Cases

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE B.E. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT FUND LP, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 12843-VCL ) FUND.COM INC., ) ) Respondent.

Affirmed as Modified in Part, Remittitur Suggested in Part, and Memorandum Opinion filed July 27, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00197-CV ZHEN QIN, AKA NICK ZHEN QIN OR NICK QIN; ELINA QIN; RIVERSTONE TOURS, INC.; US-CHINA PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC; US-CHINA PROFESSIONAL TRAVEL & TOURS, INC. F/K/A CHINESE PROFESSIONAL TRAVEL & TOURS, INC.; US-CHINA PROFESSIONAL T

BOLIN, Justice. Municipal Workers Compénsation Fund, Inc. (“the Fund”), appeals from the Jefferson Circuit Court’s order denying the Fund’s motion to vacate a judgment entered on an arbitration award. We reverse and remand. 7. Facts and Procedural History The Fund is a nonprofit corporation that administers a self-insured group workers’ compensation fund for the benefit of its

(Doc. 9) Christina Reiss, District Judge On May 11, 2017, Plaintiffs Capax Discovery, Inc. ("Capax"), Walker Global Solutions Naples, Inc., John Baiocco, Wynn Holdings, LLC, and Thomson Federal Solutions, LLC brought this New York Supreme *584Court suit in Erie County, alleging fraudulent inducement, negligent misrepresentation

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs bring this securities fraud action under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.1 They allege that a number of material misstatements and omissions made by defendant Vivendi, S.A. (“Vivendi”) artificially inflated

Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. Investors can recover damages in a private securities fraud action only if they prove that they relied on the defendant's misrepresentation in deciding to buy or sell a company's stock. In Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224,

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER COGAN, District Judge. The issue posed in this case is whether the customer accounts of an insolvent ser*558vice company, where each customer had the right to terminate service at any time, can nevertheless have value, such that if the principal of the business moves those customers to a third party in excha

EDMONDS, P. J. Defendants appeal a declaratory judgment entered by the trial court in favor of plaintiffs pursuant to ORS 28.010. Defendants are investors in a business enterprise who, in an underlying action, brought claims against two attorneys (Case and Newton) who are insured against professional liability by the Oregon State Bar’s professional liability fund (PLF). The issue in this case concerns the extent of coverage fo

*954ORDER SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are Individual1 Defendants’ January 31, 2014 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (the “Individual Motion”), and Fund2 Defendants’ January 31, 2014 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint ’(the “Funds M

The defendant Investors Guaranty Fund, Ltd. ("IGF"), appeals from a default judgment entered against it on behalf of the plaintiff Compass Bank and the codefendant Marengo County Port Authority.1 The default judgment came after three hearings and two mandamus petitions in which IGF unsuccessfully contested the trial court's personal jurisdiction. IGF never answered the complaint or the cross-claim filed by the Marengo County Port Auth

408 B.R. 167 (2009) In re LANCELOT INVESTORS FUND, L.P., et al., Debtor. Ronald R. Peterson, as Chapter 7 Trustee for Lancelot Investors Fund, L.P., et al., Plaintiff, v. Ellerbrock Family Trust, LLC, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08 B 28225. Adversary No. 09 A 00413. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 17, 2009.

Judge Max N. Tobias, Jr. The ultimate issue in this lawsuit relates to the bidding process under Louisiana’s Public Lease Law, La. R.S. 41:1211, et seq. The plaintiff, Two Canal Street Investors, Inc. (“TCSI”), appeals the trial court’s judgment, dismissing as of non-suit its lawsuit for its failure to post security for costs pursuant to La. R.S. 13:1215. Finding that the trial court abused its discretion in order

232 B.R. 870 (1999) In re PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS INSURANCE GROUP, INC., Debtor. Professional Investors Insurance Group, Inc., Plaintiff, v. United Overseas Bank (Luxembourg), S.A., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 397-34575-SAF-11, Adversary No. 397-3289. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. February 4, 1999. *871</

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) CEDARVIEW OPPORTUNITIES ) MASTER FUND, L.P., CETUS ) CAPITAL III, L.P., CORRIB ) CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., ) LITTLEJOHN OPPORTUNITIES ) MASTER FUND L.P., ) RAVENSOURCE FUND, ) STONEHILL INSTITUTIONAL ) PARTNERS, L.P., STONEHILL ) MASTER FUND LTD., ) STO

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2309 Doc: 38 Filed: 07/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 21 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2309 SAN ANTONIO FIRE & POLICE PENSION FUND; EL PASO FIREMEN & POLICEMEN’S PENSION FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 ) ADDITIONAL SECURITY BENEFIT ) FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 ) SUPPLEMENTAL FUND FOR ) HOUSING AUTHORITY ) EMPLOYEES, and ALAN ) WATERHOUSE, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.

USCA11 Case: 22-10633 Document: 58-1 Date Filed: 07/10/2023 Page: 1 of 55 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10633 ____________________ NORMAN MACPHEE, Individuall

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2013 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

Opinion JENKINS, J. This is an appeal from an order denying the special motion to strike of defendants Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Corporation and The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (collectively, Rating Agencies or defendants), 1 against plaintiff California’s Public Employees’ Retirement S

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CITY OF SARASOTA § FIREFIGHTERS’ PENSION FUND, § STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 449 § No. 305, 2023 PENSION FUND, and § STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 449 § RETIREMENT SECURITY FUND, § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, § §