Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
14 opinions for “Prise v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.”
Prise v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.public domain
817 F.Supp.2d 651 (2011) Deborah PRISE, Heather Rady on behalf of themselves and all employees similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-1641. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. September 9, 2011. *653 Annette M. Gifford, Cristina A. Douglass, J. Nelson Thomas, Justin
Prise v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.public domain
657 F.Supp.2d 564 (2009) Deborah PRISE and Heather Rady, Plaintiffs, v. ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC., Burton L. Hirsch Funeral Home, Inc., H.P. Brandt Funeral Home, Inc., and H. Samson, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-1470. United States District Court, *565 W.D. Pennsylvania. September 21, 2009. *57
Helm v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.public domain
696 F.Supp.2d 1057 (2009) William HELM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC., Defendant. Claude Bryant, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Service Corporation International, et al., Defendants. Nos. C 08-01184 SI, C 08-1190 SI. United States District Court, N.D. California. July 29, 2009. *1061 Annette Gifford, Justin Co
MEMORANDUM. OPINION ON PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT TO DENY DISCHARGEABILITY OF DEBT PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 523 [Adv. Doc. No. 1] Jeff Bohm, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. Introduction Prosecution of complaints to determine dischargeability under 11 U.S.C. *720§ 523(a)(2)(A)1
Collins v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.public domain
788 F.Supp.2d 1328 (2011) Cynthia Ann COLLINS and Beryl Dauzat, on behalf of themselves and others that are similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:08-cv-01267-AKK. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. March 31, 2011. *1330 Gregory O. Wiggins, Rocco Cala
Howard v. Blalock Electric Service, Inc.public domain
742 F.Supp.2d 681 (2010) Kenneth HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. BLALOCK ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-90J. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. September 21, 2010. *684 Homer L. Walton, Tucker Arensberg, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff. Thomas R. Davies, Harmon & Davies, Lancaster, PA, for Def
HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Abercrombie & Fitch (“Abercrombie”) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) and the court’s denial of summary judgment in favor of Abercrombie, on the EEOC’s claim that Abercrombie failed to provide a reasonable religious accommodation for a prospective employee, Samantha Elauf, in contravention of Title
Garner v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commissionpublic domain
Dana Garner petitions for review of an adjudication of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission dismissing his discrimination complaint. The Commission concluded that Garner's evidence did not establish a prima facie case of race-based discrimination on the part of his employer, Comcast of Willow Grove, Inc. (Comcast). Garner contends that Comcast disciplined its employees differently, depending upon the employee's race. The Commission found, however, that Garner's evidenc
Bryant v. Service Corp. Internationalpublic domain
801 F.Supp.2d 898 (2011) Claude BRYANT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL, et al., Defendants. No. C 08-01190 SI. United States District Court, N.D. California. July 12, 2011. Order Granting Motion to Amend September 12, 2011. *900 Annette Gifford, J. Nelson Thomas, Patrick Solomon, Cristin
Wareham v. Dollar Bankpublic domain
OPINION LENIHAN, United States Chief Magistrate Judge. Currently before the Court for disposition is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 and Western District of Pennsylvania Local Rule 56.1 (ECF No. 30). In this employment discrimination case, Plaintiff, Robert J. Wareham, asserts he was terminated by his former employer, Dollar Bank, based on his age, in violation
Venter v. Potterpublic domain
694 F.Supp.2d 412 (2010) Olaf VENTER, Plaintiff, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General of the United States, and the United States Postal Service, Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-795. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. March 9, 2010. *416 Joseph J. Chester, Caplan & Chester, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff.
American Federation of State County & Municipal Employees, Council 75, Local 2043 v. City of Lebanonpublic domain
No. 5 February 2, 2017 809 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, COUNCIL 75, LOCAL 2043, Petitioner on Review, v. CITY OF LEBANON, Respondent on Review. (ERB UP1411; CA A152059; SC S062750) En Banc On review from the Court of Appeals.* Argued and submitted June 16, 2015
Summy-Long v. Pennsylvania State Universitypublic domain
MEMORANDUM Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge Today, litigation over ten years in the making comes to a close. On June 2, 2006, Joan Y. Summy-Long, Ph.D., sued The Pennsylvania State University and various other players for allegedly discriminating against her on the basis of sex and then retaliating against her when she attempted to redress her concerns. Her federal com
Toth v. California University of Pennsylvaniapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION NORA BARRY FISCHER, District Judge. I. Introduction This matter comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Docket Nos. 47 & 49. For the reasons that follow, the Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment (Docket No. 47) will be denied, and the Defendants’ mo