⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

14 opinions for “Prise v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.”

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011-09-09 · Published · cited 3× · 817 F. Supp. 2d 651; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101817; 2011 WL 4101145
817 F.Supp.2d 651 (2011) Deborah PRISE, Heather Rady on behalf of themselves and all employees similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-1641. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. September 9, 2011. *653 Annette M. Gifford, Cristina A. Douglass, J. Nelson Thomas, Justin
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009-09-21 · Published · cited 25× · 657 F. Supp. 2d 564; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86445; 107 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 609; 2009 WL 3048491
657 F.Supp.2d 564 (2009) Deborah PRISE and Heather Rady, Plaintiffs, v. ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC., Burton L. Hirsch Funeral Home, Inc., H.P. Brandt Funeral Home, Inc., and H. Samson, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-1470. United States District Court, *565 W.D. Pennsylvania. September 21, 2009. *57
District Court, N.D. California · 2009-07-29 · Published · cited 3× · 696 F. Supp. 2d 1057; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65523; 2009 WL 2337529
696 F.Supp.2d 1057 (2009) William HELM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC., Defendant. Claude Bryant, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Service Corporation International, et al., Defendants. Nos. C 08-01184 SI, C 08-1190 SI. United States District Court, N.D. California. July 29, 2009. *1061 Annette Gifford, Justin Co
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2017-04-19 · Published · cited 25× · 567 B.R. 715
MEMORANDUM. OPINION ON PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT TO DENY DISCHARGEABILITY OF DEBT PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 523 [Adv. Doc. No. 1] Jeff Bohm, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. Introduction Prosecution of complaints to determine dischargeability under 11 U.S.C. *720§ 523(a)(2)(A)1
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2011-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 788 F. Supp. 2d 1328; 111 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1834; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45061; 2011 WL 1496006
788 F.Supp.2d 1328 (2011) Cynthia Ann COLLINS and Beryl Dauzat, on behalf of themselves and others that are similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:08-cv-01267-AKK. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. March 31, 2011. *1330 Gregory O. Wiggins, Rocco Cala
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010-09-21 · Published · cited 23× · 742 F. Supp. 2d 681; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99372; 93 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,991; 110 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 754; 2010 WL 3824226
742 F.Supp.2d 681 (2010) Kenneth HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. BLALOCK ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-90J. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. September 21, 2010. *684 Homer L. Walton, Tucker Arensberg, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff. Thomas R. Davies, Harmon & Davies, Lancaster, PA, for Def
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013-10-01 · Published · cited 31× · 731 F.3d 1106; 2013 WL 5434809; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 20028; 98 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,166; 120 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 212
HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Abercrombie & Fitch (“Abercrombie”) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) and the court’s denial of summary judgment in favor of Abercrombie, on the EEOC’s claim that Abercrombie failed to provide a reasonable religious accommodation for a prospective employee, Samantha Elauf, in contravention of Title
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011-02-24 · Published · cited 21× · 16 A.3d 1189; 2011 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 73; 2011 WL 666308
Dana Garner petitions for review of an adjudication of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission dismissing his discrimination complaint. The Commission concluded that Garner's evidence did not establish a prima facie case of race-based discrimination on the part of his employer, Comcast of Willow Grove, Inc. (Comcast). Garner contends that Comcast disciplined its employees differently, depending upon the employee's race. The Commission found, however, that Garner's evidenc
District Court, N.D. California · 2011-09-12 · Published · cited 3× · 801 F. Supp. 2d 898; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102236; 2011 WL 2709643
801 F.Supp.2d 898 (2011) Claude BRYANT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL, et al., Defendants. No. C 08-01190 SI. United States District Court, N.D. California. July 12, 2011. Order Granting Motion to Amend September 12, 2011. *900 Annette Gifford, J. Nelson Thomas, Patrick Solomon, Cristin
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013-03-29 · Published · cited 0× · 937 F. Supp. 2d 656; 2013 WL 1336247; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46499
OPINION LENIHAN, United States Chief Magistrate Judge. Currently before the Court for disposition is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 and Western District of Pennsylvania Local Rule 56.1 (ECF No. 30). In this employment discrimination case, Plaintiff, Robert J. Wareham, asserts he was terminated by his former employer, Dollar Bank, based on his age, in violation
Venter v. Potterpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010-03-09 · Published · cited 7× · 694 F. Supp. 2d 412; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21279; 2010 WL 891273
694 F.Supp.2d 412 (2010) Olaf VENTER, Plaintiff, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General of the United States, and the United States Postal Service, Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-795. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. March 9, 2010. *416 Joseph J. Chester, Caplan & Chester, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff.
Oregon Supreme Court · 2017-02-02 · Published · cited 0× · 360 Or. 809; 388 P.3d 1028; 2017 Ore. LEXIS 100; 208 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3246
No. 5 February 2, 2017 809 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, COUNCIL 75, LOCAL 2043, Petitioner on Review, v. CITY OF LEBANON, Respondent on Review. (ERB UP1411; CA A152059; SC S062750) En Banc On review from the Court of Appeals.* Argued and submitted June 16, 2015
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016-12-27 · Published · cited 27× · 226 F. Supp. 3d 371; 2016 WL 7444953; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178475
MEMORANDUM Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge Today, litigation over ten years in the making comes to a close. On June 2, 2006, Joan Y. Summy-Long, Ph.D., sued The Pennsylvania State University and various other players for allegedly discriminating against her on the basis of sex and then retaliating against her when she attempted to redress her concerns. Her federal com
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012-01-09 · Published · cited 26× · 844 F. Supp. 2d 611; 2012 WL 45418; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2190
MEMORANDUM OPINION NORA BARRY FISCHER, District Judge. I. Introduction This matter comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Docket Nos. 47 & 49. For the reasons that follow, the Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment (Docket No. 47) will be denied, and the Defendants’ mo