⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

15 opinions for “Proton AG v. Apple, Inc.”

District Court, S.D. New York · 2007-05-31 · Published · cited 1× · 490 F. Supp. 2d 381; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39670
Opinion & Order BARBARA S. JONES, District Judge. *387TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. CO CO o I. The Parties. CO CO o II. The Patents-In-Suit. 03 05 CO A. Patent Ownership. CO CO III. The Pleadings. CO CO A. Complaint Against Mylan/Esteve.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-08-17 · Published · cited 66× · 449 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57759; 2006 WL 2380622
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
District Court, S.D. New York · 2002-10-16 · Published · cited 53× · 222 F. Supp. 2d 423; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19960; 2002 WL 31319475
222 F.Supp.2d 423 (2002) ASTRA AKTIEBOLAG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ANDRX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant. Astra Aktiebolag, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Cheminor Drugs, Ltd., et al., Defendants. Astra Aktiebolag, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Genpharm Inc., Defendant. Astra Aktiebolag, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Kremers Urban Development Co., et al., Defendants. In re Omeprazole Patent Litigation. No.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016-11-21 · Published · cited 38× · 842 F.3d 34; 2016 WL 6833338; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20845
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This appeal , arises from the first pharmaceutical-settlement antitrust action tried before a jury since the Supreme Court’s decision in FTC v. Actavis, Inc., — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2223, 186 L.Ed.2d 343 (2013). The jury found that although the plaintiffs had proved an antitrust violation in the form of a large, and unjustified reverse payment from AstraZeneca to Ranbaxy, the plaintiffs had not shown that they
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016-11-21 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 15-2005, 15-2006, 15-2007 IN RE: NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE) ANTITRUST LITIGATION AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated; VALUE DRUG COMPANY; BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC.; ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and others similarly situated; MEIJER, INC.; MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC.; ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND; LABORERS
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015-11-16 · Published · cited 2× · 151 F. Supp. 3d 525
MARKMAN OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .. .529 II. BACKGROUND .. .532 ’ A.Factual and Procedural Background ...532 1. Aripiprazole, Generally ... 533 2. The ’615, ’796, and ’760 Patents: Otsu-ka’s Aripiprazole Polymorph Patents ...533 3; The ’350 Patent:: Ots
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2020-11-23 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 13-486V (Filed: October 27, 2020) * * * * * * * * * * * * * GINGER M. MARTIN, and * To Be Published CATHERINE J. O’QUIN, as * Representatives of ESTATE OF * Denying Entitlemen
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2021-04-07 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-480V (to be published) ************************* E.S, * * Filed: November 13, 2020 Petitioner, * *
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2019-01-03 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-260V Filed: December 20, 2018 To be Published ************************************* S.E.H., * * Petitioner, *
Allen v. Hhspublic domain
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2015-10-19 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 02-1237V Filed: September 26, 2015 For Publication ******************************** COLLEEN BOSTON MADARIAGA and * JAMES ALLEN, parents and guardians of * A.A., a minor, * Measles, Mumps, and
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2015-11-24 · Published · cited 0×
AJO. °^ FILED IN RPCEiVcD IN The Court ofAppeals ^&,xtriiD°.!tfrlS0tt" =^o -We Sixth District u; 1i ii»5 c oo^\ O-Q .A^«-«U NOV 2 4 2015 r^T^J^^ ' ^oc-CW Texarkana, Texas Sv*^ ^^£<W£ TsaMua\ OxAcncA- Debra K- Autfey, Clerk
District Court, D. Oregon · 1996-12-18 · Published · cited 72× · 947 F. Supp. 1387; 46 Fed. R. Serv. 26; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18960; 1996 WL 730693
947 F.Supp. 1387 (1996) Leaann D. HALL, Plaintiff, v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORP.; et al., Defendants. Tammy JOHNSTON; Robert Johnston; Laura Bentley; Ralph Bentley; Susan Eisele; Darrell Dwayne Eisele; Michelle Tytlar; Jeffrey Tytlar, Plaintiffs, v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Debra SHERVEY, Plaintiff, v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Civil Nos. 92-182-JO (LEAD),
District Court, D. Utah · 1984-05-10 · Published · cited 35× · 588 F. Supp. 247; 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16822
588 F.Supp. 247 (1984) Irene ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. C-79-0515J. United States District Court, D. Utah, C.D. May 10, 1984. *248 *249 *250 *251
District Court, S.D. New York · 2003-02-19 · Published · cited 197× · 241 F. Supp. 2d 281; 2003 WL 358003
241 F.Supp.2d 281 (2002) In re: INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 21 MC 92(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 19, 2003. *290 Melvyn I. Weiss, Robert Wallner, Ariana J. Tadler, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, New York, NY, Stanley Bernstein, Robert Berg, Bernstein Liebhard & Lifsh
District Court, S.D. New York · 2007-05-31 · Published · cited 19× · 490 F. Supp. 2d 381
490 F.Supp.2d 381 (2007) In re OMEPRAZOLE PATENT LITIGATION. Astrazeneca AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Mylan Laboratories Inc., et al., Defendants. Astrazeneca AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Laboratorios Dr. Esteve, S.A., et al., Defendants. Astrazeneca AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lek Pharmaceutical and Chemical Co., D.D., et al., Defendants. Astrazeneca AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Apotex Corp., et al., Defendants.<