Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
14 opinions for “Porter v. Framingham, MA, Town of”
Jellyman v. City of Worcesterpublic domain
TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE Richard A. Jellyman ("Plaintiff") brought this claim for excessive force (Count I), assault and battery (Count II), intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count III), violation of civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Count IV), and conspiracy (Count V) against the Cit
Smith v. City of Westfieldpublic domain
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-12243 VIRGINIA B. SMITH & others1 vs. CITY OF WESTFIELD & others.2 Hampden.
E.T. ex rel. Doe v. Bureau of Special Education Appeals of the Division of Administrative Law Appealspublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Saylor, United States District Judge This dispute arises out of an administrative decision by the Massachusetts Bureau of Special Education Appeals (“BSEA”) denying tuition reimbursement under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq., for a student with Asperger’s Syndrome. Plaintiffs E.T. and his parents, proceed
57 F.3d 21 68 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 34,68 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 352,66 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,617Karin CLARKE, Plaintiff, Appellant,v.KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendant, Appellee. No. 94-1950. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard Jan. 12, 1995.Decided June 14, 1995.
Watson v. Perezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket No. 31) TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE Kimberly Espino and Karim Watson (collectively, Plaintiffs) brought this civil *368rights action against various Worcester County court officers, as well as the Regional Security Director and a former First Assistant District Attorney, f
Lund v. Hendersonpublic domain
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS NATHANIEL M. GORTON, District Judge. After consideration of plaintiffs objection thereto (Docket No. 90), Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted. *98 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (# 62) COLLINGS, United States
507 F.Supp.2d 155 (2007) RHODE ISLAND CARPENTERS ANNUITY FUND, Rhode Island Carpenters Pension Fund, Rhode Island Carpenters Vacation Fund, Rhode Island Carpenters Health Fund, and Donald Lavin, in his official capacity as Co-Administrator of the Funds, Plaintiffs, v. TREVI ICOS CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 04-163S. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. September 4, 200
Perry v. Spencerpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 16-2444 JWAINUS PERRY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. LUIS S. SPENCER, Commissioner; THOMAS DICKHAUT, Former Superintendent; ANTHONY M. MENDONSA, Former Deputy of Classification; JAMES J. SABA, Superintendent; ABBE NELLIGAN, Deputy of Classification; PATRICK TOOLIN, Correctional Program Officer; KRISTIE LADOUCEUR
Culhane v. Aurora Loan Servicespublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. “What does a judge do?” asked my three year old granddaughter Mia. Without half thinking, I answered, “A judge teaches law to people who come to court.” Upon reflection, that answer is about as good as any.1 Trial judges teach the law to lawyers through evidentiary rulings; they teach th
48 F.Supp.2d 65 (1999) UNITED STATES of America v. MASSACHUSETTS WATER RESOURCES AUTHORITY, and Metropolitan District Commission Civil Action No. 98-10267-RGS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 3, 1999. *66 George B. Henderson, United States Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, for plaintiff. John M. Stevens, J
Miara v. First Allmerica Financial Life Insurancepublic domain
379 F.Supp.2d 20 (2005) Maria MIARA, Plaintiff, v. FIRST ALLMERICA FINANCIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Joseph F. Bonasera, Baker Associates Insurance Agency, and Gary M. Baker Defendants. No. CIV.A.,04-12188-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 16, 2005. *21 *22 William D. C
Armstrong v. Lamypublic domain
938 F.Supp. 1018 (1996) Barry ARMSTRONG and Kim Armstrong, Plaintiffs, v. Michael LAMY, Thomas Lamy in his capacity as Executor for the Estate of Cecilia Lamy, Thomas Lamy, Philip Lamy, Catherine (Lamy) Puzzo, City of Peabody, Robert Ireland, individually and in his capacity as Superintendent of Schools, Edward J. O'Connor, individually and in his capacity as Principal, J. Henry Higgins Junior High School, Nicholas Mavroules, individually and in
97 F.Supp.2d 155 (2000) UNITED STATES of America v. MASSACHUSETTS WATER RESOURCES AUTHORITY, and Metropolitan District Commission. No. 98CV10267. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 5, 2000. *156 Brian G. Donahue, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Div., Washington, DC, George B. Henderson,
Burke v. Sun America, Inc.public domain
Botsford, J. The plaintiff, Francis D. Burke (“Burke”), brings the first of these consolidated actions (No. 98-4842) to set aside the foreclosure sales of two condominium properties located at 448 and 452 Broadway in Cambridge, Massachusetts (sometimes collectively referred to as “the properties”). The defendant SunAmerica, Inc. (“SunAmerica”) through its servicing agent, the defendant J. E. Robert Company, Inc. (“JER”), conduct