Cases

Case: 22-20473 Document: 00516872441 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/25/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

Case: 22-20473 Document: 00516923654 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/06/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

OPINION PETERSON, Judge In this appeal following a remand by this court to the district court, appellant public utilities commission argues that the district court erred by (1) concluding that it is not a political subdivision of the state entitled to a lower preverdict interest rate under Minn. Stat. § 549.09, subd. 1(c)(1)(i); and (2) declining to grant a collateral-source offset for workers’ compensati

Chapter 11 MEMORANDUM DECISION MICHAEL B. KAPLAN, U.S.B.J. I. INTRODUCTION As more fully detailed below, this contested matter comes before the Court upon Princeton Office Park, L.P.’s (“Reorganized Debtor”) request for reconsideration of Plymouth Park Tax Services, LLC’s (“Plymouth”) allowed claim, which claim relates to Plymouth’s purchase of a tax sale certificate o

38 So.3d 207 (2010) PRINCETON HOMES, INC., Appellant, v. Christine M. MORGAN, Appellee. No. 4D09-958. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. June 9, 2010. *208 L. Louis Mrachek, Alan B. Rose and Brad McPherson of Page, Mrachek, Fitzgerald & Rose, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant. Rachel Studley of Wi

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS MARY E. WILLS, FILED Claimant Below, Petitioner April 25, 2019 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK vs.) No. 18-0727 (BOR Appeal No. 2052551)

Opinion issued April 20, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00284-CV ——————————— GREAT VALUE STORAGE, LLC, WORLD CLASS CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, AND NATIN PAUL, Appellants

OPINION MERRITT, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs are a husband and wife of different races. Defendant Princeton Square *633Apartments is a 200-unit residential complex in Taylor, Michigan. Claiming violations of federal and state fair housing laws, plaintiffs allege that defendant denied their rental application because of their interracial marriage. The

754 A.2d 1137 (2000) 165 N.J. 1 DYNASTY, INC., t/a Hollywood Lights, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. The PRINCETON INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued March 13, 2000 Decided July 24, 2000 *1138 Allan Maitlin, West Orange, argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Sachs, Mai

GOLDMAN, J., Plaintiff,. Princeton Sportswear Corporation, instituted this action in assumpsit against H&M Associates, Sidney Becker, and Leonard Becker on September 26, 1977. Princeton sought damages for destroyed inventory, interruption of business operations, and expenses incurred for elevator repairs, alleging that defendants willfully and intentionally faded adequately to maintain the common areas of commercial

466 S.E.2d 536 (1995) 195 W.Va. 685 CITY OF PRINCETON, Appellant, v. Samantha STAMPER, Appellee, and CITY OF PRINCETON, Appellant, v. John B. CONLEY and Garnett Conley, Appellees. CITY OF PRINCETON, Appellee, v. Samantha STAMPER, Appellant, and CITY OF PRINCETON, Appellee, v. John B. CONLEY and Garnett Conley, Appellants. Nos. 22853, 22880. Su

HOFFMAN, Judge: This case is before us on remand from our Supreme Court for consideration of appellant-lessors’ remaining contentions. In our earlier decision, we held that an exculpatory clause in the parties’ lease agreement was valid and enforceable and, accordingly, reversed the trial court’s order *328entering judgment in favor of appellee-lessee and against appe

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT LARSEN, Justice. This case involves a dispute between a landlord and a tenant, initiated by the landlord’s refusal to restore electricity, heat and elevator service to the tenant’s building after a *191fire in an adjacent building resulted in a shut-down of those services. The trial court, sitting as cha

281 N.J. Super. 134 (1995) 656 A.2d 1267 DOMINICK J. GALLO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, EUGENE MCPARTLAND AND JUSTIN HARMON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND THE DAILY PRINCETONIAN, THE PRINCETON ALUMNI WEEKLY, JOHN DOE, A FICTITIOUS NAME AND XYZ COMPANY, A FICTITIOUS NAME, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued December 7, 1994

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, Walker, Truesdell, Roth & Associates and Hobart Truesdell, as Trustees for and on behalf of the Extended Stay Litigation Trust (the “Trust”), and the Trust bring these motions to withdraw the reference, pursuant to section 157(d) of Title 28 of the United States Code, of five adversary act

764 A.2d 507 (2000) LDM, INC., t/a The Ivy Inn; Lahiere's Restaurant Inc.; Annex Grill Inc., t/a The Annex Restaurant & Bar; and National Smokers Alliance, Plaintiffs, v. PRINCETON REGIONAL HEALTH COMMISSION, Defendant. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Mercer County. Decided August 29, 2000. *510 Ross A. Lewin, Princeton, for plain

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Makowski, J.), entered January 24, 2003, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion to compel arbitration. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting the motion and as modified the order is affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In August 1981, plaintiffs David Spatz and F

SABATINO, J.S.C. Defendants in this medical malpractice case have moved in limine to bar the testimony of a registered nurse retained by plaintiff as a trial witness. Plaintiffs desired presentation of the nurse’s testimony raises novel issues under Evid. R. 1006 and other provisions of the New Jersey Evidence Rules. I. Sieglinde Heinzerling was diagnosed with lung cancer

678 F.Supp.2d 256 (2010) MATTERN & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. John SEIDEL, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Robert Mattern, et al., Third-Party Defendants. No. CIV. 06-36-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. January 14, 2010. *261 George H. Seitz, III, Esquire, and Kevin A. Guerke, Esquire, of

116 N.J. 418 (1989) 561 A.2d 1122 MARCY G. DECKER, INDIVIDUALLY; MARCY G. DECKER, AS CUSTODIAL PARENT OF JACKSON T. DECKER, AND CHARLOTTE GOLDBERG, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE PRINCETON PACKET, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND JOHN DOE, WHOSE NAME IS FICTITIOUS; AND ABC CORPORATION, WHOSE IDENTITY IS UNKNOWN, JOINTLY, INDIVIDUALLY, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS. The