Cases

501 F.3d 368 (2007) CATAWBA INDIAN TRIBE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 05-2050. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: October 25, 2006. Decided: September 20, 2007. *369 ARGUED: Jerry Jay Bender, Baker, Ravenel & Bender,

Sykes, Circuit Judge. *1109 Pro-life "sidewalk counselors" sued to enjoin Chicago's "bubble zone" ordinance, which bars them from approaching within eight feet of a person in the vicinity of an abortion clinic if their purpose is to engage in counseling, education, leafletting, handbilli

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-2196 VERONICA PRICE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ A

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-2196 VERONICA PRICE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ A

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:- This putative class action challenges the use of red light cameras within Texas and, more specifically, the legislation authorizing such cameras. The case was originally filed in state court and subsequently removed to federal court. We must decide whether it should have been remanded.1 BACKGROUND Chapter 707 of the Texas Transportatio

683 F.Supp.2d 319 (2010) CITY OF MILLVILLE, Plaintiff, v. ROCK, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-1073. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. January 12, 2010. *321 Kevin P. McCann, Michael J. Fioretti, Robert Drew Fischer, Chance & McCann, Bridgeton, NJ, for Plaintiff. John L. Slimm, Marshall, Dennehey, W

639 F.3d 384 (2011) Terri MEAGLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, Defendant-Appellee. No. 10-2932. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: April 14, 2011. Filed: May 2, 2011. *386 James M. Scurlock, argued, Little Rock, AR, Luther Oneal Sutter, on the brief, Benton, AR, for appell

707 F.Supp.2d 998 (2010) ROCK HILL MECHANICAL, INC, Plaintiff, v. LIEBERT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Case No. 4:06CV657 HEA. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. January 29, 2010. *999 Richard D. Gerber, Robert W. Cockerham, Brown and James, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff. Bryce J. Bartl

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit May 15, 2020 PUBLISH Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court

ACCEPTED 15-25-00022-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/26/2025 10:33 PM No. 15-25-00022-CV CHRIST

688 F.Supp.2d 1193 (2010) DAVID HILL DEVELOPMENT, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF FOREST GROVE, an Oregon municipal corporation, Steve A. Wood, individually and in his capacity as Project Engineer for the City of Forest Grove, Robert A. Foster, individually and in his official capacity as Engineering Director and Public Works Director for the City of Forest Grove, Defendants, City of Forest Grove, an Oregon mun

387 S.C. 223 (2010) 692 S.E.2d 499 QUAIL HILL, LLC, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF RICHLAND, South Carolina, Petitioner. No. 26788. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard January 7, 2010. Decided March 22, 2010. *227 Andrew F. Lindemann, William H. Davidson, II, Michael B. Wren, of Davidson &

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0178p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ KEVIN KEITH, │ Petitioner-Appellant,

HEARN, C.J. Quail Hill, LLC (Buyer) brought this action against Rich-land County as the result of its purchase of a 72.5 acre tract in reliance upon representations by County officers and staff regarding its zoning. The circuit court granted summary judgment to County on Buyer’s claims for equitable estoppel, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and inverse condemnation. We believe genuine issues of material fact exist a

NEWBY, Justice. In this case we examine the scope of a municipality’s power to regulate both the business of towing vehicles parked in private lots and the use of mobile telephones while driving. Municipalities are *402 vested with general police power to regulate or prohibit acts detrimental to the

Justice HOENS delivered the opinion of the Court. This appeal requires the Court to consider two issues relating to applications for zoning variances pursuant to the Municipal Land Use Law (MLUL), N.J.S.A. 40:55D-1 to -163. *269The principal question raised in this appeal is whether an application for a use variance, see

03/26/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON February 12, 2019 Session SUSAN KNIGHT AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ELTON M. JOHNSON V. HORSE CREEK ROCK INC. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hardin County No. CH-273 Carma Dennis McGee, Chancellor

• Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Judge ALLEN joined. KING, Circuit Judge: Antwain Guanterio Price was charged in the District of South Carolina in May 2012 with knowingly failing to register as a sex offender as required by the Sex Offender Registration and Notif

Robert L. Brown, Justice. Appellants City of North Litde Rock and the North Little Rock Airport Commission (joindy referred to in this opinion as North Little Rock) filed an amended appeal in circuit court from a decision of the Pulaski County Court that affirmed the assessment for ad valorem tax purposes of eleven parcels of real property located within the domain of the North Little Rock Mun

Sikora, J. In this appeal we must review the valuation of the real property of a golf course country club for the purpose of municipal taxation. The owner of the real property (club or club facilities) is Black Rock Golf Club, LLC (Black Rock). The board of assessors of the town of Hingham (assessors) valued the club at $20 million for fiscal year 2006 and at $18.6 million for fiscal year 2007.1 Thos