⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Progressive Land Title v. Burns, Trustee”

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017-02-07 · Published · cited 5× · 797 S.E.2d 21; 251 N.C. App. 724; 2017 WL 490469; 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 38
INMAN, Judge. *725 Kingdom Impact Global Ministries, Inc. ("Defendant" or "Kingdom Impact") appeals from the 19 June 2015 order granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of George Burns, Mack McCann, and Charles Bartlett, in their capacity as trustees of Parks Chapel Free Will Baptist
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015-12-11 · Published · cited 9× · 385 P.3d 670; 2016 OK CIV APP 60; 2015 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 137
Wm. C. Hetherington, Jr,, Chief Judge: ¶ 1 This action for breach of contract, implied duty of good faith and fair dealing (bad faith), negligence, and negligent retention was filed by Plaintiff William W. Choate (Insured) against Defendant Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, now Fidelity Title Insurance .(Title Insurer), seeking recovery under the title insurance policy issued to Insured for fire damage '.to a building on
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013-07-10 · Published · cited 5× · 465 Mass. 702; 991 N.E.2d 1066; 2013 WL 3389006; 2013 Mass. LEXIS 571
Gants, J. The issue presented on appeal is whether confidential communications between law firm attorneys and a law firm’s in-house counsel concerning a malpractice claim asserted by a current client of the firm are protected from disclosure to the client by the attorney-client privilege. We conclude that they are, provided that (1) the law firm has designated an attorney or attorneys within the firm to represent the firm as in-h
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 2011-10-11 · Published · cited 1× · 460 B.R. 520; 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 4303; 2011 WL 5505396
460 B.R. 520 (2011) In re KEELEY AND GRABANSKI LAND PARTNERSHIP, Debtor. No. 10-31482. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota. October 11, 2011. *522 DeWayne Johnston, Grand Forks, ND, for Debtor. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAD J. COLLINS, Bankruptcy Judge. The Chapter 11 Trustee, Kip M. Kaler, filed a
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011-12-27 · Published · cited 1×
REVISED December 27, 2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 09-10560 December 7, 2011 Lyle W. Cayce
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011-12-07 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 7, 2011 No. 09-10560 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021-01-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Richard G. Kinzler, Trustee of a : Trust for the Benefit of Kyra Kinzler, : Petitioner : : v. : : Workers’ Compensation Appeal : Board (Association for Vascular : Access and Twin City Fire Insurance : Company),
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978-01-19 · Published · cited 211× · 570 F.2d 1065; 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12977
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge. This appeal, involving difficult issues of constitutional law and federalism, arises from a dispute over the use of absentee and shut-in ballots in a special Democratic primary election held in the Tenth Ward of Providence, Rhode Island, on March 29, 1977. The primary was held to select the Democ
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985-06-12 · Published · cited 1× · 50 B.R. 525; 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 5959
50 B.R. 525 (1985) In re PROGRESSIVE FARMERS ASSOCIATION, Debtor. SOUTH CENTRAL ENTERPRISES, INC., Edwin M. Lipscomb Farms, Inc., and Caleb Lipscomb and Ellen Lipscomb, Plaintiffs, v. Richard FARRINGTON, Trustee, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 77-30153-B-S. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri, S.D. June 12, 1985. *526 Ri
Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993-01-22 · Published · cited 256× · 845 P.2d 1040; 1993 Wyo. LEXIS 15; 1993 WL 11172
*1041GOLDEN, Justice. This case presents a substantial evidence question and a narrow question of first impression: Whether the legislature in enacting Wyo.Stat. § 23-1-901 (July 1986)1 which permits a landowner to present a claim to the State Game and Fish Department (Department) for property damages caused by game animals, waived the st
District Court, D. Connecticut · 1974-02-07 · Published · cited 44× · 372 F. Supp. 223; 6 ERC 1275; 4 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20230; 6 ERC (BNA) 1275; 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12343
372 F.Supp. 223 (1974) I-291 WHY? ASSOCIATION, on behalf of itself and its members v. Joseph B. BURNS, as Connecticut Commissioner of Transportation, et al. Civ. No. H-229. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 7, 1974. *224 *225 *226 Hayne
District Court, D. Maryland · 1969-11-06 · Published · cited 1× · 306 F. Supp. 138; 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10962
THOMSEN, Chief Judge. Assateague Island, a long, thin strip of land off the eastern shore of Maryland and Virginia, has the Atlantic Ocean on the east and the Sinepuxent and Chincoteague Bays on the west. The northern part of the Island is in Worcester County, Maryland, the southern part in Accomack County, Virginia. In 1965 Congress decided to acquire Assateague Island for a National Seashore. P.L. 89-19
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2004-06-09 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-02-00183-CV ___________________
Oregon Supreme Court · 1959-07-01 · Published · cited 14× · 342 P.2d 803; 217 Or. 52; 1959 Ore. LEXIS 382
217 Or. 52 (1959) 342 P.2d 803 STATE LAND BOARD v. SAUSE ET AL Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued March 10, 1959. Affirmed July 1, 1959. *54 Lloyd G. Hammel, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, Salem.
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2004-04-16 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-02-00183-CV ___________________
West Virginia Supreme Court · 1959-03-31 · Published · cited 24× · 107 S.E.2d 777; 144 W. Va. 296; 1959 W. Va. LEXIS 23
107 S.E.2d 777 (1959) J. K. BROWN et al. v. CROZER COAL & LAND COMPANY, a Corporation. No. 10935. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted January 27, 1959. Decided March 31, 1959. *780 J. W. Maxwell, Beckley, D. Grove Moler, Mullens, Richardson, Hudgins & Hancock, Bluefield, for plaintiff in
District Court, N.D. Texas · 1969-04-25 · Published · cited 0× · 309 F. Supp. 887; 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13900
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW BREWSTER, District Judge. Opinion This suit is one of several brought in this Court to condemn lands in Tarrant and Parker Counties, Texas in connection with the Benbrook Dam and Reservoir Project on the Clear Fork of the Trinity River 1 near the southwest outskirts of Fort Worth, Tex
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979-11-07 · Published · cited 15× · 608 F.2d 708; 28 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 617; 57 A.L.R. Fed. 476; 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 10633
PELL, Circuit Judge. On October 10, 1970, the plaintiff-appel-lee, the United States of America, filed a complaint in condemnation to acquire land for the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Although the complaint encompassed several tracts of land, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 71A(b), this appeal concerns only the tract numbe
Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936-08-17 · Published · cited 0× · 23 Ohio Law. Abs. 44; 49 N.E.2d 194; 7 Ohio Op. 405; 1936 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1015
OPINION By CARTER, J. This cause comes into this court on appeal from the Common Pleas Court of Lake County, Ohio, wherein a finding was made by the trial court in favor of plaintiff. The plaintiff claims to be the owner in fee simple of the lands described in the petition and that the village of Fairport through its officers unlawfully and wrongfully entered upon the premises, cut down sha
Clement v. Burnspublic domain
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1862-06-15 · Published · cited 0× · 43 N.H. 609
Bellows, J.* Assuming tbe wharf to. have been raised above the ordinary high water mark, as from the case we infer it was, a highway might rightfully be laid over it, without raising the question of authority in the selectmen to lay a road over navigable waters. That part of the shore having been reclaimed by the erection of the wharf, the new land thus formed must be regarded, so far as the proprieto