Cases

527 F.Supp.2d 164 (2007) Barry GOLDBERG, Plaintiff v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and UNUM Group, Defendants. Civil No. 07-87-P-S. United States District Court, D. Maine. December 18, 2007. *165 *166 Jon Holder, Holder & Grover, Bar Harbor, ME, Mark D. Debofsky Daley, Debofsky &

530 F.Supp.2d 351 (2008) Phyllis G. WALKER, Plaintiff, v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and Unum Group, Defendants. No. 07-cv-90-GZS. United States District Court, D. Maine. January 3, 2008. *352 Jon Holder, Holder & Grover, Bar Harbor, ME, for Plaintiff. Geraldine G. Sanchez, Pierce, Atwood LLP, Portland, ME,

LUCERO, Circuit Judge. This case lies at the intersection of evolving circuit jurisprudence on judicial review of employee disability claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). Pamela A. Ray, a partner at a national law firm, filed suit against UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (“UNUM”) under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1132, seeking long-term disability ben

*203Johnson, J. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (UNUM) appeals the August 1993 decision of the Commissioner of Banking, Insurance and Securities (commissioner), which disapproved UNUM’s proposed group life insurance policy. We affirm. UNUM originally applied to the Vermont Department of Banking, Insurance and Securities (Department) in February 19

399 F.Supp.2d 1254 (2005) Angela M. HOUSE, Plaintiff, v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Defendant. No. 2:04-CV-0349-RDP. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. April 21, 2005. *1255 Calvin S. Rockefeller, III, Tuscaloosa, AL, Jeffrey N. Cotney, Gardendale, AL, for Plaintiff. Grace C. Robin

*1218OPINION AND ORDER MOSMAN, District Judge. On November 17, 2014, Magistrate Judge Stewart issued her Findings and Recommendations (“F & R”) [39], recommending that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [25] be DENIED and Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleading [26] should be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. No objectio

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TOM S. LEE, District Judge. This cause is before the court on the motion of defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America for judgment on the pleadings, which the court has converted to a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Theresa A. Taylor has responded to the motion and the court, having considered the memoranda of authorities, together with attachments s

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CYNTHIA FINKS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 08-1272 (ESH)(AK) LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION1 Upon consideration of the Plaintiff’s Mini-Brief on Attorney Fees (“Mini-Brief”) [20] and the Defendant’s response the

235 F.Supp.2d 22 (2003) Eric P. NICHOLSON, Plaintiff v. The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant No. CIV.02-202-P-C. United States District Court, D. Maine. January 7, 2003. *23 James B. Smith, Esq., Woodman Edmands Danylik & Austin, P.A., Biddeford, ME, for plaintiff. Edward P. O'Leary, Esq., Amy C. Cash

148 P.3d 832 (2005) 2005 OK 65 BP AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE AUTO PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Appellee. No. 102,299. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. September 20, 2005. Rehearing Denied and As Corrected October 30, 2006. James C. Lang, G. Steven Stidham, Brian S. Gaskill, Sneed Lang, P.C.

ORDER DUVAL, District Judge. On September 19, 2006, Berthelot, et al. v. Boh Bros. Construction, et al., C.A. No. 05-4182 was filed in the Eastern District of Louisiana. This case began the stream of complaints that have been filed as a result of damages arising out of all levee breaches which occurred in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Berthelot was transf

618 F.3d 300 (2010) In re INSURANCE BROKERAGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION OptiCare Health Systems, Inc., Comcar Industries, Inc., Sunburst Hospitality Corporation, Robert Mulcahy, Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, Glenn Singer, Redwood Oil Company, Omni Group of Companies, Bayou Steel Corporation, Clear Lam Packaging, Inc., Cellect, LLC, Enclave, LLC, Gateway Club Apartments, Ltd., Michigan Multi-King, Inc., City of Stamford, Belmont

Appellate Case: 24-3041 Document: 52-1 Date Filed: 12/30/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 30, 2025

158 F.Supp.2d 937 (2001) Lisa HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. COVENTRY HEALTH CARE OF IOWA, INC., Principal Financial Group, Inc. and Principal Mutual a/k/a Principal Life Insurance Company, Defendant. No. 4-01-CV-10196. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. July 20, 2001. *938 Roxanne Conlin, Conlin & Associates,

165 F.Supp.2d 266 (2001) THE CAYUGA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK, et al., Plaintiffs, and The Seneca-Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma and the United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. George E. PATAKI, as Governor of the State of New York, et. al., Defendants. No. 80-CV-930, 80-CV-960. United States District Court, N.D. New York. October 2, 2001.

662 F.Supp.2d 553 (2009) Maxfield CROUCH, Plaintiff, v. SIEMENS SHORT-TERM DISABILITY PLAN, Siemens Long-Term Disability Plan, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, and DOES 1 through 5, inclusive, Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:08-0866. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Charleston. September 29, 2009. *554 John

SOUTER, Associate Justice. This appeal is from the district court’s dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) of a putative class action filed by retirement-plan participants and one plan administrator. They claim that defendants are dealing with plan assets in breach of fiduciary duties imposed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), Pub. L.

687 S.E.2d 287 (2009) FULLER v. HEARTWOOD 11, LLC et al. No. A09A2036. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 24, 2009. *288 Devlin & Robinson, Jacob S. Eby, Daryl Von Yokely, Atlanta, for appellant. Proctor, Hutchins & Porterfield, Robert J. Proctor, Bradley A. Hutchins, Adam C. Caskey, Atlanta, for appellees.

NABERS, Chief Justice. For the second time, this Court is asked to consider whether Daniel R. Boyd, Debra C. Butler, and Bryan M. Kelley, coal miners who claim they were injured by exposure to a certain chemical while employed as coal miners and whose claims arose in Tuscaloosa County (“the Tuscaloosa plaintiffs”), may pursue their claims against 11 defendants, including Flexible Products Company and Micon Products Internati

703 F.Supp.2d 579 (2010) Rhonella CHAFFIN, an individual, Plaintiff, v. NISOURCE, INC. d/b/a Columbia Gas Transmission Company, an Indiana Corporation, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:08-0870. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Huntington Division. March 23, 2010. *582 John Patrick L. Stephens, Mark F. Under