Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Preston Yow”
John T. Preston and C Change Investments, LLC v. Emjo Investments, Ltd. and H.J. Von Der Goltzpublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-15-00390-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 9:25:40 PM
Matter of Arendspublic domain
364 S.E.2d 169 (1988) In the Matter of Tommy ARENDS, Janie Arends, Preston Arends. No. 8722DC201. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 2, 1988. *171 Lambeth, McMillan and Weldon by Wilson O. Weldon, Jr., Thomasville, for petitioner-appellant. James F. Mock, Lexington, for Dept. of Social Services, respondent-appellee.
Lewis v. D. Hays Trucking, Inc.public domain
701 F.Supp.2d 1300 (2010) Preston LEWIS individually and as Executor of the Estate of Phyllis Lewis, deceased, Plaintiff, v. D. HAYS TRUCKING, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-01904-JOF. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. March 22, 2010. *1302 Lloyd N. Bell, Bell & Mullholland, L.L
State v. Dobbinspublic domain
178 S.E.2d 449 (1971) 277 N.C. 484 STATE of North Carolina v. Preston Eugene DOBBINS. No. 57. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 20, 1971. *456 Atty. Gen. Robert B. Morgan, Asst. Atty. Gen. William W. Melvin and T. Buie Costen, for the State. Chambers, Stein, Ferguson & Lanning, by James E
United States v. Charlie Lee Powellpublic domain
McMILLAN, District Judge: Charlie Lee Powell was convicted by a jury in the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, Salisbury Division, on May 27, 1968, under an indictment charging him with (a) uttering or passing a counterfeit $20 bill; and (b) possessing some $3,-220 of other counterfeit money. He was sentenced to ten years imprisonment on each
Chu Tai Ngan v. Backuspublic domain
RUDKIN, District Judge. The appellant, Chu Tai Ngan, an alien woman, is held under a warrant of deportation issued by the Acting Secretary of Commerce and Labor on the 30th day of December, 1912, reciting: “That the alien Jee Dai Ngan, alias Chu Tai Ngan, or Chue Tai Ngan, who landed at the port of San Francisco, Cal., ex S/S Nippon Mara, on the 17th day of June, 1910, has been found in the United St
Ex parte Isojokipublic domain
DOOLING, District Judge. Petitioner, a Swedish woman, 25 years of age and unmarried, having been denied the right to enter this country upon returning thereto from a vaudeville venture in Australia, and being held in custody for deportation by the immigration authorities, has applied to this court to be discharged upon habeas corpus. The exclusion of petitioner is based upon two grounds: (1) That she has admi
Chin Ah Yoke v. Whitepublic domain
GILBERT, Circuit Judge. The appellant appeals from the order of the court below sustaining a demurrer to a petition for a writ of ha-beas corpus. She had been arrested on the charge' that she was an alien who had been practicing prostitution since her entry into-the United States, and had been ordered deported. On the application for the writ the proceedings before the immigration officials were taken as part of the petition. I
Gin Dock Sue v. United Statespublic domain
WOLVERTON, District Judge (after stating the facts as above). Three contentions are made opposing appellant’s deportation: First, that he is a Chinese official, and on that account may not be excluded; second, that he has been engaged in business in California as a Chinese merchant for the past 6% years, and for that reason may not he excluded, although ordered deported for a prior irregular re-entry; and, third, that the court
Backus v. Owe Sam Goonpublic domain
MORROW, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). [1,2] 1. It is clear that whatever authority is possessed by the Secretary of *850Labor to deport aliens found in this country is derived from the Immigration Act of February 20, 1907, c. 1134 (34 Stat. 898, 908), and not from the Chinese Exclusion Act of September 13, 1888, c. 1015 (25 St
Healy v. Backuspublic domain
WOEVERTON, District Judge (after stating the facts as above). [1] Appellants complain! that the warrant of arrest was issued on the mere application that it be issued on the ground that petitioners “were likely to become public charges because they were Hindoo laborers. *361and that there exists a strong prejudice against them in this locality”; that the application was no
Den Ex Dem. Sasser v. Herringpublic domain
(341) Before the jury was empaneled, the defendant produced and proved a disclaimer executed by the lessor Kethly, and moved the court to strike from the declaration the count upon his demise, which his Honor refused. Upon the trial the will of one Richard Kethly was offered by the plaintiff as a link in the title, upon that count of the declaration on the demise of John Kethly. This was objected to by the defendant, because the probate was not properly certified, and the objection w
Hill v. Dalton.public domain
This is a proceeding instituted pursuant to the provisions of chapter 48 of The Code, as amended by chapter 22, Laws 1893, commonly known as "The Processioning Act." The case was before us on appeal at the Fall Term, 1904, Hill v. Dalton, 136 N.C. 339. The proceeding was conducted through its several statutory stages until it reached the Superior Court, and was then tried upon a single issue directed to the inquiry in respect to the true line of pla
in the Matter of the Guardianship of Doris L. Tippspublic domain
ACCEPTED 05-14-01495-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 7/27/2015 12:00:00 AM
People v. Alboripublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 539 Two indictments were returned by the grand jury of Los Angeles County against the defendant, both of them charging him with assault with intent to commit murder, one of them alleging that he did commit an assault with a deadly weapon upon the person of one Dominick Conterno, and the other that he committed an assa
Shaffer v. . Gaynorpublic domain
The plaintiff alleged possession in himself of the lands described in the complaint and deduced title from John C. Blake, trustee, to whom one S. T. Carrow had executed a deed in trust with power of sale. The lands had been bought by Carrow in 1872 at execution sale against Noah W. Guilford, issued on judgments rendered prior to 1868. The defendant asserted title to the land upon which the trespass was alleged to have been committed. In his further defense the defendant alleged "that during o
United States ex rel. Carapa v. Curranpublic domain
ROGERS, Circuit Judge. A writ of habeas corpus was obtained in behalf of the relator for the purpose of obtaining the relator’s release from the custody of the Commissioner of Immigration of the port of New York and her entry into the United States as an Italian subject. It appears that the relator is a native of the Island of Calymnos and as such applied for admission into the United States. That prior to such application the La
in Re: Bryan Rowespublic domain
ACCEPTED 05-15-01533-CV 05-15-01533-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/17/2015 10:17:26 AM
ACCEPTED 04-14-00357-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 8/5/201
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri