⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Powell v. Carmody”

Haddock v. Carmodypublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009-01-21 · Published · cited 8× · 1 So. 3d 1133; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 354; 2009 WL 129762
1 So.3d 1133 (2009) Greg HADDOCK, Nassau County Property Appraiser, and James Zingale, Executive Director of the State of Florida Department of Revenue, Appellants, v. Thomas W. CARMODY, Trustee, and Thomas J. Carmody, Trustee for the Mary K. Carmody Qualified Personal Residence Trust created January 31, 1999, Appellees. No. 1D08-241. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Supreme Court of Florida · 2025-03-27 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2022-1042 ____________ KEVIN VERICKER, Petitioner, vs. NORMAN CHRISTOPHER POWELL, Respondent. March 27, 2025 GROSSHANS, J. By statute, Florida prohibits “Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation
Carmody v. Powellpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1939-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 32 Cal. App. 2d 56; 89 P.2d 158; 1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 311
BARNARD, P. J. This is a companion case to Williams v. McDowell et al., Civil No. 2246 (ante, p. 49 [89 Pac. (2d) 155]), this day decided. The two eases were tried together, although not consolidated, and both appeals have been presented upon the same transcript. In the instant case plaintiff is the mother of Mr. Hines, who was killed in the accident in question. From the judgment in her favor, in the
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2024-12-31 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued December 31, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00224-CV ——————————— FRANK C. POWELL, Appellant V. COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Appellee
Roberson v. Powellpublic domain
New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967-06-05 · Published · cited 6× · 428 P.2d 471; 78 N.M. 69
428 P.2d 471 (1967) 78 N.M. 69 Howard ROBERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cleo POWELL, Employer and Travelers Insurance Company, Insurer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 7880. Supreme Court of New Mexico. June 5, 1967. Toulouse, Ruud, Gallagher & Walters, Albuquerque, for appellant. Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, Charles B. Larra
New York Supreme Court · 2007-11-13 · Published · cited 0× · 18 Misc. 3d 228
OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur M. Schack, J. In these two related actions, attempting to foreclose on a mortgage for condominium unit 1A, at 1229 President Street, Brooklyn, New York (block 1276, lot 1001, County of Kings), GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. alleges to be the plaintiff. GE moves for: summary judgment, pursuant to CPLR 3212, to dismiss the answer and affirmative defenses of defendant Nina Cohen
People v. Powellpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993-05-21 · Published · cited 0× · 248 Ill. App. 3d 164; 187 Ill. Dec. 774; 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 721; 618 N.E.2d 365
JUSTICE EGAN delivered the opinion of the court: Attorney Diane Powell appeals from an order of the circuit court of Cook County finding her in direct criminal contempt of court and fining her $100. The fine was stayed by the trial judge pending appeal. On January 28, 1992, Ms. Powell, an assistant public defender, appeared before the trial jud
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966-11-29 · Published · cited 0× · 192 So. 2d 581; 1966 La. App. LEXIS 4569
HARDY, Judge. This is a suit by plaintiff, individually and for the benefit of his minor daughter, seeking damages for medical expenses and personal injuries sustained by the minor. From judgment in favor of defendants rejecting plaintiff’s demands he has appealed. This suit results from an automobile-train collision which occurred about dusk-dark in the late afternoon of December 20, 1964, in the City of
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971-04-08 · Published · cited 7× · 36 A.D.2d 220; 319 N.Y.S.2d 650; 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4318
Gabrielli, J. (dissenting). I dissent and vote to reverse the order granting the motion permitting service of an amended notice of claim. By notice of claim dated March 10,1970 and served on April 9, 1970 respondents charged the town" with negligence resulting from an accident which occurred on January 22, 1970, wherein it was alleged that: “the said claimant Theodore W. Powell, while a pedestrian and as a r
Carmody v. Brookspublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1874-06-04 · Published · cited 0× · 40 Md. 240; 1874 Md. LEXIS 59
Miller, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. The appellant became purchaser of certain leasehold property belonging to the estate of the appellees’ intestate, sold under an order of the Orphans’ Court. The sale was duly'reported and ratified, but the purchaser subsequently filed a petition praying the Court to rescind the sale upon the grounds, 1st. That there is a material variance as to
Powell v. Wumkespublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944-04-14 · Published · cited 4× · 142 F.2d 4; 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3242
HEALY, Circuit Judge. In 1940 the appellants (whom we shall call the debtors) filed their petition for conciliation or an extension pursuant to § 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203, relating to agricultural compositions. Being unable to secure acceptance of their extension proposal, they amended their petition and were adjudicated bankrupts under subsection (s). The matter was then referred to the conciliation commiss
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915-04-16 · Published · cited 2× · 167 A.D. 124; 152 N.Y.S. 868; 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7455
Per Curiam: The Attorney-General has appealed from a final judgment and decree after trial at Special Term, under article 12 of the Real Property Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 50 [Laws of 1909, chap. 52], as amd. by Laws of 1910, chap. 627), in which the title in fee to the premises described in the complaint has been thereby registered in the plaintiff. All defendants, except the Attorney-General, either defa
McNamara v. Powellpublic domain
New York Supreme Court · 1938-07-07 · Published · cited 2× · 168 Misc. 806; 7 N.Y.S.2d 141; 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2007
Miller, J. Any attempt to review the evidence in detail would make this memorandum too long, and it would be of no benefit to the parties. *807After a careful review of the evidence and a thoughtful study of the most excellent briefs submitted by both plaintiff and defendants, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has established by a fair preponderance of
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2015-02-24 · Published · cited 12× · 89 F. Supp. 3d 279; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21559; 2015 WL 778749
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION HAIGHT, Senior District Judge: Defendants have filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s Ruling on Motions for Summary Judgment, dated September 29, 2014. Doc. [119]. For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ motion for reconsideration is granted in part, and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND The facts
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014-09-29 · Published · cited 3× · 50 F. Supp. 3d 171; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136760; 2014 WL 4843681
RULINGS ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HAIGHT, Senior District Judge: Attempting to apprehend the suspect of a violent crime named in an arrest war*176rant, officers of the Middletown Police Department forced entry into a small residential apartment, where they believed the suspect to be present and living. The suspect was no where to b
District Court, D. Oregon · 2018-02-01 · Published · cited 1× · 291 F. Supp. 3d 1176
Michael H. Simon, District Judge *1179Two motions are pending before the Court: Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (ECF 10); and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 13). In response to Plaintiff's request f
Texas Supreme Court · 2008-02-15 · Published · cited 142× · 247 S.W.3d 690; 51 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 472; 168 Oil & Gas Rep. 299; 2008 Tex. LEXIS 124; 2008 WL 400395
247 S.W.3d 690 (2008) Kathryn Aylor BOWDEN, Beulah Poorman Vick, Omer F. Poorman, Monte Cluck, Royce Yarbrough, and Benny Ted Powell, Petitioners, v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, GPM Gas Corporation, Phillips Gas Marketing Company, Phillips Gas Company, and GPM Gas Trading Company, Respondents. No. 03-0824. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued December 1, 2004. Decide
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 13, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D25-0825 Lower Tribunal No. 24-17931-CA-01 ________________ Robert A. Harris, Petitioner,
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018-03-06 · Published · cited 1× · 540 S.W.3d 910
KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge Introduction Plaintiffs appeal from the circuit court's judgment dismissing their petition against Thompson Coburn LLP ("Thompson Coburn"). Plaintiffs raise six points on appeal. In their first point, Plaintiffs contend that the circuit court erroneously dismissed *912their petition because the f
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2019-06-06 · Published · cited 55× · 273 So. 3d 721
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-CA-01634-SCT GULF COAST HOSPICE LLC, A MISSISSIPPI LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, JYOTI DESAI, KRUPA DESAI AND IQBAL SAVANI v. LHC GROUP INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, MISSISSIPPI HEALTH CARE GROUP, LLC, A MISSISSIPPI LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AND LHCG XXVI, LLC, A MISSISSIPPI LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/06/2017 TRIAL JUDGE: