Cases

OPINION1 HEWITT, Judge. I. Procedural Background The St. Joseph River enters Lake Michigan between St. Joseph, Michigan, and Benton Harbor, Michigan. Motion to Partially Dismiss and Memorandum in Support Thereof (Motion or Def.’s Mot.), Feb. 26, 2007, 5.2 In the 1830s, the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) re-constructed the m

611 So.2d 869 (1992) Joe E. RICE, Jr. v. Kenneth E. PRITCHARD. No. 89-CA-1333. Supreme Court of Mississippi. December 10, 1992. Rehearing Denied February 18, 1993. James H. Herring, Herring Long & Joiner, Canton, for appellant. C.R. Montgomery, Montgomery Smith-Vaniz & McGraw, Canton, for appellee. Before ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., a

05/19/2026 DA 25-0630 Case Number: DA 25-0630 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2026 MT 108 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: LYNLEA A. CLINE, Petitioner and Appellee, and DAVID R. PRITCHARD, Responden

914 A.2d 1025 (2007) 281 Conn. 262 Mary Ellen PRITCHARD v. James L. PRITCHARD. No. 17615. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued November 28, 2006. Decided February 13, 2007. *1026 Robert D. Snook, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Richard Blumenthal, attorney general

885 A.2d 207 (2005) 92 Conn.App. 327 Mary Ellen PRITCHARD v. James L. PRITCHARD. No. 25068. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued May 24, 2005. Decided November 22, 2005. *209 Robert D. Snook, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief were Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, a

928 A.2d 566 (2007) 103 Conn.App. 276 Mary Ellen PRITCHARD v. James L. PRITCHARD. No. 25068. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued May 24, 2007. Decided August 14, 2007. *568 Robert D. Snook, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, a

07/29/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 24, 2020 Session CITY OF MEMPHIS v. JOHN PRITCHARD Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-003469-16 Yolanda R. Kight, Judge ___________________________________

595 N.E.2d 728 (1992) 230 Ill. App.3d 861 172 Ill.Dec. 367 FIRST ILLINI BANK, Successor in Interest to First Galesburg National Bank and Trust Company, as Trustee for Olive F. Custer, Deceased, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Lester T. PRITCHARD, William C. Pritchard Jr., John T. Pritchard, Sarah P. Nielsen, Christopher N. Pritchard, Janis Calais, Laurie D. Brunner, Adrian H. Day, Elizabeth W. Pritchard, Ch

Lahtinen, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Devine, J.), entered January 13, 2011 in Schoharie County, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. This action was commenced in August 2009 to, among other things, foreclose two mortgages that were executed in December 2005 (but not recorded until April 2009) and to set aside as fraudulent the conveyances of the two mortgaged parcel

Lahtinen, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Devine, J.), entered January 13, 2011 in Schoharie County, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. This action was commenced in August 2009 to, among other things, foreclose two mortgages that were executed in December 2005 (but not recorded until April 2009) and to set aside as fraudulent the conveyances of the two mortgaged parcel

On Motion to Set Attorney Fees: In December 1987 we rendered judgment for the plaintiffs on a series of loans and guaranties executed in favor of the Pritchards and a pair of corporations of which the Pritchards were the principal officers. The plaintiffs now seek to recover attorney fees, as permitted by the documents embodying the loan agreements. Plaintiffs request ten percent of the amount of the judgment, which was nearly $300,000,

McCarthy, J. Curtis moved to clarify the January 2011 order. Supreme Court granted the motion and clarified that the order had determined that the mortgages and liens were valid and summary judgment was granted as to liability on the foreclosure cause of action. Curtis and Chichester (hereinafter collectively referred to as defendants) appeal that order. Supreme Court separately granted plaintiffs’ motion to confirm the repo

McCarthy, J. Curtis moved to clarify the January 2011 order. Supreme Court granted the motion and clarified that the order had determined that the mortgages and liens were valid and summary judgment was granted as to liability on the foreclosure cause of action. Curtis and Chichester (hereinafter collectively referred to as defendants) appeal that order. Supreme Court separately granted plaintiffs’ motion to confirm the repo

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE STATISTICAL ANALYSES IN DNA EXPERT TESTIMONY CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendants Joseph Pritchard and Ronnie Johnson (together, “Defendants”) are charged with conspiracy to commit bank robbery, armed bank robbery, and using a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence. This motion in limi

These cases come before the Appellate Division on the appeals of Ron Pritchard ("Ron") in No. 03-88 and Jette Pritchard ("Jette") in No. 02-88 who were found by the trial court in CA No. 118-87 to be liable to the Amerika Samoa Bank ("ASB") and the Development Bank of American Samoa ("DBAS") on a guaranty which they executed to secure loans made to business enterprises which they controlled. On August 1, 1984, ASB loaned $275,000 to S

This action came for trial on December 11, 1987. We find the facts to be as.follows: (1) On August 1, 1984, the Amerika Samoa Bank lent $275,000 to Samoa Air, Inc., a corporation whose President was defendant Ron Pritchard and whose Secretary was Jette Pritchard. (2) Also on August 1, 1984, each of the defendants signed a "continuing guaranty" form agreeing to be personally liable for the $275,000 debt incurred by the

SUPPLEMENTARY OPINION, INCLUDING INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT, ANALYSIS OF PROOF, DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION OF LAW EUGENE J. RAPHAEL, Bankruptcy Judge. Introductory Statement: The Pritchards filed their petitions in bankruptcy on May 13th, 1979. Since this was before the effective date of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 19781 all procedural matters are to be conducted

344 S.E.2d 821 (1986) David L. PRITCHARD, Vance Midgett, James Stanley, Tommy Powell, John W. Holmes, Hugh Tarkenton, Vann Ranhorn, Carlton White and Richard Turner v. ELIZABETH CITY, North Carolina; Tommy M. Combs, City Manager of Elizabeth City; John F. Weeks, Mayor of Elizabeth City; Parker Midgett, Tommy Griffin, Pete Hooker, Anne Chory, Garnie Banks, W.G. Williams, Joseph Anderson, and Annie Berry, Members of the City Council of Elizabeth Ci

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ December 10, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A16A0070. PRITCHARD v. DISCOVER BANK. It appearing that appellant, pro se, did not file an enumeration of error and brief as required by the Rules of the Court of Appeals; It also further appearing that appellant was directed by order of this Court d

SUBSTITUTE OPINION ON REHEARING Kevin Jewell, Justice We withdraw our opinion dated June 8, 2017, and issue this substitute opinion. Appellants Camil Kreit, M.D., and Samir Kreit, M.D.’s motion for rehearing is overruled. Brothers Camil and Samir Kreit appeal the .trial court’s final judgment confirming an arbitration award in favor of Brewer & Pritchard, P.C. for fees due under a