Cases

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 25 - 3501 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OP

Case: 24-50149 Document: 441-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/24/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED April 24, 2026

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PERKINS COIE LLP, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-716 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-0946 (CKK) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, et al., Defendants. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-0952 (CKK) DO

APPEL, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part from the majority/plurality opinion. In my view, only the instruction related to material adverse action in connection with plaintiffs retaliation claim is flawed. I find the district court properly instructed the jury on all other issues in this case.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE National Education Association, et al. v. Civil No. 25-cv-091-LM Opinion No. 2025 DNH 055 P United States Department of Education, et al. ORDER Ours is a nation “deeply committed to safeguarding academic freedom, which is of transcendent

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 16-1424 16-1435 16-1474 16-1482 PENOBSCOT NATION; UNITED STATES, on its own behalf, and for the benefit of the Penobscot Nation, Plaintiffs, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. AARON M. FREY, Attorney General for the State of Maine; JUDY A. CAMUSO, Commissioner for the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife; DAN

Andrew S. Hanen, United States District Court Judge Eight states and two governors1 are seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and ask this Court to hold that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals ("DACA") program is illegal because its creation and continued existence violate the procedural and substantive aspects of the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA").

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–0574 Filed June 23, 2017 Amended August 25, 2017 TINA HASKENHOFF, Appellee, vs. HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Chickasaw County, John J. Bauercamper, Judge. Employer appeals judgment on jury verdict for plaintiff on claims for sexual harassment and retaliation. DISTRICT COU

Case: 25-10372 Document: 71-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/14/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED August 14, 2026

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0233p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaint

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COUNCIL FOR OPPORTUNITY IN EDUCATION Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-cv-03491 (TSC) Civil Action No. 25-cv-03514 (TSC) v. (Consolidated Cases) U.S. DEPARTMENT

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 23-2598 _______________ CORECIVIC, INC. v. GOVERNOR OF NEW JERSEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, Appellants _______________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-0946 (CKK) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, et al., Defendants, and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, Defendant-Intervenor. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, et al., Plaintiffs, v.

MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Relator Tien H. Tran (“Relator” or “Tran”) brings this action under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33 (2013), seeking to challenge the contracting practices of Defendant Computer Sciences Corporation (“CSC”) with respect to a particular government contract.

346 F.Supp.2d 259 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, v. Richard GREEN, Defendant. United States of America, v. William Olivero, Jason Pacheco, Defendants. United States of America, v. Edward K. Mills, Defendant. United States of America, v. Jane Doe,[1] Defendant. Nos. CR. A. 02-10054-WGY, CR.A. 01-10469-WGY, CR.A. 99-10066-WGY.[2] United States D

ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 5038192 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

22-2649-cv Chinese Am. Citizens All. of Greater N.Y. v. Adams United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit _____________________________________ August Term 2022 (Argued: June 14, 2023 Decided: September 24, 2024) No. 22-2649 _________________________________