine e

920 F.Supp. 393 (1996) Robert D. PINCKNEY, Plaintiff, v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE WESTBURY UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, and Joseph N. Pascarella, Arthur Outram, Henry Razzano, and Alfonso Sposito, individually and as Trustees of the Board of Education of the Westbury Union Free School District, Defendants. No. 96 CV 0952 (ADS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. A

752 F.Supp. 1020 (1990) Bessie ROLIN, Plaintiff, v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 88-0314-AH. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, S.D. August 15, 1990. *1021 Susan Williams Reeves, Birmingham, Ala., for defendants. Henry H. Caddell of Thiry, Maples, Brunson & Caddell, Mobil

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff John F. Gleason filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Board of Education of the City of Chicago, the Illinois State Board of Education and Hearing Officer Robert W. McAllister. He challenges his dismissal from his position as a tenured teacher in the Chicago school system and claims that the defendants’ actions deprived him of a property interest within the meaning of the due process

884 F.Supp. 696 (1995) RAY M., a minor under the age 21 years by his mother JUANA D.; Jackey S., a minor under the age 21 years, by his mother Yin Jiang S.; Miguel F., a minor under the age 21 years, by his mother Anatalia F.; Jose P., a minor under the age 21 years, by his mother Evelyn Q.; Katie B., a minor under the age 21 years, by her mother Carrie B.; Angel C., a minor under the age 21 years, by his mother Margarita V.; and Benjamin L., a minor und

792 F.2d 76 32 Ed. Law Rep. 928 John F. GLEASON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF CHICAGO, Angeline P.Caruso, Ruth Love, Sol Brandzel, George Munoz,Illinois State Board of Education, andRobert W. McAllister,Defendants-Appellees. No. 85-2386. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. June 2,

476 F.Supp. 681 (1979) HADDON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, Audubon Board of Education, Riverton Board of Education, Plaintiffs, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, United States Department of Agriculture, Fred G. Burke, Commissioner of Education of the State of New Jersey and his successors in office, and Robert Bergland, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture and his successors in office, Defendants. Ci

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge: Pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 49 Stat. 624 (1935), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1964), Jack C. Dean instituted this civil action for review of the Secretary’s final decision disallowing Dean’s claim for a period of disability and for disability insurance benefits under sections 216(i

438 F.Supp. 1179 (1977) John Pleasant SIMS et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF the STATE OF TEXAS et al., Defendants. Dorothy Mae WOODS et al., Plaintiffs, v. Raul JIMENEZ et al., Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 76-H-665 and 76-H-1120. United States District Court, S. D. Texas, Houston Division. October 12, 1977.

798 F.Supp. 262 (1992) LAKE ERIE INSTITUTE OF REHABILITATION, a DIVISION OF EXTENDED CARE CENTERS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MARION COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant, v. Eric EFAW, a minor, By and Through his father and natural guardian, Kenneth EFAW, Third Party Defendants. Civ. A. No. 91-83 ERIE. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. July 28, 19