Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Posey v. State of Nevada”
Hipsaver Co., Inc. v. JT Posey Co.public domain
497 F.Supp.2d 96 (2007) The HIPSAVER COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. J.T. POSEY COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-10917-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 19, 2007. *97 *98 Aaron V. O'Donnell, Edward Cosmo Ho, Mark T. Palm, Scott K. Dauscher, Atkinson Andelson Loya Ru
Hudson v. Poseypublic domain
255 Cal.App.2d 89 (1967) PEARL D. HUDSON, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, v. MARY J. POSEY, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. Civ. No. 23980. California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. Three. Oct. 16, 1967. Spurr, Brunner & Nelson and George L. Nelson for Defendant, Cross- complainant and Appellant. Leo M. Cook for Plaintiff,
Posey v. United Statespublic domain
416 F.2d 545 Billy Wayne POSEY, Cecil Ray Price, Horace Doyle Barnette,Jimmy Snowden, Jimmy Arledge, Alton Wayne Robertsand Sam Holloway Bowers, Jr., Appellants,v.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 25654. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. July 17, 1969, Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc DeniedAug. 28, 1969.
Posey v. United Statespublic domain
MEHRTENS, District Judge: After a trial on an indictment charging eighteen persons with violating 18 U.S.C. § 241 by conspiring to injure, threaten, oppress and intimidate Michael Schwerner, James Earl Chaney and Andrew Goodman in the free exercise of their Constitutional rights not to be deprived of life or liberty without due process of law, the jury found seven of the defendants guilty and eight not guilty. There was a mist
REECE v. STATEpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:REECE v. STATE Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only
REECE v. STATEpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:REECE v. STATE Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only
State v. Hallpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Hall, 2025-Ohio-3199.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MEIGS COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 22CA12 v. : JAQUAN HALL,
State v. Campbellpublic domain
VandeWalle, Chief Justice. [¶ 1] Anthony Campbell appealed a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty of murder. We affirm, concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in its evidentiary decisions relating to the testimony of Campbell’s expert witness and the admission of evidence of prior bad acts.
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PAULA LAUREN GIBSON and ANNETTE D. GOODE-PARKER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 07-56124 v. D.C. No. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF CALIFORNIA; BILL CV-07-00838-FMC ORDER AND LOCKYER; RICHAR
State v. Riedelpublic domain
EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, J.: {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Justin Riedel, appeals from his domestic violence and illegal cultivation of marijuana convictions following a jury trial. He raises the following assignments of error for our review: 1. The trial court erred when it failed to suppress evidence obtained as a result of an illegal search of Riedel's home w
Posey v. United Statespublic domain
HOOD, Associate Judge. Appellant was convicted of assault of an indecent nature on a ten year old boy. Two errors are assigned. The first error claimed is that the victim of the assault was not competent to testify, because when preliminarily questioned by the trial court he stated he did not know the difference between right and wrong and did not know the meaning of an oath. The record discloses the foll
State v. Nwachukwapublic domain
[Cite as State v. Nwachukwa, 2015-Ohio-3282.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 9-15-03 v. AMANZE NWACHUKWA, AKA TONY JAMES, AKA TONY SMITH, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Marion County Common Pleas Court
State v. Carrpublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by Per Curiam,: Defendant Reginald Dexter Carr, Jr., and his brother, Jonathan D. Carr, were jointly charged, convicted, and sentenced for crimes committed in a series of three incidents in December 2000 in Wichita. This is R. Carr’s direct appeal from his 50 convictions and 4 death sentences. In the first incident on December 7 and 8, Andrew S
MARTINEZ GUZMAN (WILBER) VS. DIST. CT. (STATE)public domain
137 Nev., Advance Opinion I IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA WILBER ERNESTO MARTINEZ No. 81842 GUZMAN, Petitioner, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, HLEE11 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE; AND THE HO
Guevara v. Statepublic domain
OPINION Opinion by KAREN ANGELINI, Justice. Appellant James George Guevara was found guilty of the 1993 murder of his wife, Velia Guevara, and was sentenced to life in prison. On appeal, he raises the following issues: (1) the trial court committed reversible error in admitting an out-of-court statement by Minnie Salinas as a statement by a co-conspirator pursuant to Texas Rule of Evidence
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
Hunt v. City of Portlandpublic domain
726 F.Supp.2d 1244 (2010) Lindsay HUNT, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, an Oregon municipal corporation; William Hubner, an individual; Joseph Schilling, an individual; Eric Hendricks, an individual; Bryan Parman, an individual; Judy Brumfield, an individual; Leslie Pintarich, an individual; and Quency Ho, an individual, Defendants. Case No. 08-CV-802-AC. United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portla
Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two
Smith v. Transport Services Co. of Illinoispublic domain
MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge. |!Transport Services Co. of Illinois and its insurer, Protective Insurance Company (collectively, “Transport”), have filed the instant writ application seeking supervisory review of the trial court’s denial of their peremptory exception of prescription. Finding merit in Transport’s arguments, we grant the writ application, reverse the judgment of the trial court, and dismiss this case with prejudice.
James George Guevara v. Statepublic domain
i i i i i i OPINION No. 04-07-00027-CR James George GUEVARA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas,