⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Pro-Com Products Inc. v. United States”

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024-08-07 · Published · cited 4× · 111 F.4th 1320
Case: 22-2128 Document: 90 Page: 1 Filed: 08/07/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PRIMESOURCE BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC., CHENG CH INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD., CHINA STAPLE ENTERPRISE CORP., DE FASTENERS INC., HOYI PLUS CO., LTD., LIANG CHYUAN INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., TRIM INTERNATIONAL INC., UJL INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., YU CHI HARDWARE CO., LTD., ZON MON CO., LTD., Plaintiffs-
United States Court of International Trade · 2006-06-01 · Published · cited 20× · 437 F. Supp. 2d 1352; 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 714; 30 C.I.T. 714; 28 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1839; 2006 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 81
437 F.Supp.2d 1352 (2006) ABITIBI-CONSOLIDATED INC. and its Affiliates Abitibi-Consolidated Company of Canada, Produits Forestiers Petits Paris Inc., Produits Forestiers La Tuque Inc., Produits Forestiers Saguenay Inc., Societe en Commandite Opitciwan; and Canfor Corporation and its Affiliates Canfor Wood Products Marketing Ltd., Canadian Forest Products, Ltd., and Bois Daaquam Inc. (a/k/a Daaquam Lumber Inc.), Lakeland Mills Ltd., and Winton Global Lumb
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020-11-30 · Published · cited 3× · 981 F.3d 1067
Case: 19-2381 Document: 73 Page: 1 Filed: 11/30/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ STAR PIPE PRODUCTS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2019-2381 ______________________ Appeal from the United S
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021-09-21 · Published · cited 8× · 207 Conn. App. 551
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · 2024-09-10 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 TN WC App. 33
FILED Sep 10, 2024 11:40 AM(CT) TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023-06-09 · Published · cited 14× · 70 F.4th 1351
Case: 21-2316 Document: 72 Page: 1 Filed: 06/09/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BLUE GENTIAN, LLC, NATIONAL EXPRESS, INC., TELEBRANDS CORPORATION, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-2316, 2021-2317
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023-06-09 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 21-2316 Document: 72 Page: 1 Filed: 06/09/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BLUE GENTIAN, LLC, NATIONAL EXPRESS, INC., TELEBRANDS CORPORATION, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-2316, 2021-2317
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-11-27 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-2184 (TJK) FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In July 2012, the Federal Trade Commission and Defendant Facebook, Inc.—now known as Meta Platforms, Inc.—resolved an administrative
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 23-1970 Document: 106 Page: 1 Filed: 08/28/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PERCIPIENT.AI, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, CACI, INC.-FEDERAL, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2023-1970 ______________________ Appeal from the
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2025-03-24 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ______________________________________ ) MARATHON TARGETS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 25-121 ) v. ) Filed: March 13, 2025 ) THE UNITED STATES, ) Re-issued: March 24, 2025 ∗
United States Court of International Trade · 2025-07-16 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 CIT 90
Slip Op. 25- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Court No. 23-00133 GIORGIO FOODS, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and PROCHAMP B.V., Defendant-Intervenor. Before: M. Miller Baker, Judge OPINION [The court sustains Commerce’s redete
United States Court of International Trade · 2025-03-07 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 CIT 22
Slip Op. 25-22 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Court No. 22-00122 DAIKIN AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and GUJARAT FLUOROCHEMICALS LIMITED, Defendant-Intervenor. Before: M. Miller Baker, Judge OPINION [The court sustains Commerce’s re
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2022-12-16 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-778 Filed under seal: December 8, 2022 Reissued: December 16, 2022 * FOR PUBLICATION SEKRI, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Alan M. Grayson, Orlando, FL, for the plaintiff. Rafique Anderson, Commercial Litigatio
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-08 · Published · cited 1× · 599 U.S. 140
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024-06-07 · Published · cited 12× · 104 F.4th 839
Case: 23-1970 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 06/07/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PERCIPIENT.AI, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, CACI, INC.-FEDERAL, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2023-1970 ______________________ Appeal from the U
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017-10-04 · Published · cited 97× · 872 F.3d 1290; 124 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1257; 2017 WL 4399000; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 19293
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AQUA PRODUCTS, INC., Appellant v. JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________ 2015-1177 _______________
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022-05-13 · Published · cited 21× · 34 F.4th 1063
Case: 21-1936 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 05/13/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SEKRI, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-1936 ______________________ Appeal from the United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024-03-07 · Published · cited 3× · 94 F.4th 1374
Case: 23-1210 Document: 58 Page: 1 Filed: 03/07/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ RKW KLERKS INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2023-1210 ______________________ Appeal from the United
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022-05-13 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 21-1936 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 05/13/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SEKRI, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-1936 ______________________ Appeal from the United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025-08-12 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 24-1189 Document: 61 Page: 1 Filed: 08/12/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VALEO NORTH AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, ALERIS ROLLED PRODUCTS, INC., ARCONIC CO., COMMONWEALTH ROLLED PRODUCTS INC., CONSTELLIUM ROLLED PRODUCTS RAVENSWOOD, LLC, JUPITER ALUMINUM CO., JW ALUMINUM COMPANY, NOVELIS CORP