Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
15 opinions for “Proton AG v. Apple, Inc.”
AstraZeneca AB v. Mylan Laboratories Inc.public domain
Opinion & Order BARBARA S. JONES, District Judge. *387TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. CO CO o I. The Parties. CO CO o II. The Patents-In-Suit. 03 05 CO A. Patent Ownership. CO CO III. The Pleadings. CO CO A. Complaint Against Mylan/Esteve.
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
Astra Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.public domain
222 F.Supp.2d 423 (2002) ASTRA AKTIEBOLAG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ANDRX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant. Astra Aktiebolag, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Cheminor Drugs, Ltd., et al., Defendants. Astra Aktiebolag, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Genpharm Inc., Defendant. Astra Aktiebolag, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Kremers Urban Development Co., et al., Defendants. In re Omeprazole Patent Litigation. No.
American Sales Co. v. AstraZeneca LPpublic domain
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This appeal , arises from the first pharmaceutical-settlement antitrust action tried before a jury since the Supreme Court’s decision in FTC v. Actavis, Inc., — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2223, 186 L.Ed.2d 343 (2013). The jury found that although the plaintiffs had proved an antitrust violation in the form of a large, and unjustified reverse payment from AstraZeneca to Ranbaxy, the plaintiffs had not shown that they
In re: Nexium Antitrust v.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 15-2005, 15-2006, 15-2007 IN RE: NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE) ANTITRUST LITIGATION AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated; VALUE DRUG COMPANY; BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC.; ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and others similarly situated; MEIJER, INC.; MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC.; ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND; LABORERS
MARKMAN OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .. .529 II. BACKGROUND .. .532 ’ A.Factual and Procedural Background ...532 1. Aripiprazole, Generally ... 533 2. The ’615, ’796, and ’760 Patents: Otsu-ka’s Aripiprazole Polymorph Patents ...533 3; The ’350 Patent:: Ots
Martin v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 13-486V (Filed: October 27, 2020) * * * * * * * * * * * * * GINGER M. MARTIN, and * To Be Published CATHERINE J. O’QUIN, as * Representatives of ESTATE OF * Denying Entitlemen
S. v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-480V (to be published) ************************* E.S, * * Filed: November 13, 2020 Petitioner, * *
Horvath v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-260V Filed: December 20, 2018 To be Published ************************************* S.E.H., * * Petitioner, *
Allen v. Hhspublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 02-1237V Filed: September 26, 2015 For Publication ******************************** COLLEEN BOSTON MADARIAGA and * JAMES ALLEN, parents and guardians of * A.A., a minor, * Measles, Mumps, and
Allen "F" Calton v. Steve Schillerpublic domain
AJO. °^ FILED IN RPCEiVcD IN The Court ofAppeals ^&,xtriiD°.!tfrlS0tt" =^o -We Sixth District u; 1i ii»5 c oo^\ O-Q .A^«-«U NOV 2 4 2015 r^T^J^^ ' ^oc-CW Texarkana, Texas Sv*^ ^^£<W£ TsaMua\ OxAcncA- Debra K- Autfey, Clerk
Hall v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.public domain
947 F.Supp. 1387 (1996) Leaann D. HALL, Plaintiff, v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORP.; et al., Defendants. Tammy JOHNSTON; Robert Johnston; Laura Bentley; Ralph Bentley; Susan Eisele; Darrell Dwayne Eisele; Michelle Tytlar; Jeffrey Tytlar, Plaintiffs, v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Debra SHERVEY, Plaintiff, v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Civil Nos. 92-182-JO (LEAD),
Allen v. United Statespublic domain
588 F.Supp. 247 (1984) Irene ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. C-79-0515J. United States District Court, D. Utah, C.D. May 10, 1984. *248 *249 *250 *251
In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigationpublic domain
241 F.Supp.2d 281 (2002) In re: INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 21 MC 92(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 19, 2003. *290 Melvyn I. Weiss, Robert Wallner, Ariana J. Tadler, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, New York, NY, Stanley Bernstein, Robert Berg, Bernstein Liebhard & Lifsh
In Re Omeprazole Patent Litigationpublic domain
490 F.Supp.2d 381 (2007) In re OMEPRAZOLE PATENT LITIGATION. Astrazeneca AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Mylan Laboratories Inc., et al., Defendants. Astrazeneca AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Laboratorios Dr. Esteve, S.A., et al., Defendants. Astrazeneca AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lek Pharmaceutical and Chemical Co., D.D., et al., Defendants. Astrazeneca AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Apotex Corp., et al., Defendants.<