⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Powell v. Holmes”

Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-04-18 · Published · cited 1× · 2022 Ohio 1272
[Cite as Landings at Beckett Ridge v. Holmes, 2022-Ohio-1272.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY THE LANDINGS AT BECKETT RIDGE, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2021-09-118 : OPINION - vs -
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020-12-28 · Published · cited 5× · 2020 Ohio 6900
[Cite as Landings at Beckett Ridge v. Holmes, 2020-Ohio-6900.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY THE LANDINGS AT BECKETT RIDGE, : CASE NO. CA2020-04-050 Appellee, : OPINION 12/28/2020
District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2014-02-19 · Published · cited 0× · 999 F. Supp. 2d 345; 999 F. Supp. 345; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20472; 2014 WL 652267
OPINION AND ORDER RONALD R. LAGUEUX, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion of Defendants to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint through entry of judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. Rule 12(c). Plaintiff Herbert Holmes seeks this Court’s review of Defendants’ interpretation and application of federal regulation 20 C.F.R. § 416.930; the misinterpretation o
Jones v. Holmespublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013-02-11 · Published · cited 15× · 2013 Ohio 448
[Cite as Jones v. Holmes, 2013-Ohio-448.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY HAROLD D. JONES, SR., : CASE NO. CA2012-07-133 Plaintiff-Appellant, : OPINION
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017-01-09 · Published · cited 4× · 2017 Ohio 55
[Cite as Rosalind Holmes v. Cobblestone Grove, 2017-Ohio-55.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY ROSALIND HOLMES, : CASE NO. CA2016-04-075 Appellant, :
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2018-07-26 · Published · cited 3× · 249 So. 3d 355
BEAM, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Dexter Powell was convicted of aggravated assault and felon in possession of a firearm following a jury trial in the Washington County Circuit Court. He appeals from those convictions, claiming: (1) ineffective assistance of counsel, and (2) insufficient evidence in support of the verdicts, both of which also were against the overwhelming weight of the
United States Tax Court · 2017-05-18 · Published · cited 0× · 148 T.C. No. 18; 113 T.C.M. 4055; 2017 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 19
ESTATE OF NANCY H. POWELL, DECEASED, JEFFREY J. POWELL, EXECUTOR, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentEstate of Powell v. Comm'rDocket Nos. 24703-12, 24731-12.1
Holmes v. Holmespublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998-05-04 · Published · cited 0× · 232 Ga. App. 434; 502 S.E.2d 294; 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 2075; 1998 Ga. App. LEXIS 703
McMurray, Presiding Judge. Dorothy Shores Holmes (“petitioner”) filed a petition for a year’s support against the estate of John Thomas Holmes, deceased (“the estate”) in the Probate Court of Muscogee County, Georgia. After the estate’s executor challenged petitioner’s claim that she was the deceased’s common law spouse, the probate court conducted an evidentiary hearing and, denied petitioner’s claim. The probate court entere
Holmes v. Powellpublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978-10-27 · Published · cited 45× · 363 So. 2d 760
The plaintiffs, Myrtis Powell and Newton B. Powell, brought this boundary-line action against the defendants, Joseph Holmes, Jr. and Nelda Holmes. The Holmes' counterclaimed. After hearing the evidence ore tenus the trial court found in favor of the plaintiffs and fixed the boundary line. The defendants have appealed from that order. The plaintiffs have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that notice of appeal was not timely made. The record suppo
Holmes v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004-06-23 · Published · cited 0× · 878 So. 2d 420; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8721; 2004 WL 1392341
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Young v. State, 744 So.2d 1077 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Davis v. State, 691 So.2d 1180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011-03-24 · Published · cited 0× · 773 F. Supp. 2d 761; 52 Communications Reg. (P&F) 898; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32836; 2011 WL 1126040
773 F.Supp.2d 761 (2011) Dominginho POWELL, Plaintiff, v. WEST ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant. Case No. 10-cv-7852. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 24, 2011. *762 Alexander Holmes Burke, Burke Law Offices, LLC, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. James Kevin Schuitz, Sessions Fishman Nathan
Powell v. Powellpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996-01-10 · Published · cited 0× · 665 So. 2d 1146; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 109; 1996 WL 6850
PER CURIAM. Carol Holm Powell, the former wife, appeals from an order denying exceptions to a General Master’s report. We reverse. The parties were divorced in 1989. Pursuant to the parties’ settlement agreement, that was incorporated into the parties’ dissolution of marriage decree, the former wife was named the primary residential parent. Paragraph 4(b) of the settlement agreement provided that “[t]h
Powell v. Raypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002-08-28 · Published · cited 10× · 301 F.3d 1200; 2002 WL 1980538
BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge. Petitioner-appellant Todd Powell, proceeding pro se, is appealing the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. We previously granted Mr. Powell a certificate of appealability on his claim that the 1997 amendments to Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 57, § 365, violate the Ex Post Facto Clause. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2010-09-30 · Published · cited 2× · 742 F. Supp. 2d 1285; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110760; 2010 WL 3943859
742 F.Supp.2d 1285 (2010) Kyra POWELL, Plaintiff, v. AT & T MOBILITY, LLC, Defendant. No. 2:09-CV-01800-LSC. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. September 30, 2010. *1287 D. Frank Davis, John E. Norris, Wesley W. Barnett, Davis & Norris LLP, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff. Archis A. Parash
State v. Holmespublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-07-01 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 Ohio 2526
[Cite as State v. Holmes, 2024-Ohio-2526.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2024-03-036 : DECISION - vs - 7/1/2024
Powell v. Hamiltonpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 755 So. 2d 815; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4669; 2000 WL 423520
PER CURIAM. DENIED. Ponton v. Gross, 576 So.2d 910 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). BARFIELD, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008-06-09 · Published · cited 0× · 146 Wash. App. 242; 191 P.3d 896
Per Curiam ¶1 This is the third time the parties in this legal malpractice action have appeared before this court. In our previous decisions, we addressed and ultimately reversed the superior court’s dismissal of the action under CR 12(b)(6). In this appeal following remand, Powell contends the superior court erred in dismissing his action on summary judgment. Because Powell fails either to address or demonstrate error in the the
Holmes v. Holmespublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986-04-09 · Published · cited 19× · 487 So. 2d 950
This is a divorce case. The husband complains upon his appeal that the trial court erred by abusing its discretion in dividing the property of the parties, in granting alimony in gross to the wife, and in awarding an attorney's fee to counsel for the wife. A division of property and the award of alimony in gross in a divorce case are matters which fall within the discretion of a trial court, whose decision thereon will not be altered on appeal unless that discretion was
Honie v. Powellpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023-01-26 · Published · cited 12× · 58 F.4th 1173
Appellate Case: 19-4158 Document: 010110804325 Date Filed: 01/26/2023 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 26, 2023
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001-06-08 · Published · cited 4× · 550 S.E.2d 617; 209 W. Va. 639; 2001 W. Va. LEXIS 59
550 S.E.2d 617 (2001) 209 W.Va. 639 James M. POWELL, Esquire, and J.C. Powell, Esquire, Doing Business as Powell Law Offices, Petitioners Below, Appellants, v. WOOD COUNTY COMMISSION, David Couch, Commissioner, Robert Tebay, Jr., Commissioner, Holmes R. Shaver, Commissioner, Respondents Below, Appellees No. 28456. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.