Cases

Slip Op. 25-20 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE PRECISION COMPONENTS, INC., Plaintiff, Before: Joseph A. Laroski, Jr., Judge v. Court No. 23-00218 UNITED STATES, Defendant, OPINION [Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Agency Record and sustaining the U.S. Department of Comme

Case: 23-1532 Document: 64 Page: 1 Filed: 10/08/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WORLDWIDE DOOR COMPONENTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. UNITED STATES, ENDURA PRODUCTS, INC., Defendants ALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS FAIR TRADE COMMITTEE, Defendant-Appellant ________________

Bailey, Judge. Case Summary [1] Whitesell Precision Components, Inc. ("Whitesell") brings this interlocutory appeal, pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 14(A)(5), 1 challenging the trial court's refusal to dissolve a preliminary injunction compelling Whitesell to provide automotive component parts to Autofor

Restani, Judge: In this action challenging a final scope ruling issued by the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration ("Commerce") regarding Atkore Steel Components, Inc. ("Atkore")'s cast iron electrical conduit fittings, Atkore moves the court to hold Commerce's Scope Ruling, that Atkore's cast iron electrical conduit articles fall within the antidumpi

Case: 21-1649 Document: 53 Page: 1 Filed: 02/10/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LARRY G. JUNKER, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MEDICAL COMPONENTS, INC., MARTECH MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., Defendants-Appellants ______________________ 2021-1649 ______________________

Case: 21-1649 Document: 53 Page: 1 Filed: 02/10/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LARRY G. JUNKER, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MEDICAL COMPONENTS, INC., MARTECH MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., Defendants-Appellants ______________________ 2021-1649 ______________________

Taranto, Circuit Judge. Presidio Components, Inc., which manufactures and sells a variety of ceramic capacitors, owns U.S. Patent No. 6,661,639, which describes and claims single-layer ceramic capacitors with certain features. Competitor AVX Corpo

DYK, Circuit Judge. Presidio filed suit against American Technical Ceramics Corp. (“ATC”) for patent infringement in the District Court for the Southern District of California. After separate jury and bench trials, the district court held the asserted claims were infringed and not invalid, and granted a permanent injunction. The district court limited

Justice SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court. *120 This case requires us to decide whether respondent, Static Control Components, Inc., may sue petitioner, Lexmark International, Inc., for false advertising under the Lanham Act,

749 F.Supp.2d 542 (2010) STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. Civil Action Nos. 5:02-571, 5:04-84. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Central Division, Lexington. October 28, 2010. *548 Binal J. Patel, Christopher J. Renk, Ja

OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Lexmark International, Inc. (“Lexmark”) is a major producer of laser print *395 ers and toner cartridges for its laser printers. Other companies, called remanufacturers, acquire used Lexmark toner cartridges, refill them, and sell t

ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE AND MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Re: ECF Nos. 152, 153, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 173, 175 JON S. TIGAR, District Judge Before the Court are the following motions filed by Plaintiff Icon-IP Pty Ltd. (“Icon”) and Defendant Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. (“Specialized”): (1) Defendant’s Motion Pursuant to F.R.E. 702/Dauberb to Exclude the Opinions o

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 12a0289p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, - STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC., -

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 19a0231p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT RICARDO TORRES, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │

OPINION AND ORDER HEWITT, Judge. This post-award bid protest action comes before the court on cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. Plaintiff, Precision Standard, Inc. (Precision), protests the decision of defendant, acting through the United States Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM or the government), to award a contract to Hawk Enterprises, LLC (Hawk or successful of

ORDER LANDYA McCAFFERTY, United States Magistrate Judge. In an order dated January 11, 2013, the court directed the parties to show cause why three legal issues in this case should not be decided in the manner described in that order. The parties’ show-cause briefing is now before the court. Based upon that briefing, and for the reasons that follow, this order resolves the issues described in t

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND DIRECTING THE ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge. On April 18, 2008, defendant filed a motion for reconsideration (“Def.’s Mot. for Reconsideration”) (docket entry 460) of certain aspects of this Court’s Opinion and Order filed September 14, 2007 (docket entry 440) (“Opinion and Order”). In a

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 47484 GEM STATE ROOFING, ) INCORPORATED, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant- ) Cross Respondent, ) Boise, December 2020 Term

487 F.Supp.2d 830 (2007) STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. NER Data Products, Inc., et al., Counterclaim Defendants. Nos. 5:02-571, 5:04-84. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Central Division at Lexington. April 24, 2007.

FILED Jun 04 2026, 9:02 am IN THE CLERK Court of Appeals of Indiana Indiana Supreme Court Co