Cases

158 F.Supp.2d 937 (2001) Lisa HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. COVENTRY HEALTH CARE OF IOWA, INC., Principal Financial Group, Inc. and Principal Mutual a/k/a Principal Life Insurance Company, Defendant. No. 4-01-CV-10196. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. July 20, 2001. *938 Roxanne Conlin, Conlin & Associates,

732 A.2d 12 (1999) SOUTH COVENTRY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, Appellant, v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF SOUTH COVENTRY TOWNSHIP and Merribrook Associates. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 12, 1999. Decided May 17, 1999. Reargument Denied July 15, 1999. *13 Sean A. O'Neill, Malvern, for appellant.</

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20‐3425 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. THOMAS PROCTOR, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. SAFEWAY, INC., Defendant‐Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Distric

Tyler, J. This case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts by which it appears that Margaret Berry, the pauper, had resided continuously for more than twenty years next preceding April 1, 1895, in that part of defendant town known as Coventry Gore, which was on April 1, 1895, annexed to and made part of the town of Newport pursuant to No. 287 of the Acts of 1894, and that during all that time she had supported herself and fa

OPINION THOMAS, Chief Judge: In recent years, a substantial market has developed for the purchase of unma-tured term life insurance policies. In these “viatical settlement” or “life settlement” transactions, the policyholder receives a lump-sum settlement greater than the cash surrender value of the policy, but less than the policy’s death benefit. Th

[Cite as Steeplechase Village, Ltd. v. Columbus, 2020-Ohio-7012.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Steeplechase Village, Ltd., : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 19AP-736 v. : (C.P.C. No. 16CV-2436) City of Columbus

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. Early on the morning of September 18, 2003, agents of the Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) and Puerto Rico police officers working as part of a joint federal-state task force went to the residence at # 1-17 Alondra St., Brisas de Canóvanas, Puerto Rico. Whether this address is technically in Carolina or the adjacent town of Canóvanas is not clear. One offic

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge. I. Introduction Atrion Networking Corp. (“Atrion”), a Rhode Island information technology services firm, has brought claims for breach of contract, fraud and misrepresentation, and unjust enrichment against Marble Play, LLC (“Marble Play”), stemming from Atrion’s design of a website for Marble Play. Marble Play has filed the insta

[Cite as Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. v. Ryan, 2014-Ohio-3932.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Capital One Bank (USA) N.A., : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 14AP-102 v. : (M.C. No. 2013CVF-1810) James M. Ryan, Jr.,

MEMORANDUM OPINION VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Motion To Remand (Doc. 5) (the “Remand Motion”), filed on May 30, 2012. Defendant responded to the Remand Motion on June 13, 2012. (Doc. 6). Plaintiff elected not to file a reply brief. Therefore, the Remand Motion is under submission and ripe for th

[Cite as Nebozuk v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., 2014-Ohio-1600.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Brian Nebozuk, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : v. : No. 13AP-591 (C.P.C. No. 10CV-12102) Abercrombie & Fitch Co. et al.,

OPINION {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Craig D. Griffith ("Griffith"), appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, City of Miamisburg ("appellee"), and denying Griffith's own motion for summary judgment concerning his entitlement to workers' compensation benefits. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court's judgment.

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1105(b) and 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of part VIII. of the Discussion. [EDITORS' NOTE: TEXT NOT CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION APPEARS WITH GRAY BACKGROUND BELOW.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOB CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO THE VALIDITY OF THE RELEASE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge. *331I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND . CO A. Allstate’s Agency Programs Prior to 1999. CO 1. The NO A Program . CO 2. R830 and R1500 Contracts. CO

461 B.R. 440 (2011) In re TRENTON RIDGE INVESTORS, LLC and Coventry East Investors, LLC, Debtors and Debtors in Possession. Nos. 09-62570, 09-63160. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division, at Columbus. June 23, 2011. *450 Thomas R. Allen, Allen Kuehnle Stovall & Neuman LLP, Columbus, OH, for Debtors.

965 A.2d 763 (2009) AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., Consolidated Derivative Litigation. American International Group, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Maurice R. Greenberg and Howard I. Smith, Defendants. C.A. No. 769-VCS. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted: November 12, 2008. Decided: February 10, 2009. *771 St

243 F.Supp. 873 (1965) T. Garry BUCKLEY, Janette M. Berry, James E. Fitzpatrick, Plaintiffs, v. Philip H. HOFF, Governor of Vermont, Harry H. Cooley, As Successor to Howard E. Armstrong, Secretary of State of the State of Vermont, Samuel A. Parsons, as Town Clerk of the Town of Hubbardton, Virginia L'Eucyer, as County Clerk for the County of Grand Isle, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 3653. United States Distr

26 N.J. 546 (1958) 141 A.2d 28 LORETTA R. SINATRA AND SAMUEL SINATRA, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NATIONAL X-RAY PRODUCTS CORP., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND NORTH AMERICAN PHILIP'S COMPANY, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued March 3, 1958. Argued March 3, 1958. Decided April 28, 1958.

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

Counsel for appellant insists that we have misinterpreted the previous decisions of this Court, wherein we said that the second proviso to section 215 of the Constitution does not embrace the power of the county to create funds for road purposes when the county is in no position to make a debt, observing that the decisions have been to this effect. In this we cannot agree with counsel for appellant. In the case of Southern Railway v. Jackson County, 189 Ala. 436