⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Portillo Rivera v. Bondi”

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016-01-29 · Published · cited 0× · 812 F.3d 885; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 1515; 2016 WL 370660
JORDAN, Circuit Judge. Ace Patterson, a Florida prisoner, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his habeas corpus petition, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, as second or successive under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). As we explain, under our prior decision in Insignares v. Secretary, 755 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir.2014), Mr. Patterson’s § 2254 petition is not second or successive within the meaning of § 2244(b). We therefore r
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017-03-03 · Published · cited 114× · 849 F.3d 1321; 2017 WL 836035; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3852; 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1238
JORDAN, Circuit Judge, joined by WILSON, MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges, dissenting: There are legitimate questions about whether Insignares v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, 755 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir. 2014), correctly applied Magwood v. Patterson, 561 U.S. 320, 130 S.Ct. 2788, 177 L.Ed.2d 592 (2010), as to when there is an intervening judgment under 28 U.S.C.
California Court of Appeal · 1985-01-28 · Published · cited 0× · 164 Cal. App. 3d 148; 211 Cal. Rptr. 540; 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 1586
Opinion KLEIN, P. J. Tyco Industries, Inc. (Tyco), a corporation, petitioned this court for a writ of mandate seeking relief from the trial court’s overruling of Tyco’s demurrer to the causes of action pleaded by real party in interest Alan Richards (Richards). Because Richards failed to state a cause of action for either violation of Labor Code section 970 (section 970) or wrongful dischar
California Court of Appeal · 1985-01-28 · Published · cited 26× · 164 Cal. App. 3d 148; 211 Cal. Rptr. 540
164 Cal.App.3d 148 (1985) 211 Cal. Rptr. 540 TYCO INDUSTRIES, INC., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; ALAN RICHARDS, Real Party in Interest. Docket No. B006825. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. January 28, 1985. *151 COUNSEL Finley,