Cases

(2008) POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. BCD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION and Shanghai SIM-BCD Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Defendants. Civ. No. 07-633-JJF-LPS. United States District Court, D. Delaware. April 11, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Power Integrations, Inc. ("PI") is a

MEMORANDUM ORDER Sue L. Robinson, United States District Judge At Wilmington this 25th day of April, 2016, having reviewed the motion filed by defendant Inventist, Inc. to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person or, in the alternative, to transfer venue to the Western District of Washington, and the papers filed in connection therewith; IT IS ORDERED that said motion (D.I. 17)

OPINION STARK, U.S. District Judge: Defendants Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Mylan Pharma”) and Mylan Inc. (“Mylan Inc.” and, together with Mylan Pharmaceuticals, “Mylan” or “Defendants”) have moved to dismiss the complaint filed against them by Plaintiffs Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. (“Acorda”) and Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited (“Alkermes” and, together with Acorda, “Plaintiffs”). (D.I.10) Defenda

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GREEN AMERICA RECYCLING, LLC, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CLEAN EARTH, INC., ) C.A. No. N20C-07-189 Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, ) PRW CCLD ) v.

*361MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff DNA Genotek Inc. (“Genotek”) sued defendants Spectrum DNA, Spectrum Solutions L.L.C., and Spectrum Packaging L.L.C. (collectively, “Spectrum”) for patent infringement. (D.I. I) Spectrum moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. (D.I. 19) Although the

MEMORANDUM SUE L. ROBINSON, United States District Judge At Wilmington this 4th day of February, 2016, having reviewed the papers filed in connection with the pending motions, and having heard oral argument on the same, the court issues its decision based on the reasoning that follows: 1. Background. Plaintiff DNA Genotek Inc. (“DNAG”) is a Canadian corporation with its principal place

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On January 17, 2012, Capriotti’s Sandwich Shop (“plaintiff’ or Capriotti’s), a Nevada corporation with its principal place of business in Las Vegas, Nevada, filed suit against Taylor Family Holdings, Inc. (“TFH”), its franchisee, and Natalie Delucia Taylor (“Taylor”), the president and partial owner of TFH, (collectively,

629 F.Supp.2d 338 (2009) CEPHALON, INC., and Cima Labs, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Watson Laboratories, Inc., and Watson Pharma, Inc., Defendants. Civ. No. 08-330-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. April 3, 2009. *342 William J. Marsden, Jr., Esquire, Douglas E. McCann, Esquire, and Kyle Wagne

OPINION SLEET, U.S. District Judge I. INTRODUCTION AstraZeneca AB (“AstraZeneca”) filed a complaint against defendant Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Mylan”) on June 2, 2014, alleging patent infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,951,400 (“the '400 Patent”), RE44,186 (“the Í186 Patent”), and 8,628,-799 (“the '799 Patent”). (D.I. 1.) The cause of action was triggered when Mylan fil

MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK, U.S. District Judge: Pending before the Court are Defendants Alberee Products, Inc. (“Alberee”), API Korea Co., Ltd. (“API”), and Saver Automotive Products, Inc.’s (“Saver”) (collectively, “Defendants”) motions to dismiss Robert Bosch LLC’s (“Bosch” or “Plaintiff’) patent infringement claims, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) (D.I. 45, 46), as well a

MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK,' U.S. District Judge: Pending before the Court is Defendants ASUS Technology Pte Ltd. (“ASUS Singapore”) and ASUSTek Computer Inc.’s (“ASUS Taiwan,” collectively the “Foreign Defendants”) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue. (D.I. 25) For the reasons discussed below, the Court will deny the Foreign Defendants’ motion.

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD G. ANDREWS, District Judge: The Defendants ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International, Inc. (“ACI”) filed a Motion to Dismiss [for lack of personal jurisdiction], or, in the Alternative, to Transfer [to the Northern District of California]. (D.I. 17). The motion was briefed (D.I. 18, 22, 28) and argued. (D.I. 33). The Court granted jurisdictional discovery, and rec

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On January 14, 2011, ButamaxTM Advanced Biofuels LLC (“plaintiff’ or “Buta*363max”) filed suit in this district against Gevo, Inc. (“defendant” or “Gevo”) alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 7,851,188 (“the '188 patent”). (D.I. 1) The '188 patent d

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On October 31, 2008, plaintiff Belden Technologies, Inc. (“Belden” or “plaintiff’) filed the present action against LS Corp., LS Cable Ltd. (“LS Korea”), LS Cable America, Inc. (“LS America”), Superior Essex Inc. and Superior Essex Communications LP for infringement of United States Patent Nos. 7,339,116 B2 (“the '116

OPINION FREDA L. WOLFSON, District Judge. Presently before the Court is a motion to dismiss by Defendant Sound Design Technologies, Ltd. (“SDT”) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff Oticon Inc. (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against SDT and other defendants for patent infringement. SDT argues that the Court lacks jurisdiction over SDT because it does not have the m

626 F.Supp.2d 448 (2009) BELDEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. LS CORP., LS Cable Ltd., and LS Cable America, Inc., Defendants. Civ. No. 08-823-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. June 17, 2009. *451 John W. Shaw, Esquire, Adam W. Poff, Esquire, and Karen E. Keller, Esquire, of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor,

675 F.Supp.2d 454 (2009) Brian ELLIOTT, Plaintiff, v. THE MARIST BROTHERS OF THE SCHOOLS, INC., The Archdiocese of New York, Church of the Nativity of Our Blessed Lady, Mt. St. Michael's School and Brother Damian Galligan, Defendants. Civ. No. 09-611-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. December 21, 2009. Robert Jacobs, Esquire, Thomas C. Crumplar, Esquir

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY ) INSURANCE CO. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N22C-04-200 SKR ) AIR VENT, INC. )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JAMES E. BERRY, § § No. 155, 2025 Plaintiff Below, § Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. N24C-09-033 STATE FARM MUTUAL § A

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WARREN K. MABEY, JR. and Krystal ) Mabey, husband and wife, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) C.A. No.: N16C-12-015 EMD v. ) ) CRYSTALITE BOHEMIA, S.R.O.,