Cases

341 F.Supp.2d 1023 (2004) Amos N. PRESCOTT, Jr. and R. Donald Prescott, as Trustees of the Amos N. Prescott Trust FBO Amos N. Prescott Jr. CIC AC/UAD 1/30/1976; Amos N. Prescott Jr., as Trustee of the Amos N Prescott Jr. Trust; and Louise H. Prescott, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE CO., Defendant. No. 04 C 2442. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

756 F.Supp.2d 1113 (2010) ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT W. BAIRD & CO., INC., et. al., Defendants. Ronald Covin, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc., et al., Defendants. Nos. CV-09-8162-PCT-GMS, CV-09-8174-PCT-GMS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. November 4, 2010. *112

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

ORDER G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge. Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Joint Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing the Claims of Non-Party Bondholders (Doc. 644) and the Underwriters’ Motion to Exclude the Report and Testimony of Robert M. Smith (Doc. 774). For the reasons discussed below, the Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part, and the Motion to Exclude is denied with

BARKETT, Circuit Judge: In this diversity insurance case, Appellant Allstate Life Insurance Company (“Allstate”) appeals the summary judgment order granting to appellees Steve Miller and Nicholas Demetro (“the beneficiaries”) the proceeds of a life insurance policy on the life of John Miller. Allstate *1114

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

562 So.2d 1099 (1990) Cindy SHEPHERD v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. and Marie Laurent. No. 89-CA-2246. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. May 31, 1990. *1100 Paul A. Tabary, III, Chalmette, for appellees. Sidney D. Torres, III, Gregory J. Noto, Chalmette, for appellant. Before BYRNES, CIACCIO and WILLIAMS, JJ.

638 F.Supp.2d 1317 (2009) PRESCOTT ARCHITECTS, INC. and Jeffrey Prescott, Plaintiffs, v. LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Case No.: 3:08cv532/MCR/EMT. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division. July 1, 2009. *1318 Jonathan Thomas Holloway, Esq., Holloway Law Firm PA, Crestview, FL, for Plaintiffs.

486 F.Supp.2d 802 (2007) Christopher J. DEARBORN, Plaintiff, v. EVERETT J. PRESCOTT, INC., Defendant. No. 1:07-cv-0078-DFH-WTL. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. April 30, 2007. *803 *804 Danny E. Glass, Fine & Hatfield, Evansville, IN, for Plaintiff. <

694 So.2d 362 (1996) Fairie Catherine ROIG and George T. Roig v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. No. 96-CA-164. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. December 11, 1996. Opinion Granting Rehearing February 18, 1997. Writ Denied May 1, 1997. *364 J. Robert Ates, Joel T. Chaisson, Destreh

WALKER, Circuit Judge: These two appeals arise from dueling lawsuits pitting Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada ("Sun Life"), a life insurance company, against Imperial Holdings, Inc. and its affiliates ("Imperial"), a company that offers financing for insureds to pay their monthly premium payments. Both suits relate to life insurance policies that were issued by Sun Life to non-parties and that were subsequently acquired by Imp

FAY, Circuit Judge: The appellants, seventeen insurers that filed an ancillary tort suit in a Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) action against a group of viatical settlement companies, challenge the dismissal of their amended complaint. A viatical contract is an agreement to purchase life insurance benefits from a viator, a policyholder who is terminally ill or of advan

86 N.J. Super. 462 (1965) 207 A.2d 207 VITO CAPECE, PLAINTIFF, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF ILLINOIS, DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF ILLINOIS, AND UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTEE CO., A CORPORATION OF MARYLAND, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

655 So.2d 431 (1995) Jeffery DAIGLE v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY, M.J. Foster, M.J. Foster Industries (Bayou Sale), Bayou Sale Contractors, Inc., Stanley Sullivan, Amoco Oil Company and Amoco Production Company and M.J. Foster, Jr., Inc. No. 94 CA 0304. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. May 5, 1995.

253 Ga. 317 (1984) 319 S.E.2d 445 PRESCOTT'S ALTAMA DATSUN, INC. v. MONARCH INSURANCE COMPANY OF OHIO. 41071. Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided September 6, 1984. Rehearing Denied September 26, 1984. Terry A. Dillard, Daniell S. Landers, for appellant. Kent, Barrow & Royal, A. Martin Kent, Skinner, Wilson

McMurray, Chief Judge, dissenting. “ ‘Estoppel is usually an issue of fact to be decided by the jury. [Cit.]’ Vines v. Citizens Trust Bank, 146 Ga. App. 845, 848 (247 SE2d 528) (1978).” Adamson v. McDonald, 163 Ga. App. 38, 39 (2) (293 SE2d 512). The majority holds that as a matter of law “there was nothing done by Monarch that could have prejudiced Prescott’s rights or jeopardized its defen

29 F.Supp.2d 1314 (1998) David HIPP, Harry W. McKown, Jr., Brad Stein, Mike Stell, and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. No. 95-1332-CIV-17A. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. November 20, 1998. *1315 *1316

CX Reinsurance Company Limited, et al. v. Devon Johnson, et al., No. 691, September Term 2020. Opinion by Beachley, J. INTENDED THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARIES—INSURANCE POLICIES— PUBLIC POLICY FOR INJURED TORT CLAIMANTS—RIGHTS VEST AT TIME OF INJURY Numerous plaintiffs, who were children in the 1990s and early 2000s, were allegedly exposed to lead paint while residing in homes owned by certain landlords. These landlords had obtained insurance policies through commercial general liability po

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Lavine, Beach and Bear, Js. LAVINE, BEACH and BEAR, Js. *73 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. FACTS...548 A. Factual and Procedural History...548 B. Issues on Appeal...553