Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Powell 1023 Corp.”
In Re Allied Chemical Corp.public domain
227 S.W.3d 652 (2007) In re ALLIED CHEMICAL CORPORATION, et al., Relator. No. 04-1023. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued November 16, 2005. Decided June 15, 2007. *653 Robert G. Newman, and Rosemarie Kanusky, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., San Antonio, R. Bruce Hurley, David G. Oliveira, Roerig Oliveira & Fisher, Brow
Batt v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.public domain
438 F.Supp.2d 1315 (2006) Bob BATT, Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 05-CV-421-CVE-PJC. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. July 14, 2006. Jana Beth Leonard, Jason Dean Leonard, Sara Elizabeth Collier, Shannon C. Smith, Leonard & Assoc., Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiff. Russell L. Mulinix, Mulinix Ogden Hall Andrews &
Snyder v. Medical Service Corp.public domain
988 P.2d 1023 (1999) 98 Wash.App. 315 Michelle SNYDER, Appellant, v. MEDICAL SERVICE CORPORATION OF EASTERN WASHINGTON, Respondent. No. 18053-1-III. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Six. December 2, 1999. *1025 William J. Powell, Powell & Morris, Spokane, for Appellant. Keller W
Powell v. Hockerpublic domain
OPINION Yeary, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. In Padilla v. McDaniel, 122 S.W.3d 805, 808 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003), we held that, “when a court of appeals and this court have concurrent, original jurisdiction of a petition for a writ of mandamus against the judge of a district or county court, the petition should be presented first to the court of appeals unless there is a compelling
Powell v. National Institute of Building Sciencespublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMIR CLAYTON POWELL, Plaintiff, v. No. 23-cv-3336 (DLF) NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BUILDING SCIENCES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Amir Clayton Powell brings this employment discrimination action against the
Kroon v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELOISE KROON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 23-cv-2948 (CRC) NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. d/b/a AMTRAK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Veteran Amtrak employee Eloise Kroon claims the company intentionally lowballed her on an internal job
Powell v. System Transport Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER ACOSTA, United States Magistrate Judge: Introduction This post-judgment matter involves two parties and the interests of their respective insurers: plaintiff, Angela Powell (“Powell”); Powell’s Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) coverage provider, Allstate, Inc. (“Allstate”); defendant, System Transport, Inc. (“System Transport”); and System Transport’s mo
Joseph M. Ellis, Judge Telester Powéll appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Jackson County granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Kansas City (“the City”) in an action Appellant filed against the City for alleged Sunshine Law violations. For the following reasons, the judgment is affirmed. On October 5, 2011, the City sent a
Cyntec Company, Ltd. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp.public domain
Case: 22-1873 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 10/16/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CYNTEC COMPANY, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee v. CHILISIN ELECTRONICS CORP., CHILISIN AMERICA LTD., Defendants-Appellants ______________________ 2022-1873 _____________
Fedmet Resources Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION Stanceu, Chief Judge: Plaintiff Fedmet Resources Corporation (“Fedmet”), a U.S. importer, challenges an internal directive of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs” or “CBP”) that targeted only Fedmet. Designated by Customs as a “user defined rule,” or “UDR,” the directive instructed Customs port directors on bonding to secure potential
Universal Steel Bldgs. Corp. v. Duespublic domain
[Cite as Universal Steel Bldgs. Corp. v. Dues, 2024-Ohio-698.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MERCER COUNTY UNIVERSAL STEEL BUILDINGS CORP., DBA OLYMPIA STEEL BUILDINGS CORPORATION, CASE NO. 10-22-07 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE/ CROSS-APPELLANT, v. DANIEL DUES, ET AL., OPIN
Bombardier Aerospace Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: Bombardier Aerospace Corporation claims it is not required to remit federal excise tax on fees collected from participants in its fractional-aircraft-ownership program. The district court disagreed and ruled in favor of the Government on cross-motions for summary judgment. We AFFIRM. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
[Cite as Harborside of Dayton Ltd. Partnership v. Safety Natl. Cas. Corp., 2023-Ohio-4562.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY HARBORSIDE OF DAYTON LIMITED : PARTNERSHIP et al. : : C.A. No. 29621 Appellants
Powell's Books, Inc. v. Myerspublic domain
(2008) POWELL'S BOOKS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Hardy MYERS, Attorney General of the State of Oregon, et al., Defendants. No. CV 08-501-MO. United States District Court, D. Oregon. December 12, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER MOSMAN, J. Plaintiffsbookstores, non-profit literary, legal, and health organizations, and an individual (collectively "P
Powell v. Powellpublic domain
644 So.2d 269 (1994) Marvin POWELL v. Christine A. POWELL. No. 92-CA-00497. Supreme Court of Mississippi. October 20, 1994. *270 Halbert E. Dockins, Jr., Jackson, for appellant. Roy J. Perilloux, Perilloux & Milner, Sean A. Milner, Jackson, for appellee. En Banc. ON PETITION FOR REHEARING<
Chawla v. Lockheed Martin Corp.public domain
ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 34] filed by defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation (“LMC”). The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff Dr. Muneeb Chawla’s Title VII claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and over plaintiffs state law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
People v. Exxon Mobil Corp.public domain
People of the State of New York, BY LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, againstExxon Mobil Corporation, Defendant. 452044/2018 Plaintiff was represented by the Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York, 28 Liberty
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANDREW SIMMERS, Plaintiff, v. No. 21-cv-1023 (DLF) NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Andrew Simmers brings this case under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45
Dickie v. Cannondale Corp.public domain
905 N.E.2d 888 (2009) 329 Ill.Dec. 50 Dean A. DICKIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CANNONDALE CORPORATION and R.R.B. Bicycles, Ltd., Defendants and (Wellgo Corporation, Defendant-Appellee). No. 1-07-2810. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. March 13, 2009. *889 Rosa M. Tumialan, Sar
Bailey v. Miltope Corp.public domain
513 F.Supp.2d 1232 (2007) Patrick BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. MILTOPE CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 2:05-cv-1061-MEF. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. January 8, 2007. *1233 *1234 Bishop Derrick Blythe, Attorney at Law, Alexander City, AL, for Plaintiff. David Woot